mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>
To: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Carlos Santa" <carlos.santa@intel.com>,
	"Ryan Neph" <ryanneph@google.com>,
	"Christian Koenig" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"Huang Rui" <ray.huang@amd.com>,
	"Matthew Auld" <matthew.auld@intel.com>,
	"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
	"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
	"Simona Vetter" <simona@ffwll.ch>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/33] drm/ttm: Record sub-optimal page order allocations in ttm_tt
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2026 18:34:40 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <au08wNRON0_b5wuG@nvishwa1-desk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260711025619.2540575-4-matthew.brost@intel.com>

On Fri, Jul 10, 2026 at 07:55:49PM -0700, Matthew Brost wrote:
>When __ttm_pool_alloc() fails to allocate a chunk at the device's
>beneficial order and falls back to a smaller order, the object ends up
>backed by a sub-optimal set of pages. Nothing currently records this, so
>a driver has no way to know an object would benefit from being re-backed
>with beneficial-order pages later.
>
>Add TTM_TT_FLAG_BENEFICIAL_ORDER_FAILED to struct ttm_tt page_flags,
>cleared at the start of every fresh allocation (in both ttm_pool_alloc()
>and ttm_pool_restore_and_alloc()). Set it in __ttm_pool_alloc() when an
>allocation at exactly the beneficial order fails before dropping to a
>lower order.
>
>Drivers can use this hint to queue the buffer object for later
>defragmentation.
>
>Cc: Carlos Santa <carlos.santa@intel.com>
>Cc: Ryan Neph <ryanneph@google.com>
>Cc: Christian Koenig <christian.koenig@amd.com>
>Cc: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
>Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
>Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
>Cc: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
>Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
>Cc: David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
>Cc: Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>
>Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
>Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
>Assisted-by: GitHub_Copilot:claude-opus-4.8
>Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
>---
> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> include/drm/ttm/ttm_tt.h       | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c
>index 5b7d7f5ae53d..e9175c0290d7 100644
>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c
>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c
>@@ -796,6 +796,7 @@ static int __ttm_pool_alloc(struct ttm_pool *pool, struct ttm_tt *tt,
> 			    struct ttm_pool_alloc_state *alloc,
> 			    struct ttm_pool_tt_restore *restore)
> {
>+	const unsigned int beneficial_order = ttm_pool_beneficial_order(pool);
> 	enum ttm_caching page_caching;
> 	gfp_t gfp_flags = GFP_USER;
> 	pgoff_t caching_divide;
>@@ -846,6 +847,16 @@ static int __ttm_pool_alloc(struct ttm_pool *pool, struct ttm_tt *tt,
> 		/* If that fails, lower the order if possible and retry. */
> 		if (!p) {
> 			if (order) {
>+				/*
>+				 * Failing to allocate at the device's beneficial
>+				 * order means we are about to back this object
>+				 * with a sub-optimal (smaller order) set of
>+				 * pages. Record it so the driver can later try to
>+				 * defragment the object back to beneficial order.
>+				 */
>+				if (beneficial_order && order == beneficial_order)
>+					tt->page_flags |=
>+						TTM_TT_FLAG_BENEFICIAL_ORDER_FAILED;

I haven't looked at beneficial_reclaim_backoff usecase yet, but this flag
gets set irrespective of whether the allocation failure resulted with/without
the beneficial_reclaim_backoff request from the driver. Is that intended?

Other than that, the change here LGTM, though I still need to look at how driver uses
this flag in more detail.

