From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>,
Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
"open list:KEYS/KEYRINGS" <keyrings@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:SECURITY SUBSYSTEM"
<linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KEYS: key_garbage_collector(): process in chunks
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2026 03:35:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <auFRayCXdvaZYH9R@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261027235820.2002072-1-jarkko@kernel.org>
On Wed, Oct 28, 2026 at 01:58:19AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> key_garbage_collector() has a design that is not resistant enough for
> workqueue lockups. The duration scales up relative to the number of items
> in the serial tree, which causes a reoccuring theme of being guilty of
> causing workqueue lockups.
>
> Resolve the problem by processing in chunks:
>
> 1. Declare a static variable key_gc_work, which owns the garbage collection
> in-flight state, and key_schedule_gc_work() for re-scheduling the work.
> 2. Define KEY_GC_CHUNK_SIZE, set to 1024 keys, as the bound for the number
> of items scanned and destroyed.
> 3. Define KEY_GC_DESTROYING to mark resume to destruction without repeating
> the RCU grace period. Drain the graveyard before advancing key-type
> reaping.
> 4. Define KEY_GC_REAP_REQUESTED for preserving full-pass requests across
> the continuations.
>
> The following test was performed:
>
> 1. Add 499995 "unused" keys.
> 2. Add 499994 "expiring" keys i.e., keys with expiration times.
> 3. Clear the first keyring.
> 4. Wait for the timeouts expire from the second.
>
> When tested with QEMU using x86-64 and aarch64 (emulated) architectures the
> elapsed the results were the following:
>
> - x86-64: chunk max: 125 ms, total increase: 5%
> - aarch64: chunk max: 235 ms, total increase: 6%
>
> Tests were performed using a laptop with AMD 4650U Zen 2 archtitecture CPU.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
architecture
>
> Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
Sashiko: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261027235820.2002072-1-jarkko%40kernel.org
Br, Jarkko
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-28 1:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-27 23:58 Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-10-28 1:35 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=auFRayCXdvaZYH9R@kernel.org \
--to=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®