From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
To: Yingjie Wang <1075151112@qq.com>
Cc: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, axboe@kernel.dk, hch@lst.de,
sagi@grimberg.me, kch@nvidia.com, hare@suse.de, corbet@lwn.net,
skhan@linuxfoundation.org, rdunlap@infradead.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] nvme-tcp: validate TLS handshake timeout parameters
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2026 09:33:01 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <auIVrTJVjWk8rvNc@kbusch-mbp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <tencent_8B4F08A2DD4BB093ED7FAECFFD20272B3C07@qq.com>
On Wed, Oct 28, 2026 at 07:57:18PM +0800, Yingjie Wang wrote:
> The NVMe/TCP host and target expose writable tls_handshake_timeout
> parameters as signed integers. Both paths multiply the value by
> MSEC_PER_SEC and HZ before converting the results to unsigned timeout
> types. Large positive and negative values can therefore give the
> handshake agent and the kernel different, unintended timeouts.
>
> On an HZ=1000 kernel, setting the parameter to 2147484 overflows both
> multiplications. On the target, an accepted pending request can queue the
> timeout work on the next timer-wheel advance while the handshake agent
> was given about 24.9 days. On the host, schedule_timeout() can report a
> wrong timeout value with a stack dump and fail the handshake immediately.
>
> Make each parameter unsigned and reject values that do not fit both the
> handshake agent's millisecond field and a safe jiffies delay. Read the
> parameter once per handshake so the two timeout mechanisms use the same
> value. Also keep the host completion-wait result in a long: a successful
> wait can return more than INT_MAX remaining jiffies for an accepted
> timeout.
Thanks, applied to nvme-7.4.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-28 15:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-28 11:57 Yingjie Wang
2026-10-28 15:33 ` Keith Busch [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=auIVrTJVjWk8rvNc@kbusch-mbp \
--to=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=1075151112@qq.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kch@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®