From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=217.140.110.172 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1793970932; b=hlex0UfPqlp0mtF55lNvZsyiMaoyKTAtjrIDlx9F1CtfmjxS0nESu9urvJ8+A9b2ETw0 czNLjt1QpJ6fa3LG7JqtYdA/VQllIRnSoRZpRcIxk6tFMEPw2LFWmB5xa+maXUhZkNhNT zhced5qhwmYb5Zs5aL1wDp1DOgqAVEB35zlnDwP8gS9cS0aJntnfD+P/9SnzcRzGKKphX 807F8M8R0y9M0Lrn3oXftb8wP/z5qM0DEE/Vi3ndHmLCnrCxNd/ibgNlALgCJ4RHr31rk w3LMbz0fe4oO9ydfG7IAgYHo6WyWuc/3ZVymVHsaciSGs2zpmQrrs49SiqYBAfHp2Bg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1793970932; h=DMARC-Filter:Received:Received:DKIM-Signature:Date:From:To:Cc: Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; bh=6TXkLHscwSMqxJsLbmecxFsJw68c+CWaCGWTtaOz1TU=; b=fUSoqnnTXPsW/fuDN0mZNpElxnJgewV8qzmdHlsds0MUrvNiB/1kJ0mAJo1XyZiOgzQ+ jUSoZbYF1hgoKzj5JmMC7ZI7ySN0P7GE+HexO+c+hFVM9Gjn2qKs9zXqpAs0MdRjZhKjr N+tS3oEtKBe4KW/bTE26tzcfbz0Wb6+qX5ya2oWtHzC/5Bh6FUPe24Ar4gUpm8gLgZpxq Ze8jXLEf5miYcNO6b1PMmsrwF4nwEKVAuoaKPdlRmcOQtn9jqAtBZQfWmlOTvJm9QCsMU 9yZ6s0xajHFxYKejZij3vEBYrgs8s6fSBwbyr1eSSIengRZ512vKhDJgIMBT8VsX+5w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass header.from=arm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; dkim=pass header.d=arm.com header.i=@arm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=foss header.b="bVLFw/pv"; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=217.140.110.172 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 003B3606A33A for ; Fri, 6 Nov 2026 13:15:30 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp.subspace.kernel.org 003B3606A33A Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=arm.com header.i=@arm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=foss header.b=bVLFw/pv Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 054A21596; Fri, 6 Nov 2026 05:15:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from e129823.arm.com (e129823.arm.com [10.2.213.3]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 232E33F628; Fri, 6 Nov 2026 05:15:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=arm.com; s=foss; t=1793970930; bh=Oc8nVxfpMQKJNDpsFeRnkG5aGJsyD4jQTTT2hvVB/ZA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=bVLFw/pvUgSmVuQ7mtMONAlEQZ+X/4aGTifq/SNv8S6MB50rGt0Vk2B8CRnaXOs65 GKcIegd54xg0BNbFjSGPQufYPOjDAO+o12gJLw758dv8nUiDkOgPXYCQZGUGQ21IGY JvtOPLCYOUTxMc1ypMdmW1SvBRiOxbUf55/sKNyg= Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2026 13:15:25 +0000 From: Yeoreum Yun To: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" Cc: Yeoreum Yun , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lorenzo Stoakes , Jason Gunthorpe , John Hubbard , Peter Xu , "Liam R. Howlett" , Vlastimil Babka , Mike Rapoport , Suren Baghdasaryan , Michal Hocko , Andrew Morton , Rik van Riel , Yuan-Hao Hsu Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] mm: internal: fix inconsistent in folio_pte_batch_flags() for shadow stack Message-ID: References: <20261102-refactor_gup_fast-v2-0-bc1ac018c834@arm.com> <20261102-refactor_gup_fast-v2-2-bc1ac018c834@arm.com> <85c4a87b-2c8b-4ef5-bb30-6518080f8be0@kernel.org> <9a67e7f6-0ec6-414d-8689-c70eeed6100c@kernel.org> <5521e876-3edb-4862-8b45-96118a21ab6a@kernel.org> X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5521e876-3edb-4862-8b45-96118a21ab6a@kernel.org> On Fri, Nov 06, 2026 at 01:43:11PM +0100, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote: > On 11/6/26 10:21, Yeoreum Yun wrote: > >> On 11/2/26 15:07, Yeoreum Yun wrote: > >>> > >>> That's my preference too and we've discussed :) > >>> I'll repost with below unless anyone has any strong comment. > >> > >> Yes, best to wait a couple of days for people to catch up. > > > > If there is no comments for prohibiting to set VM_HUGEPAGE for > > shadow stack as David's suggestion, I'll post with this on early next > > week. > > Yes. Can you do me a favor and move the fix to #1 > Also, I think we'll CC stable. Acked. Thanks! -- Sincerely, Yeoreum Yun