From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Nanzhe Zhao <nzzhao.sigma@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>,
Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>, Juan Yescas <jyescas@google.com>,
Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dev Jain <Dev.Jain@arm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <David.Hildenbrand@arm.com>,
Pengfei Li <lipengfei28@xiaomi.com>,
Bo Zhang <zhangbo56@xiaomi.com>,
Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>,
Nanzhe Zhao <nzzhao@126.com>, Nanzhe Zhao <zhaonanzhe@xiaomi.com>,
Ryan Roberts <Ryan.Roberts@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v8 00/15] f2fs: support & optimize large folios for writable files
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2026 17:34:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <auIyM-RmQE3rx1XL@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261028154407.1601430-1-nzzhao.sigma@gmail.com>
Hi Nanzhe,
I applied this series on top of the latest mainline having page private patches
where I had to clean up some conflicts. Could you please check dev-test branch?
Thanks,
On 10/28, Nanzhe Zhao wrote:
> From: Nanzhe Zhao <zhaonanzhe@xiaomi.com>
>
> This series supports large folios for most readable/writable files
> in buffered I/O paths, including normal files, block-layer encrypted
> files, and atomic files except for inline-data files, compressed files,
> and quota files.
>
> It also extends f2fs_folio_state to coexist with f2fs page-private
> flags and to handle large folio write path and partial truncate of
> large folios correctly. A valid large folio always carries a
> f2fs_folio_state at its folio->private in the current implementation.
>
> Benchmark details can be found in the RFC v2 cover letter:
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260622160830.324455-1-zhaonanzhe@xiaomi.com
>
> Changes in v8:
> - 01/15: add a sanity check in f2fs_folio_has_ffs(): if a large folio
> carries non-pointer private data (PAGE_PRIVATE_NOT_POINTER), report
> it with f2fs_bug_on() and return false instead of casting the value
> to a struct f2fs_folio_state pointer.
> - 03/15: cache sbi before dropping read_pages_pending, so
> f2fs_finish_read_bio() no longer uses F2FS_F_SB(folio) after a sync
> reader has been woken up and may have released the folio.
> - 05/15: clear the dirty bits of the whole folio on success, otherwise
> post-EOF subpages (e.g. fill_zero() with FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE, or a
> block migration beyond EOF) keep the folio redirtied forever;
> - recheck cp_error after f2fs_balance_fs() or the trylock_op() backoff
> dropped the folio lock, and drop the folio instead of writing on a
> filesystem which can no longer checkpoint;
> - reset the per-folio submitted counter for each dirty range.
> - 07/15: since the whole valid range below will be marked dirty, a large
> folio whose subpage was invalidated by a racing collapse/insert/punch
> hole is not usable; after folio_lock(), unlock it and return
> VM_FAULT_NOPAGE (-EFAULT) so the faulting access is retried instead
> of dirtying the stale subpages.
> - 08/15: keep PAGE_PRIVATE_GCING on a failed GC write which redirties
> the folio, and clear it only when no dirty subpage is left; mark the
> target subpage dirty in f2fs_defragment_range() and
> f2fs_migrate_blocks(); and submit the cached bio before unlocking a
> large folio in move_data_page() to avoid an AB-BA deadlock with
> WB_SYNC_ALL.
> - 15/15: make redirty_blocks() large-folio aware: allocate the
> f2fs_folio_state and mark the cluster range dirty. This is mainly
> for the chattr +c (FS_IOC_SETFLAGS) case, where the compression flag
> is set on an inode that keeps using large folios until it is evicted;
> since F2FS_IOC_COMPRESS_FILE is already rejected for large-folio
> mappings, this hint state is only reachable through chattr +c.
> Without this, F2FS_IOC_DECOMPRESS_FILE and
> F2FS_IOC_RELEASE_COMPRESS_BLOCKS would find no dirty range and
> silently skip the rewrite.
>
> Many thanks to Chao for the detailed v7 review; several of the fixes
> above are folded in from his suggestions.
>
> Changes in v7:
> - 01/15: realloc the f2fs_folio_state in f2fs_get_lock_data_folio() if
> it was released while the folio was unlocked.
> - 04/15: on an atomic buffered write repeat if folio was unlocked, check the
> COW block before reserving it again, so inc_atomic_write_cnt() is not called twice.
> - 08/15: clear PAGE_PRIVATE_GCING if large folio has no dirty sub pages
> when f2fs_trylock_op() fails before any write is submitted in f2fs_do_write_data_page().
>
> No other functional changes.
>
> Changes in v6:
> - Rebased onto the f2fs dev branch (fd106ada4dee).
> - v5 12/16 ("f2fs: wait for folio writeback before ffs_detach_free")
> is dropped, because the lkp warning reported by [1] was caused by a
> write_pages_pending leak on the GC truncate path.
>
> - Improve large-folio support in the f2fs_do_write_data_page() path used
> by GC:
> - 05/15: use __folio_start_writeback(folio, folio_test_dirty(folio))
> in both the IPU and OPU paths, so a single-subpage GC write does not
> clear PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE while other subpages are still dirty [3].
> - 05/15: add f2fs_ffs_put_write_pending() as the common writeback
> completion helper; do_write_block() only ends writeback for order-0
> folios.
> - 08/15: move the write_pages_pending increment from move_data_page()
> into f2fs_do_write_data_page(), take it only after
> __folio_start_writeback(), and drop it on every error path.
