On Thu, Nov 05, 2026 at 04:05:09PM +0200, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:
> Document 8-bit CPU parallel MIPI DBI Type B interface provided by
> Tegra20/30 SoCs display controller.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@gmail.com>
> ---
>  .../display/tegra/nvidia,tegra20-dbi.yaml     | 113 ++++++++++++++++++
>  .../display/tegra/nvidia,tegra20-dc.yaml      |  22 ++++
>  2 files changed, 135 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/tegra/nvidia,tegra20-dbi.yaml
> 
[...]
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/tegra/nvidia,tegra20-dc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/tegra/nvidia,tegra20-dc.yaml
> index 69be95afd5627..ffeb124905dbf 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/tegra/nvidia,tegra20-dc.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/tegra/nvidia,tegra20-dc.yaml
> @@ -79,6 +79,16 @@ properties:
>    rgb:
>      type: object
>  
> +  "#address-cells":
> +    const: 1
> +
> +  "#size-cells":
> +    const: 0
> +
> +patternProperties:
> +  "^dbi@[0-1]$":
> +    $ref: /schemas/display/tegra/nvidia,tegra20-dbi.yaml#

I think it might be better to group these under a separate dbi node at
the top-level, making it a sibling to the "rgb" node. If you add
#address-cells and #size-cells here, I think that means technically the
"rgb" is now in the same address space as those new dbi nodes and would
need its own "reg" property and such.

Thierry