From: Kyle Zeng <kylebot@openai.com>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
coreteam@netfilter.org, bridge@lists.linux.dev,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
outbounddisclosures@openai.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: br_netfilter: reject unsafe neighbour devices for DNAT
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2026 02:28:58 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <au79avuyDAz__s4t@com-75606> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <au7SdYQrIqAQOU24@strlen.de>
On Sat, Nov 07, 2026 at 08:25:41AM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Kyle Zeng <kylebot@openai.com> wrote:
> > The IPv4 and IPv6 bridge prerouting callbacks classify DNAT traffic using
> > the logical input device saved in skb->dev. The physical input port can
> > have a different bridge master when prerouting resumes, for example after
> > an NFQUEUE verdict. Netfilter reassembly can also combine the first
> > fragment's bridge information with a different fragment's input device.
> >
> > br_nf_pre_routing_finish_bridge() replaces skb->dev with the port's
> > current bridge master, but looks up the neighbour using the existing
> > route. This can put an skb with skb->dev pointing to bridge B on an
> > unresolved neighbour of bridge A. Deleting B and resolving the neighbour
> > on A then causes a use-after-free in __dev_queue_xmit().
> >
> > Before calling the neighbour output method, check that the neighbour
> > keeps skb->dev alive. A neighbour holds its device, and a VLAN device
> > also holds its real device, so allow a VLAN whose real device is the
> > bridge. Release the neighbour and drop the skb on a mismatch.
> >
> > Doing this in the shared continuation covers both protocol families,
> > including a queue in the remaining bridge prerouting hooks. Leave the
> > cached-header path unchanged since it does not enqueue the skb.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kyle Zeng <kylebot@openai.com>
> > ---
> > I have a reproducer for this issue and can share via DM
> >
> > net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c b/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c
> > index e15355ff215a..726a2d17ed3a 100644
> > --- a/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c
> > +++ b/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c
> > @@ -307,6 +307,18 @@ int br_nf_pre_routing_finish_bridge(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_
> >
> > ret = br_handle_frame_finish(net, sk, skb);
> > } else {
> > + struct net_device *dev = neigh->dev;
> > +
> > + /* The neighbour queue must keep skb->dev alive. A VLAN
> > + * device also holds a reference to its real device.
> > + */
> > + if (is_vlan_dev(dev))
> > + dev = vlan_dev_real_dev(dev);
> > + if (dev != skb->dev) {
> > + neigh_release(neigh);
> > + goto free_skb;
> > + }
> > +
>
> I don't understand the vlan check. Why is that needed?
> The call to br_nf_pre_routing_finish_bridge is gated via:
>
> 405 if (skb_dst(skb)->dev == dev) {
> 406 skb->dev = br_indev;
> 407 nf_bridge_update_protocol(skb);
> 408 nf_bridge_push_encap_header(skb);
> 409 br_nf_hook_thresh(NF_BR_PRE_ROUTING,
> 410 net, sk, skb, skb->dev,
> 411 NULL,
> 412 br_nf_pre_routing_finish_bridge);
>
>
> ... so this patch ought to be sufficient?
>
> --- a/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c
> @@ -283,6 +283,10 @@ int br_nf_pre_routing_finish_bridge(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_
> if (!skb->dev)
> goto free_skb;
> dst = skb_dst(skb);
> +
> + if (dst->dev != skb->dev)
> + goto free_skb;
> +
> neigh = dst_neigh_lookup_skb(dst, skb);
>
> (I can't see how neigh->dev != skb->dev after the extra test).
The VLAN check is intended to preserve existing VLAN DNAT behavior.
bridge-nf-filter-vlan-tagged=1, bridge-nf-pass-vlan-input-dev=1, and br0.100, the earlier test can pass with
dst->dev == dev == br0.100. The continuation then changes skb->dev to br0, so the strict comparison would
drop that valid packet.
A neighbour on br0.100 is safe here because it holds the VLAN device, which holds its underlying bridge. That is why the slow-path check compares the neighbour´s underlying device with skb->dev.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-07 10:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-30 4:21 Kyle Zeng
2026-10-30 4:23 ` netdev-bot+sinfo
2026-10-31 18:50 ` Florian Westphal
2026-11-07 7:25 ` Florian Westphal
2026-11-07 10:28 ` Kyle Zeng [this message]
2026-11-07 12:10 ` Florian Westphal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=au79avuyDAz__s4t@com-75606 \
--to=kylebot@openai.com \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=outbounddisclosures@openai.com \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®