From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Cc: will@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, pratyush@kernel.org,
leitao@debian.org, mpilaniy@redhat.com, yeoreum.yun@arm.com,
graf@amazon.com, pasha.tatashin@soleen.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, baoquan.he@linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rppt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8] arm64: kexec_file: Stop using the Image text_offset
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2026 17:07:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <au4JOjnQlx2aSpiE@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261105125442.2282987-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
On Thu, Nov 05, 2026 at 08:54:42PM +0800, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
> image_load() adds text_offset to kernel_segment->mem and subtracts it
> from kernel_segment->memsz. For CMA backed segments this breaks the
> load path: the payload is copied to page_address(cma), which is the CMA
> base, while image->start is set to the adjusted address, so kexec jumps
> into the middle of the kernel. kimage_map_segment() has the same
> mismatch when a segment has been moved.
>
> The adjusted memsz also breaks the release path: the CMA pages are
> freed using segment->memsz >> PAGE_SHIFT, which is fewer than were
> allocated, leaking the tail of the allocation.
>
> Since commit 751c263bb74f ("arm64: remove TEXT_OFFSET randomization")
This commit only removed the randomisation. The one you want mentioned
here is cfa7ede20f13 ("arm64: set TEXT_OFFSET to 0x0 in preparation for
removing it entirely"). Although this removing never happened (see more
below).
> TEXT_OFFSET is always zero. This has been upstream since v5.8, so no
> LTS kernel carries a non-zero text_offset. Drop the adjustment and
> reject images with a non-zero value instead of booting them from a
> wrong address. With the adjustment gone, segments stay at their CMA
> base and the release size matches the allocation.
>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260921090450.807575-2-ruanjinjie@huawei.com/
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260921090450.807575-3-ruanjinjie@huawei.com/
> Fixes: 07d24902977e ("kexec: enable CMA based contiguous allocation")
> Suggested-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
> ---
> v2:
> - Split out from the patch set.
> - Link to v7: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261026075201.699550-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com/
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/kexec_image.c | 13 ++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/kexec_image.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/kexec_image.c
> index 78b1f956d8d7..7d6baea3d28f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/kexec_image.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/kexec_image.c
> @@ -80,12 +80,17 @@ static void *image_load(struct kimage *image,
> kbuf.bufsz = kernel_len;
> kbuf.mem = KEXEC_BUF_MEM_UNKNOWN;
> kbuf.memsz = le64_to_cpu(h->image_size);
> + /*
> + * Pre-v5.8 images carry a non-zero text_offset, which is no longer
> + * honored; reject them instead of loading them at a wrong address.
> + */
> text_offset = le64_to_cpu(h->text_offset);
> + if (text_offset) {
> + pr_err("Unsupported Image text_offset 0x%lx\n", text_offset);
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOEXEC);
> + }
If it's only CMA getting it wrong, can we not just set
image->no_cma = true here and continue as normal?
While text_offset is 0 now, I don't think we concluded it should be
deprecated. There was a recent push back on the attempt to document the
always 0 behaviour:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260604140839.1930847-1-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk/
--
Catalin
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-06 17:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-05 12:54 Jinjie Ruan
2026-11-06 17:07 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=au4JOjnQlx2aSpiE@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baoquan.he@linux.dev \
--cc=graf@amazon.com \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mpilaniy@redhat.com \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®