From: Kayra Cizmeci <kayracizmeci@gmail.com>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, vschneid@redhat.com,
kprateek.nayak@amd.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
lukasz.luba@arm.com, rafael@kernel.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, tj@kernel.org, void@manifault.com,
arighi@nvidia.com, changwoo@igalia.com,
sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, qyousef@layalina.io,
christian.loehle@arm.com, pierre.gondois@arm.com,
sshegde@linux.ibm.com, tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/20 v3] sched/eevdf: Add min slice check when selecting CPU
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2026 11:57:12 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <au7SabL5pfbsApyB@scheduler.schedules> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261106151947.3991524-7-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Hi Vincent,
Sashiko reviewed this one so I'll just put here my own concerns instead
of repeating.
On Fri, Nov 06, 2026 at 04:19:33PM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> Add a new level for selecting CPU when select_task_rq_fair() fails to find
> an idle CPU. This last level compares the min slice to select a CPU where
> the task could run 1st.
> This helps a waking task to select a CPU where a longer slice runs
> instead of one where a task with the same or shorter slice already runs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
> ---
> kernel/sched/core.c | 2 +-
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 157 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> 2 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 031efe7d49fb..d71da9069218 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -9012,7 +9012,7 @@ void __init sched_init(void)
> rq->sd = NULL;
> rq->rd = NULL;
> rq->cpu_capacity = SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE;
> - rq->min_slice = ULONG_MAX;
> + rq->min_slice = 0;
> rq->balance_callback = &balance_push_callback;
> rq->active_balance = 0;
> rq->next_balance = jiffies;
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index cfc99b94d9ce..039dce244aaa 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -8842,11 +8842,25 @@ static inline int sched_balance_find_dst_cpu(struct sched_domain *sd, struct tas
> return new_cpu;
> }
>
> -static inline int __select_idle_cpu(int cpu, struct task_struct *p)
> +static inline bool choose_sched_slice_rq(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
> {
> - if (choose_idle_cpu(cpu, p) && sched_cpu_cookie_match(cpu_rq(cpu), p))
> + if (p->se.slice < get_rq_min_slice(rq))
> + return true;
> +
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int __select_idle_cpu(int cpu, struct task_struct *p, int *slice_cpu)
> +{
> + if (!sched_cpu_cookie_match(cpu_rq(cpu), p))
> + return -1;
> +
> + if (choose_idle_cpu(cpu, p))
> return cpu;
>
> + if (*slice_cpu == -1 && choose_sched_slice_rq(cpu_rq(cpu), p))
> + *slice_cpu = cpu;
> +
> return -1;
> }
Look here:
CPU1: CPU2:
FA RA
FC
CPU2 has 1 RT and 1 Fair tasks named RA and FC.
Let's say RA is running on CPU2 and FC's slice is 10 ms.
And let's say FA has 8 ms slice, and a fair task named TC is waking up
with 9 ms slice:
* We look to CPU1, 9 < 8 is false so we return false
* We look to CPU2, 9 < 10 is true so we return it.
But the problem is, CPU2 has a RT task running and we are going to
compete with the RT task. In that case it can be worse than CPU1.
