From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
To: Seiji Nishikawa <snishika@redhat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@kernel.org>,
Chris Leech <cleech@redhat.com>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme-tcp: fix io_work priority inversion when send_mutex is held
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2026 09:37:51 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <auIWzzvH28ubRoF5@kbusch-mbp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261014064524.4015025-1-snishika@redhat.com>
On Wed, Oct 14, 2026 at 03:45:24PM +0900, Seiji Nishikawa wrote:
> Commit f42d4796ee10 ("nvme-tcp: fix I/O stalls on congested sockets")
> added a check in nvme_tcp_io_work() that sets pending to true when the
> queue has pending requests and the socket is writeable. The check is
> placed after the mutex_trylock() block, so it also runs when
> mutex_trylock(&queue->send_mutex) failed and io_work did not send
> anything.
>
> When .queue_rq sends a request directly from its own context, it holds
> send_mutex and can give up the CPU in lock_sock_nested() when another
> task needs the CPU, for example the io_work kworker of the same queue,
> which runs on the same CPU. Then io_work cannot take send_mutex, but
> the requests are still on req_list and the socket is writeable, so
> pending is set to true. io_work loops until the deadline and queues
> itself again on io_cpu, without sleeping.
>
> This is a priority inversion. io_work runs on the high priority
> nvme_tcp_wq and cannot make progress until send_mutex is released, but
> it keeps running. The task holding send_mutex runs at normal priority
> and needs the CPU to release it. The scheduler keeps giving the CPU to
> io_work, so the task holding send_mutex may not run again, and the
> requests on the queue are not sent and time out.
Thanks, applied to nvme-7.4.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-28 15:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-14 6:45 Seiji Nishikawa
2026-10-21 10:04 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-10-23 12:23 ` Seiji Nishikawa
2026-10-28 10:28 ` Seiji Nishikawa
2026-10-28 15:37 ` Keith Busch [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=auIWzzvH28ubRoF5@kbusch-mbp \
--to=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cleech@redhat.com \
--cc=hare@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=snishika@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®