From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: Tal Zussman <tz2294@columbia.edu>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/userfaultfd: store the child's new uffd context in the wait queue entry
Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2026 10:26:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aub3o-i3h2OVcWM-@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261031-uffd-fork-ctx-v1-1-a837fd576ffc@columbia.edu>
On Sat, Oct 31, 2026 at 11:47:48AM -0400, Tal Zussman wrote:
> A UFFD_EVENT_FORK message cannot carry the child's fd when it is queued,
> because the fd has to be installed in the fd table of whichever task
> reads the event. The forking task has to hand the reader the new context
> itself. It does that by casting the child's userfaultfd_ctx pointer into
> the arg.reserved.reserved1 field of the UAPI struct uffd_msg, which the
> readers cast back.
>
> That temporarily puts a kernel pointer in a struct that is copied to
> userspace, and results in ugly casts when passing the uffd context
> around. While resolve_userfault_fork() currently zeroes reserved1 before
> it is exposed to userspace, this unnecessarily risks leaking a kernel
> pointer to userspace if future modifications are buggy.
>
> Store the fork_ctx pointer in struct userfaultfd_wait_queue instead,
> which is kernel-internal and passed around anyway. The casts and the
> zeroing go away, at the (negligible) cost of 8 more bytes on the
> stack.
>
> No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tal Zussman <tz2294@columbia.edu>
Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
> ---
> mm/userfaultfd.c | 19 ++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-01 8:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-31 15:47 Tal Zussman
2026-10-31 20:13 ` Jose A. Perez de Azpillaga
2026-11-01 8:26 ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aub3o-i3h2OVcWM-@kernel.org \
--to=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=tz2294@columbia.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®