From: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
To: Slawomir Stepien <sst@poczta.fm>
Cc: a.hindborg@kernel.org, k.opasiak@samsung.com,
nab@linux-iscsi.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
syzbot+b3410eb576b568216ae5@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] configfs: give the root inode its own lockdep class
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2026 05:51:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <auCeMlxBJ0DyaF6S@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261022134443.1122318-2-sst@poczta.fm>
On Thu, Oct 22, 2026 at 03:44:43PM +0200, Slawomir Stepien wrote:
> configfs_depend_item_unlocked() is meant to be called from configfs
> callbacks, where VFS already holds directory inode locks and configfs
> holds the subsystem's su_mutex. When the target item lives in another
> subsystem, it additionally locks the configfs root inode so that the
> target subsystem cannot be unregistered underneath it.
>
> The root inode shares the &sb->s_type->i_mutex_key lockdep class with
> every user-created configfs directory, so lockdep cannot tell it apart
> from the directory inode locks taken by mkdir, rmdir and symlink. Any
> lock held by the depend caller therefore looks like it nests both
> inside and outside "the" configfs inode lock. f_tcm's usbg_make_tpg(),
> which depends on a gadget function item from the target subsystem's
> mkdir callback, triggers this in two ways:
>
> target su_mutex -> root inode (depend), while
> rmdir under target/: directory inode -> target su_mutex
>
> tpg_instances_lock -> root inode (depend), while
> mkdir functions/tcm.N: directory inode -> gadget su_mutex ->
> func_lock -> tpg_instances_lock (tcm_alloc_inst())
>
> Neither is a real deadlock, because no holder of the root inode lock
> waits for su_mutex, tpg_instances_lock or a directory inode lock held
> by a depend caller:
>
> - configfs_depend_item() and configfs_depend_item_unlocked() only look
> up the subsystem and scan the tree under configfs_dirent_lock, a
> spinlock.
> - Lookup and readdir in the configfs root only take
> configfs_dirent_lock. mkdir and symlink in the root fail with
> -EPERM before any other lock is taken, and configfs_rmdir() of a
> subsystem directory never gets as far as taking su_mutex.
> - configfs_register_subsystem() only locks the inodes of the new
> subsystem directory it is creating, which nobody else can hold yet.
> - configfs_unregister_subsystem() does wait for the subsystem
> directory's inode lock, but it only runs from the subsystem module's
> exit path. Every mkdir and rmdir in that subsystem holds a reference
> on the module, so none of them can be in progress at that point.
>
> Put the root inode's i_rwsem into its own lock class so that lockdep
> stops aliasing it with ordinary directory inodes. Splitting a class
> cannot create new lockdep cycles, and real dependencies on the root
> inode are still tracked under the new class. This is an annotation
> only: without CONFIG_LOCKDEP the key is empty and lockdep_set_class()
> compiles away.
>
> Fixes: d79d75b5c518 ("fs: configfs: Add unlocked version of configfs_depend_item()")
> Reported-by: syzbot+b3410eb576b568216ae5@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=b3410eb576b568216ae5
> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-5-5
> Signed-off-by: Slawomir Stepien <sst@poczta.fm>
Reviewed-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-27 12:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-22 13:44 [PATCH 1/2] configfs: handle unlinked target in configfs_depend_item_unlocked() Slawomir Stepien
2026-10-22 13:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] configfs: give the root inode its own lockdep class Slawomir Stepien
2026-10-27 12:51 ` Breno Leitao [this message]
2026-10-27 12:50 ` [PATCH 1/2] configfs: handle unlinked target in configfs_depend_item_unlocked() Breno Leitao
2026-10-27 13:27 ` Breno Leitao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=auCeMlxBJ0DyaF6S@gmail.com \
--to=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=a.hindborg@kernel.org \
--cc=k.opasiak@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nab@linux-iscsi.org \
--cc=sst@poczta.fm \
--cc=syzbot+b3410eb576b568216ae5@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®