So, I would suggest something like this or so:
(My editor got crazy, so I had to copy this diff :<)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 262626455497..8b0dd858f332 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -8876,10 +8876,8 @@ static inline int sched_balance_find_dst_cpu(struct sched_domain *sd, struct tas
static inline bool choose_sched_slice_rq(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
{
- if (p->se.slice < get_rq_min_slice(rq))
- return true;
-
- return false;
+ return p->se.slice < get_rq_min_slice(rq) &&
+ READ_ONCE(rq->curr)->sched_class == &fair_sched_class;
}
static inline int __select_idle_cpu(int cpu, struct task_struct *p, int *slice_cpu)
@@ -9193,7 +9191,6 @@ select_idle_capacity(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int target)
bool has_idle_core = sched_smt_active() && test_idle_cores(target);
unsigned long task_util, util_min, util_max, best_cap = 0;
int fits, best_fits = ASYM_IDLE_THREAD_MISFIT;
- unsigned long task_slice;
int cpu, best_cpu = -1;
struct cpumask *cpus;
int nr = INT_MAX;
@@ -9204,7 +9201,6 @@ select_idle_capacity(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int target)
task_util = task_util_est(p);
util_min = uclamp_eff_value(p, UCLAMP_MIN);
util_max = uclamp_eff_value(p, UCLAMP_MAX);
- task_slice = p->se.slice;
if (sched_feat(SIS_UTIL) && sd->shared) {
/*
@@ -9260,7 +9256,7 @@ select_idle_capacity(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int target)
else if (fits > 0)
fits = ASYM_IDLE_THREAD_FITS;
- } else if (fits > 0 && task_slice < get_rq_min_slice(cpu_rq(cpu))) {
+ } else if (fits > 0 && choose_sched_slice_rq(cpu_rq(cpu), p)) {
fits = ASYM_BUSY_THREAD_FITS;
cpu_cap = get_actual_cpu_capacity(cpu);
} else {
Cheers,
Kayra :-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-07 8:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-06 15:19 [PATCH 00/18 v3] Improving latency of short slice tasks Vincent Guittot
2026-11-06 15:19 ` [PATCH 01/20 v3] sched/eevdf: Decay positive lag of sleeping entities Vincent Guittot
2026-11-06 15:19 ` [PATCH 02/20 v3] sched/eevdf: Reset lag at wakeup when prev CPU has been idle Vincent Guittot
2026-11-06 16:22 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-11-06 15:19 ` [PATCH 03/20 v3] sched/eevdf: Reset lag at wakeup when migrating and prev " Vincent Guittot
2026-11-06 18:05 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-11-06 15:19 ` [PATCH 04/20 v3] sched/eevdf: Reset lag when waking up on idle cpu Vincent Guittot
2026-11-06 18:39 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-11-06 15:19 ` [PATCH 05/20 v3] sched/eevdf: Add per cpu cached min_slice Vincent Guittot
2026-11-07 6:53 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-11-06 15:19 ` [PATCH 06/20 v3] sched/eevdf: Add min slice check when selecting CPU Vincent Guittot
2026-11-07 8:57 ` Kayra Cizmeci [this message]
2026-11-06 15:19 ` [PATCH 07/20 v3] sched/fair: Prepare select_task_rq_fair() to be called for new cases Vincent Guittot
2026-11-06 15:19 ` [PATCH 08/20 v3] sched/fair: Add push task mechanism for fair Vincent Guittot
2026-11-06 15:19 ` [PATCH 09/20 v3] sched/fair: Optimize " Vincent Guittot
2026-11-06 15:19 ` [PATCH 10/20 v3] sched/core: Add rq flag to tick parameters Vincent Guittot
2026-11-06 15:19 ` [PATCH 11/20 v3] sched/fair: Add force push task mechanism for fair Vincent Guittot
2026-11-06 15:19 ` [PATCH 12/20 v3] sched/fair: Support not wakeup case in select_idle_sibling Vincent Guittot
2026-11-06 15:19 ` [PATCH 13/20] sched/eevdf: Try to push short slice task on a better CPU Vincent Guittot
2026-11-06 15:19 ` [PATCH 14/20 v3] sched/eevdf: Push short slice task that are not picked Vincent Guittot
2026-11-06 15:19 ` [PATCH 15/20 v3] sched/fair: Enable push task for preempt short Vincent Guittot
2026-11-06 15:19 ` [PATCH 16/20 v3] energy model: Add a get previous state function Vincent Guittot
2026-11-06 15:19 ` [PATCH 17/20 v3] sched/fair: Rework feec() to use cost instead of spare capacity Vincent Guittot
2026-11-06 15:19 ` [PATCH 18/20 v3] energy model: Remove unused em_cpu_energy() Vincent Guittot
2026-11-06 15:19 ` [PATCH 19/20 v3] sched/fair: Take into account slice in EAS Vincent Guittot
2026-11-06 15:19 ` [PATCH 20/20 v3] sched/fair: Fix tasks stacking on same idle CPU Vincent Guittot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=au7SabL5pfbsApyB@scheduler.schedules \
--to=kayracizmeci@gmail.com \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=christian.loehle@arm.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pierre.gondois@arm.com \
--cc=qyousef@layalina.io \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®