mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kayra Cizmeci <kayracizmeci@gmail.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	juri.lelli@redhat.com,  vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
	dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	 bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, vschneid@redhat.com,
	kprateek.nayak@amd.com,  joshdon@google.com, tj@kernel.org,
	jakub@okonski.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] sched/fair: Make cfs_rq::idle the sum of ancestor tg::idle
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2026 12:01:18 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <au2WhI-GE4CPVcGg@scheduler.schedules> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261106085320.GB1922751@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Fri, Nov 06, 2026 at 09:53:20AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 06, 2026 at 09:31:06AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > > > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > > > @@ -15594,8 +15594,10 @@ static void set_next_task_fair(struct rq
> > > >  		hrtick_start_fair(rq, p);
> > > >  }
> > > >  
> > > > -void init_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> > > > +void init_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct cfs_rq *parent)
> > > >  {
> > > > +	if (parent)
> > > > +		cfs_rq->idle = parent->idle;
> > > 
> > > AFAICT this creates a race:
> > 
> > > Or am I missing something?
> > 
> > Nah, you're right, this needs rq->lock.
> 
> Something like so..
> 
> ---
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -8970,7 +8970,7 @@ void __init sched_init(void)
>  		rq->nr_running = 0;
>  		rq->calc_load_active = 0;
>  		rq->calc_load_update = jiffies + LOAD_FREQ;
> -		init_cfs_rq(&rq->cfs, NULL);
> +		init_cfs_rq(&rq->cfs);
>  		init_rt_rq(&rq->rt);
>  		init_dl_rq(&rq->dl);
>  #ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -15594,10 +15594,8 @@ static void set_next_task_fair(struct rq
>  		hrtick_start_fair(rq, p);
>  }
>  
> -void init_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct cfs_rq *parent)
> +void init_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
>  {
> -	if (parent)
> -		cfs_rq->idle = parent->idle;
>  	cfs_rq->tasks_timeline = RB_ROOT_CACHED;
>  	cfs_rq->zero_vruntime = (u64)(-(1LL << 20));
>  	raw_spin_lock_init(&cfs_rq->removed.lock);
> @@ -15648,7 +15646,7 @@ int alloc_fair_sched_group(struct task_g
>  			goto err;
>  
>  		se = tg_se(tg, i);
> -		init_cfs_rq(cfs_rq, tg_cfs_rq(parent, i));
> +		init_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
>  		init_tg_cfs_entry(tg, cfs_rq, se, i, tg_se(parent, i));
>  		init_entity_runnable_average(se);
>  	}
> @@ -15661,19 +15659,20 @@ int alloc_fair_sched_group(struct task_g
>  
>  void online_fair_sched_group(struct task_group *tg)
>  {
> -	struct sched_entity *se;
> -	struct rq_flags rf;
> -	struct rq *rq;
>  	int i;
>  
>  	for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
> -		rq = cpu_rq(i);
> -		se = tg_se(tg, i);
> -		rq_lock_irq(rq, &rf);
> +		struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = tg_cfs_rq(tg, i);
> +		struct sched_entity *se = tg_se(tg, i);
> +		struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(i);
> +
> +		guard(rq_lock_irq)(rq);
> +
>  		update_rq_clock(rq);
>  		attach_entity_cfs_rq(se);
>  		sync_throttle(tg, i);
> -		rq_unlock_irq(rq, &rf);
> +
> +		cfs_rq->idle = tg_cfs_rq(tg->parent, i)->idle;
>  	}
>  }
>  


Yeah this should do the job.


Thanks!

Kayra



  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-06  9:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-05 16:55 [PATCH 0/3] sched/fair: Fix cgroup::idle preemption Peter Zijlstra
2026-11-05 16:55 ` [PATCH 1/3] sched/fair: Use guard in sched_group_set_idle() Peter Zijlstra
2026-11-05 17:42   ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-11-06 16:04   ` Vincent Guittot
2026-11-05 16:55 ` [PATCH 2/3] sched/fair: Make cfs_rq::idle the sum of ancestor tg::idle Peter Zijlstra
2026-11-05 19:20   ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-11-06  8:31     ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-11-06  8:53       ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-11-06  9:01         ` Kayra Cizmeci [this message]
2026-11-06  8:57       ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-11-06  9:01         ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-11-06  9:11           ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-11-06 16:24           ` Vincent Guittot
2026-11-05 16:55 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/3] sched/eevdf: Fix sched idle task group preemption Peter Zijlstra
2026-11-05 20:10   ` Kayra Cizmeci

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=au2WhI-GE4CPVcGg@scheduler.schedules \
    --to=kayracizmeci@gmail.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=jakub@okonski.org \
    --cc=joshdon@google.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®