Niranjana

> 				--order;
> 				page_caching = tt->caching;
> 				allow_pools = true;
>@@ -910,6 +921,7 @@ int ttm_pool_alloc(struct ttm_pool *pool, struct ttm_tt *tt,
> 	if (WARN_ON(ttm_tt_is_backed_up(tt)))
> 		return -EINVAL;
>
>+	tt->page_flags &= ~TTM_TT_FLAG_BENEFICIAL_ORDER_FAILED;
> 	ttm_pool_alloc_state_init(tt, &alloc);
>
> 	return __ttm_pool_alloc(pool, tt, ctx, &alloc, NULL);
>@@ -942,6 +954,7 @@ int ttm_pool_restore_and_alloc(struct ttm_pool *pool, struct ttm_tt *tt,
> 	if (!restore) {
> 		gfp_t gfp = GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN;
>
>+		tt->page_flags &= ~TTM_TT_FLAG_BENEFICIAL_ORDER_FAILED;
> 		ttm_pool_alloc_state_init(tt, &alloc);
> 		if (ctx->gfp_retry_mayfail)
> 			gfp |= __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL;
>diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_tt.h b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_tt.h
>index 406437ad674b..ce7533677d77 100644
>--- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_tt.h
>+++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_tt.h
>@@ -90,6 +90,14 @@ struct ttm_tt {
> 	 * TTM_TT_FLAG_BACKED_UP: TTM internal only. This is set if the
> 	 * struct ttm_tt has been (possibly partially) backed up.
> 	 *
>+	 * TTM_TT_FLAG_BENEFICIAL_ORDER_FAILED: Set by the TTM pool allocator
>+	 * when at least one chunk that could have been allocated at the pool's
>+	 * beneficial order had to fall back to a smaller order. This indicates
>+	 * that a sub-optimal set of pages was chosen for this object, and can
>+	 * be used by drivers to queue the buffer object for later
>+	 * defragmentation. Drivers should access this via the
>+	 * ttm_tt_is_beneficial_order_failed() helper.
>+	 *
> 	 * TTM_TT_FLAG_PRIV_POPULATED: TTM internal only. DO NOT USE. This is
> 	 * set by TTM after ttm_tt_populate() has successfully returned, and is
> 	 * then unset when TTM calls ttm_tt_unpopulate().
>@@ -101,8 +109,9 @@ struct ttm_tt {
> #define TTM_TT_FLAG_EXTERNAL_MAPPABLE	BIT(3)
> #define TTM_TT_FLAG_DECRYPTED		BIT(4)
> #define TTM_TT_FLAG_BACKED_UP	        BIT(5)
>+#define TTM_TT_FLAG_BENEFICIAL_ORDER_FAILED	BIT(6)
>
>-#define TTM_TT_FLAG_PRIV_POPULATED	BIT(6)
>+#define TTM_TT_FLAG_PRIV_POPULATED	BIT(7)
> 	uint32_t page_flags;
> 	/** @num_pages: Number of pages in the page array. */
> 	uint32_t num_pages;
>@@ -179,6 +188,19 @@ static inline void ttm_tt_clear_backed_up(struct ttm_tt *tt)
> 	tt->page_flags &= ~TTM_TT_FLAG_BACKED_UP;
> }
>
>+/**
>+ * ttm_tt_is_beneficial_order_failed() - Whether the tt is backed at a
>+ * sub-optimal page order
>+ * @tt: The struct ttm_tt.
>+ *
>+ * Return: true if the pool allocator had to fall back below the pool's
>+ * beneficial order when backing this tt, false otherwise.
>+ */
>+static inline bool ttm_tt_is_beneficial_order_failed(const struct ttm_tt *tt)
>+{
>+	return tt->page_flags & TTM_TT_FLAG_BENEFICIAL_ORDER_FAILED;
>+}
>+
> /**
>  * ttm_tt_create
>  *
>-- 
>2.34.1
>

