From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=217.140.110.172 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1793986740; b=xxxohD7h+Zn2eZFmaqw/IezEqo8c4VOSU4DSZevOFbpi2kNyzQdNG3o7jA2+b8IOpxZ8 nUM0HrODGw283zb7ZxhW6X5KDOrUoTKzPqCICqRITf8dTG4ErLzK4qhxnvIBRPjl2Jsr2 Ey/x9V7XDmXKhMgh/If4QCtc/UUmfMWBhNskSdEHf/s5GJH+xEw3ogvjQMwglhiGH/KMm I6iPVyODt+0/YWRiDLmIN4VTTrJwLWc0qydHbi3+iCFvXJ1aGcCXczrkUJrZZGjEqccfO x1dmrMIg59mTjq+xo7SHK/6b4jrU51tw0ueILKbAcWGExgOVd8inholZoxiTPUS1kow== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1793986740; h=DMARC-Filter:Received:Received:DKIM-Signature:Date:From:To:Cc: Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; bh=V/Ki9KYCk1/u/T9+TLPXVuBQHKR32la5lHVotRJ9M9s=; b=DQxwYnlVWHY4ocTPsCDQ97qlRIGclI36XpECKlpJBV1WetjqYxXY9Hth7GwDLULGFzgJ nzw2PbTXL9dwB2g6vFN3h005AivU5bNJL6PKZXRV1g+zoltki1zSeEv5vaMRbL8z5gaoy c0vza1P012Ku0w+zW3aip282HISw6pbVSMjyM+fN6xv4Xb9QowCVfePMXC1KuYK7KHPfV nLjrakZhPC/X70G75UmM81MJ6FlX126XFvoDLRYHKvQ9rJ3MUwFPqlc/HJrKnWpp7htdd 3B5MtZoUu8PDjEivmmfSsWOFWj/naOPW5uH24jhWSO/6qOf3/xgJlKdzhZbf4BAa1iA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass header.from=arm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; dkim=pass header.d=arm.com header.i=@arm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=foss header.b=b46Iw0Is; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=217.140.110.172 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35BF4606EE86; Fri, 6 Nov 2026 17:38:58 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp.subspace.kernel.org 35BF4606EE86 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=arm.com header.i=@arm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=foss header.b=b46Iw0Is Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37C51153B; Fri, 6 Nov 2026 09:38:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from arm.com (usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E311E3F632; Fri, 6 Nov 2026 09:38:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=arm.com; s=foss; t=1793986738; bh=Au11w2LcZqWcY7AEya/LgeSWkZUdT+Gf4txaRTnYGZo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=b46Iw0Iszy98SNd2Ysmjz5/eWk+qZHyrwWByFkmfYCpUNGC07OVTzMcnxF6B1tl5u dZTZWdyX3pVaWzbzKvqFf9udxyzvhmX7DaqTMaxgvh4Yv2OTOSjVj8jg7gV6rC2rGe vY5mjfipkuqKnqSBvbDhhZiwbQO82z5CZBo8whm8= Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2026 17:38:53 +0000 From: Catalin Marinas To: Kiryl Shutsemau Cc: Will Deacon , Mark Rutland , James Morse , Usama Arif , Marc Zyngier , Doug Anderson , Breno Leitao , Jinjie Ruan , Ada Couprie Diaz , Vladimir Murzin , Linus Walleij , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Huth , Dawei Li , mrigendrachaubey , kernel-team@meta.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] arm64: sdei: Run the event handler on the kernel vectors Message-ID: References: <20261105120835.3321912-1-kirill@shutemov.name> <20261105120835.3321912-2-kirill@shutemov.name> X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Fri, Nov 06, 2026 at 11:48:00AM +0000, Kiryl Shutsemau wrote: > On Thu, Nov 05, 2026 at 06:37:46PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > Worth a separate patch to fix SDEI handling with pseudo-NMI on and no > > changes to __this_cpu_read() above needed. So, for this patch: > > > > Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas > > Thanks! > > Would it still make sense to switch to raw_cpu_read() in this patch for > stable@? The splat is new with this patch, so without it stable trees > would also need the PMR fix. > > Let me know if you want a re-spin with raw_cpu_read(). No need to respin, I can fix it locally. -- Catalin