> move_data_page() no longer adjusts write_pages_pending or clears
> gcing on error [1].
>
> - 02/15: compute bio_offset/bio_len against the folio actually added to
> the bio [5].
>
> - 05/15, 06/15: fix the order-0 dirty accounting leak in the cp_error
> path [2].
>
> - 10/15: allocate ffs before f2fs_truncate_read_extent() [4].
>
> - 11/15: move the existing truncated-page handling into
> f2fs_clear_truncated_page_state() and reuse it for the subpage-aware
> large-folio writeback path, including the -ENOENT/NULL_ADDR case [2].
>
> Link to v5: [6]
>
> Many thanks to Chao, Daeho and Jaegeuk for the reviews, and to the
> kernel test robot for the report.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202610081027.b13dcf10-lkp@intel.com
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/6be679d1-d8ab-41b3-9975-1f1bcd552579@kernel.org
> [3] https://lore.kernel.org/r/fc101bc7-6ece-4a30-9e19-9b32376489a8@kernel.org
> [4] https://lore.kernel.org/r/36220ef3-5b00-4aa1-ad11-60b10857a886@kernel.org
> [5] https://lore.kernel.org/r/atA8dsZ35E6wTMD6@google.com
> [6] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20261014064445.2835813-1-zhaonanzhe@xiaomi.com/
>
> Nanzhe Zhao (15):
> f2fs: extend folio state for large folio write path
> f2fs: carry subpage offset and count in write IO
> f2fs: support regular file buffered writes on large folios
> f2fs: support atomic file large folios buffered write
> f2fs: support large folio writeback
> f2fs: account large folio dirty data at block granularity
> f2fs: prepare mmap write faults for large folios
> f2fs: make GC migration large-folio aware
> f2fs: optimize small block size large folio read
> f2fs: support partial uptodate large folio read
> f2fs: handle partial truncate of large folio dirty subpages
> f2fs: fix zeroing paths for large folios
> f2fs: handle block cloning within the same large folio
> f2fs: allow large folio support to writeable files
> f2fs: make compressed files compatible with large folio
>
> Documentation/filesystems/f2fs.rst | 10 +
> fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 40 +-
> fs/f2fs/compress.c | 7 +-
> fs/f2fs/data.c | 1550 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> fs/f2fs/dir.c | 2 +-
> fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 182 +++-
> fs/f2fs/file.c | 269 +++--
> fs/f2fs/gc.c | 51 +-
> fs/f2fs/inline.c | 3 +-
> fs/f2fs/inode.c | 4 +-
> fs/f2fs/namei.c | 1 +
> fs/f2fs/node.c | 2 +-
> fs/f2fs/segment.c | 13 +-
> 13 files changed, 1869 insertions(+), 265 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.43.0
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-28 17:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-28 15:43 Nanzhe Zhao
2026-10-28 15:43 ` [PATCH v8 01/15] f2fs: extend folio state for large folio write path Nanzhe Zhao
2026-10-28 15:43 ` [PATCH v8 02/15] f2fs: carry subpage offset and count in write IO Nanzhe Zhao
2026-10-28 15:43 ` [PATCH v8 03/15] f2fs: support regular file buffered writes on large folios Nanzhe Zhao
2026-10-28 15:43 ` [PATCH v8 04/15] f2fs: support atomic file large folios buffered write Nanzhe Zhao
2026-10-28 15:43 ` [PATCH v8 05/15] f2fs: support large folio writeback Nanzhe Zhao
2026-10-28 15:43 ` [PATCH v8 06/15] f2fs: account large folio dirty data at block granularity Nanzhe Zhao
2026-10-28 15:43 ` [PATCH v8 07/15] f2fs: prepare mmap write faults for large folios Nanzhe Zhao
2026-10-28 15:43 ` [PATCH v8 08/15] f2fs: make GC migration large-folio aware Nanzhe Zhao
2026-10-28 15:44 ` [PATCH v8 09/15] f2fs: optimize small block size large folio read Nanzhe Zhao
2026-10-28 15:44 ` [PATCH v8 10/15] f2fs: support partial uptodate " Nanzhe Zhao
2026-10-28 15:44 ` [PATCH v8 11/15] f2fs: handle partial truncate of large folio dirty subpages Nanzhe Zhao
2026-10-28 15:44 ` [PATCH v8 12/15] f2fs: fix zeroing paths for large folios Nanzhe Zhao
2026-10-28 15:44 ` [PATCH v8 13/15] f2fs: handle block cloning within the same large folio Nanzhe Zhao
2026-10-28 15:44 ` [PATCH v8 14/15] f2fs: allow large folio support to writeable files Nanzhe Zhao
2026-10-28 15:44 ` [PATCH v8 15/15] f2fs: make compressed files compatible with large folio Nanzhe Zhao
2026-10-28 17:34 ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=auIyM-RmQE3rx1XL@google.com \
--to=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=David.Hildenbrand@arm.com \
--cc=Dev.Jain@arm.com \
--cc=Ryan.Roberts@arm.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=daehojeong@google.com \
--cc=jyescas@google.com \
--cc=kaleshsingh@google.com \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lipengfei28@xiaomi.com \
--cc=nzzhao.sigma@gmail.com \
--cc=nzzhao@126.com \
--cc=zhangbo56@xiaomi.com \
--cc=zhaonanzhe@xiaomi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®