  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-06  2:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-11  2:55 [PATCH v3 00/33] drm/ttm, drm/xe: Minimize dma-resv hold times and defragment sub-optimally backed BOs Matthew Brost
2026-07-11  2:55 ` [PATCH v3 01/33] drm/ttm/pool: Allow backing off reclaim at the beneficial order Matthew Brost
2026-11-06  2:55   ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-07-11  2:55 ` [PATCH v3 02/33] drm/ttm/pool: Add ttm_pool_page_order_nodma() helper Matthew Brost
2026-11-05 11:27   ` Matthew Auld
2026-11-06  2:30   ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-07-11  2:55 ` [PATCH v3 03/33] drm/ttm: Record sub-optimal page order allocations in ttm_tt Matthew Brost
2026-11-06  2:34   ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura [this message]
2026-07-11  2:55 ` [PATCH v3 04/33] drm/ttm: Introduce ttm_pool_alloc_iter for __ttm_pool_alloc() Matthew Brost
2026-11-06  2:39   ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-07-11  2:55 ` [PATCH v3 05/33] drm/ttm: Support defragmentation moves Matthew Brost
2026-11-06  2:51   ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-07-11  2:55 ` [PATCH v3 06/33] drm/ttm: Add fault injection for beneficial-order allocation failures Matthew Brost
2026-11-06  2:54   ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-07-11  2:55 ` [PATCH v3 07/33] drm/ttm: Harvest beneficial-order pages on defragmentation moves Matthew Brost
2026-07-11  2:55 ` [PATCH v3 08/33] drm/ttm: Bound page (re)allocation per defragmentation move Matthew Brost
2026-07-11  2:55 ` [PATCH v3 09/33] drm/ttm: Preallocate beneficial-order defrag pages outside the lock Matthew Brost
2026-07-11  2:55 ` [PATCH v3 10/33] drm/ttm: Add full out-of-lock preallocation for ttm_pool_alloc() Matthew Brost
2026-07-11  2:56 ` [PATCH v3 15/33] drm/xe: Track BOs backed at a sub-optimal page order Matthew Brost
2026-07-11  2:56 ` [PATCH v3 16/33] drm/xe: Back off beneficial-order reclaim under defrag pressure Matthew Brost
2026-07-11  2:56 ` [PATCH v3 17/33] drm/xe: Add xe_migrate_copy_defrag() for on-GPU defrag copies Matthew Brost
2026-11-03 12:58   ` Matthew Auld
2026-11-03 20:08     ` Matthew Brost
2026-11-04 12:37       ` Matthew Auld
2026-07-11  2:56 ` [PATCH v3 18/33] drm/xe: Handle defrag moves in xe_bo_move() Matthew Brost
2026-07-11  2:56 ` [PATCH v3 19/33] drm/xe: Skip self-copies for borrowed pages on defrag moves Matthew Brost
2026-07-11  2:56 ` [PATCH v3 20/33] drm/xe: Add a page defragmentation worker Matthew Brost
2026-07-11  2:56 ` [PATCH v3 21/33] drm/xe: Add defrag GT stats Matthew Brost
2026-07-11  2:56 ` [PATCH v3 22/33] drm/xe: Add Kconfig.profile options for BO defrag configuration Matthew Brost
2026-07-11  2:56 ` [PATCH v3 23/33] drm/xe: Defrag using out-of-lock page preallocation Matthew Brost
2026-07-11  2:56 ` [PATCH v3 24/33] drm/xe: Add defrag profiling tracepoints Matthew Brost
2026-07-11  2:56 ` [PATCH v3 25/33] drm/xe: Preallocate system BO backing outside the dma-resv lock Matthew Brost
2026-07-11  2:56 ` [PATCH v3 26/33] drm/xe: Add tracepoint for xe_gem_create_ioctl Matthew Brost
2026-07-11  2:56 ` [PATCH v3 27/33] drm/xe: Add IOVA-based xe_res_cursor variant Matthew Brost
2026-11-04 12:23   ` Matthew Auld
2026-07-11  2:56 ` [PATCH v3 28/33] drm/xe: Use IOVA-based DMA mapping for eligible tt BOs Matthew Brost
2026-11-03 19:00   ` Matthew Auld
2026-11-03 20:21     ` Matthew Brost
2026-11-04 11:39       ` Matthew Auld
2026-11-05  3:04         ` Matthew Brost
2026-07-11  2:56 ` [PATCH v3 29/33] drm/xe: Add per-device dependency scheduler for IOVA defrag finalize Matthew Brost
2026-07-11  2:56 ` [PATCH v3 30/33] drm/xe: Add packed copy-step IOVA mapping for defrag Matthew Brost
2026-07-11  2:56 ` [PATCH v3 31/33] drm/xe: Blit src-natural to dst-packed for defrag-IOVA copies Matthew Brost
2026-07-11  2:56 ` [PATCH v3 32/33] drm/xe: Finalize defrag-IOVA moves with post-copy job Matthew Brost
2026-07-11  2:56 ` [PATCH v3 33/33] drm/amdgpu: Preallocate system BO pages outside the reservation lock Matthew Brost
2026-07-11 10:46   ` Christian König
2026-07-13 20:24     ` Matthew Brost
2026-07-14  9:17       ` Christian König
2026-07-14 15:15         ` Matthew Brost

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=au08wNRON0_b5wuG@nvishwa1-desk \
    --to=niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=carlos.santa@intel.com \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=ray.huang@amd.com \
    --cc=ryanneph@google.com \
    --cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®