mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Cc: will@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, pratyush@kernel.org,
	leitao@debian.org, mpilaniy@redhat.com, yeoreum.yun@arm.com,
	graf@amazon.com, pasha.tatashin@soleen.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, baoquan.he@linux.dev,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rppt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8] arm64: kexec_file: Stop using the Image text_offset
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2026 17:07:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <au4JOjnQlx2aSpiE@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261105125442.2282987-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com>

On Thu, Nov 05, 2026 at 08:54:42PM +0800, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
> image_load() adds text_offset to kernel_segment->mem and subtracts it
> from kernel_segment->memsz.  For CMA backed segments this breaks the
> load path: the payload is copied to page_address(cma), which is the CMA
> base, while image->start is set to the adjusted address, so kexec jumps
> into the middle of the kernel.  kimage_map_segment() has the same
> mismatch when a segment has been moved.
> 
> The adjusted memsz also breaks the release path: the CMA pages are
> freed using segment->memsz >> PAGE_SHIFT, which is fewer than were
> allocated, leaking the tail of the allocation.
> 
> Since commit 751c263bb74f ("arm64: remove TEXT_OFFSET randomization")

This commit only removed the randomisation. The one you want mentioned
here is cfa7ede20f13 ("arm64: set TEXT_OFFSET to 0x0 in preparation for
removing it entirely"). Although this removing never happened (see more
below).

> TEXT_OFFSET is always zero.  This has been upstream since v5.8, so no
> LTS kernel carries a non-zero text_offset.  Drop the adjustment and
> reject images with a non-zero value instead of booting them from a
> wrong address.  With the adjustment gone, segments stay at their CMA
> base and the release size matches the allocation.
> 
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260921090450.807575-2-ruanjinjie@huawei.com/
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260921090450.807575-3-ruanjinjie@huawei.com/
> Fixes: 07d24902977e ("kexec: enable CMA based contiguous allocation")
> Suggested-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
> ---
> v2:
> - Split out from the patch set.
> - Link to v7: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261026075201.699550-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com/
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kernel/kexec_image.c | 13 ++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/kexec_image.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/kexec_image.c
> index 78b1f956d8d7..7d6baea3d28f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/kexec_image.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/kexec_image.c
> @@ -80,12 +80,17 @@ static void *image_load(struct kimage *image,
>  	kbuf.bufsz = kernel_len;
>  	kbuf.mem = KEXEC_BUF_MEM_UNKNOWN;
>  	kbuf.memsz = le64_to_cpu(h->image_size);
> +	/*
> +	 * Pre-v5.8 images carry a non-zero text_offset, which is no longer
> +	 * honored; reject them instead of loading them at a wrong address.
> +	 */
>  	text_offset = le64_to_cpu(h->text_offset);
> +	if (text_offset) {
> +		pr_err("Unsupported Image text_offset 0x%lx\n", text_offset);
> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENOEXEC);
> +	}

If it's only CMA getting it wrong, can we not just set
image->no_cma = true here and continue as normal?

While text_offset is 0 now, I don't think we concluded it should be
deprecated. There was a recent push back on the attempt to document the
always 0 behaviour:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260604140839.1930847-1-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk/

-- 
Catalin

      reply	other threads:[~2026-11-06 17:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-05 12:54 Jinjie Ruan
2026-11-06 17:07 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=au4JOjnQlx2aSpiE@arm.com \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=baoquan.he@linux.dev \
    --cc=graf@amazon.com \
    --cc=leitao@debian.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mpilaniy@redhat.com \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    --cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®