mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Kameron Carr <kameroncarr@linux.microsoft.com>
Cc: haiyangz@microsoft.com, wei.liu@kernel.org, decui@microsoft.com,
	mhklinux@outlook.com, will@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	lpieralisi@kernel.org, sudeep.holla@kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de,
	thuth@redhat.com, linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/6] firmware: smccc: Detect hypervisor via RSI host call in CCA Realms
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2026 22:54:21 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <auPOnb_9Jfzh-oQE@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261002215725.2015959-3-kameroncarr@linux.microsoft.com>

+ Suzuki

On Fri, Oct 02, 2026 at 02:57:21PM -0700, Kameron Carr wrote:
> Modify arm_smccc_hypervisor_has_uuid() to check is_realm_world() and
> use rsi_host_call() to query the hypervisor vendor UUID when inside a
> Realm. The realm path is factored into a helper,
> arm_smccc_realm_get_hypervisor_uuid(), that owns a file-static
> rsi_host_call buffer (uuid_hc) serialized by a spinlock.
> 
> The RSI-specific includes, file-static state and helper are guarded with
> CONFIG_ARM64 because <linux/arm-rsi-cmds.h> does not build on 32-bit
> ARM.
> 
> For non-Realm environments, the existing arm_smccc_1_1_invoke() path
> is unchanged.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kameron Carr <kameroncarr@linux.microsoft.com>
> ---
>  drivers/firmware/smccc/smccc.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/smccc/smccc.c b/drivers/firmware/smccc/smccc.c
> index afc2e4d..7e77170 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/smccc/smccc.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/smccc/smccc.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,12 @@
>  
>  #include <asm/archrandom.h>
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64
> +#include <linux/arm-rsi-cmds.h>
> +#include <linux/cleanup.h>
> +#include <linux/spinlock.h>
> +#endif
> +
>  static u32 smccc_version = ARM_SMCCC_VERSION_1_0;
>  static enum arm_smccc_conduit smccc_conduit = SMCCC_CONDUIT_NONE;
>  
> @@ -69,12 +75,45 @@ s32 arm_smccc_get_soc_id_revision(void)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(arm_smccc_get_soc_id_revision);
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64
> +static struct rsi_host_call uuid_hc;
> +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(uuid_hc_lock);
> +
> +/*
> + * Helper function to get the hypervisor UUID via an RsiHostCall.
> + */
> +static void arm_smccc_realm_get_hypervisor_uuid(struct arm_smccc_res *res)
> +{
> +	guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&uuid_hc_lock);
> +
> +	memset(&uuid_hc, 0, sizeof(uuid_hc));
> +	uuid_hc.gprs[0] = ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_CALL_UID_FUNC_ID;
> +
> +	if (rsi_host_call(__pa_symbol(&uuid_hc)) != RSI_SUCCESS) {
> +		res->a0 = SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED;
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	res->a0 = uuid_hc.gprs[0];
> +	res->a1 = uuid_hc.gprs[1];
> +	res->a2 = uuid_hc.gprs[2];
> +	res->a3 = uuid_hc.gprs[3];
> +}
> +#endif
> +
>  bool arm_smccc_hypervisor_has_uuid(const uuid_t *hyp_uuid)
>  {
>  	struct arm_smccc_res res = {};
>  	uuid_t uuid;
>  
> -	arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_CALL_UID_FUNC_ID, &res);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64
> +	if (is_realm_world())
> +		arm_smccc_realm_get_hypervisor_uuid(&res);
> +	else
> +#endif
> +		arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_CALL_UID_FUNC_ID,
> +				     &res);

Is this meant to be generic? I'm not sure the trick to pass
ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_CALL_UID_FUNC_ID in gprs[0] and forward it to the
host is a documented ABI. I think it even confuses other realm guests
that don't expect this (e.g. kvm_init_hyp_services()).

I thought realms should stick to the RSI interface and not try to guess
the host hypervisor. But if you do need this, a better fit would be in
hyperv_detect_via_smccc() (if realms don't boot with ACPI).

I'll leave it to Sudeep or Suzuki to comment further.

-- 
Catalin

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-29 22:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-02 21:57 [PATCH v5 0/6] arm64: hyperv: Add Realm support for Hyper-V Kameron Carr
2026-10-02 21:57 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] arm64: rsi: Add RSI host call structure and helper function Kameron Carr
2026-10-22  7:41   ` Wei Liu
2026-10-29 22:55   ` Catalin Marinas
2026-10-02 21:57 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] firmware: smccc: Detect hypervisor via RSI host call in CCA Realms Kameron Carr
2026-10-29 22:54   ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2026-10-02 21:57 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] arm64: hyperv: Add per-CPU RSI host call infrastructure for " Kameron Carr
2026-10-02 21:57 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] Drivers: hv: Mark shared memory as decrypted " Kameron Carr
2026-10-02 21:57 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] arm64: hyperv: Route hypercalls through RSI host call in " Kameron Carr
2026-10-02 21:57 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] arm64: hyperv: Implement hv_is_isolation_supported() for " Kameron Carr

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=auPOnb_9Jfzh-oQE@arm.com \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=decui@microsoft.com \
    --cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
    --cc=kameroncarr@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mhklinux@outlook.com \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@kernel.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=wei.liu@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®