From: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>,
Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
David Dai <david.dai@linux.dev>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 sched_ext/for-7.4-fixes] sched_ext: Fix stale pick when the donor changes during dispatch
Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2026 07:55:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aubiSxuL4cEJbpU7@gpd4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261031162803.541236-1-tj@kernel.org>
Hi Tejun,
On Sat, Oct 31, 2026 at 06:28:03AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Dispatch takes rq->donor as @prev and can drop the rq lock. With proxy
> execution, @prev may not be the running task, and another CPU can reset the
> donor to rq->curr meanwhile, through proxy_needs_return() on a wakeup or
> sched_proxy_block_task() on a class or scheduler change. The wakeup case:
>
> 1. dispatch_one() drops the rq lock, e.g. to move a task from another CPU.
> 2. Another CPU wakes the donor, which proxy execution migrated to this CPU.
> proxy_needs_return() dequeues it and resets the donor to rq->curr, and
> the wakeup enqueues it, possibly on another CPU.
> 3. dispatch_one() sees @prev queued and returns SCX_DSP_PREV.
> 4. do_pick_task_scx() returns @prev, and this CPU runs a task that is queued
> on another rq.
>
> Under core scheduling, the core pick runs dispatch for the sibling rqs with
> each sibling's donor as @prev, and a sibling can switch @prev out while
> dispatch has the lock dropped.
>
> Whatever dispatch concluded, and whatever it does with @prev after the drop,
> is about a task the rq no longer owns, whether it keeps @prev running or
> hands it to ops.dispatch().
>
> rq_modified_above() catches the change only when rq->curr is in a class
> above ext, and the dl_server pick skips that check. dispatch_core_pick()
> retries after a lock drop, but by then dispatch has used @prev.
>
> Restart the pick when @prev is no longer the donor. dispatch_one() tests
> after each step that can drop the lock, and scx_dispatch_sched() decides per
> ops.dispatch() call whether to hand @prev over, which also covers a class or
> scheduler change across a drop.
>
> With proxy execution alone, the donor only ever changes to rq->curr during a
> pick, so the retried pick can't go stale again. Under core scheduling, the
> restart goes through the core pick, which already retries after any lock
> drop.
>
> 7a3a6bfbd62a ("sched: Rework prev_balance() to avoid stale prev references")
> closed the same window in prev_balance() by reading rq->donor instead of
> taking @prev. That doesn't work here, as dispatch never evaluated the new
> donor, which may not even be a sched_ext task.
>
> Verified with synthetic reproducers for both cases.
>
> v2: Also cover rq lock drops inside dispatch (sashiko).
>
> v3: Don't keep a stale @prev after ops.dispatch() (sashiko).
>
> v4: Also cover a sibling switching @prev out under core scheduling. Retitle.
>
> Fixes: 7b0888b7cc19 ("sched_ext: Implement core-sched support")
> Fixes: c6fe97c34a1a ("sched: Allow enabling proxy exec with sched_ext")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.12+
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
With the separate rq->dl_server issue to be addressed in a follow-up:
Reviewed-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
One thing about stable backports: ops.cpu_acquire()/cpu_release() are
still supported interfaces in older kernels such as 6.12, are we
considering them deprecated in general?
Thanks,
-Andrea
> ---
> kernel/sched/ext/ext.c | 10 ++++++++++
> kernel/sched/ext/inlines.h | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
> index cd923f9f1f2a..e533c1a5c56d 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
> @@ -3407,6 +3407,12 @@ static enum scx_dsp_verdict dispatch_one(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev
> rq->scx.cpu_released = false;
> }
>
> + /* the ecaps sync may have dropped the rq lock */
> + if (scx_dsp_prev_stale(rq, prev)) {
> + verdict = SCX_DSP_RETRY;
> + goto has_tasks;
> + }
> +
> if (prev->sched_class == &ext_sched_class) {
> update_curr_scx(rq);
>
> @@ -3449,6 +3455,10 @@ static enum scx_dsp_verdict dispatch_one(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev
> }
>
> verdict = scx_dispatch_sched(root_sch, rq, prev, false);
> +
> + /* scx_dispatch_sched() may have dropped the rq lock */
> + if (scx_dsp_prev_stale(rq, prev))
> + verdict = SCX_DSP_RETRY;
> if (verdict != SCX_DSP_NONE)
> goto has_tasks;
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext/inlines.h b/kernel/sched/ext/inlines.h
> index 1e39d12678c4..5dce394e0813 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/ext/inlines.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/ext/inlines.h
> @@ -18,9 +18,32 @@ enum scx_dsp_verdict {
> SCX_DSP_NONE, /* nothing to run */
> SCX_DSP_LOCAL, /* local DSQ has tasks */
> SCX_DSP_PREV, /* keep running @prev */
> - SCX_DSP_RETRY, /* pick helpers only: restart the pick */
> + SCX_DSP_RETRY, /* restart the pick */
> };
>
> +/**
> + * scx_dsp_prev_stale - Test whether dispatch's @prev went stale
> + * @rq: rq being dispatched for
> + * @prev: @rq's donor when dispatch started
> + *
> + * @prev can stop being @rq's donor while dispatch has the rq lock dropped. With
> + * proxy execution, @prev may not be the running task, and another CPU can reset
> + * the donor to rq->curr. With core scheduling, the core pick runs dispatch for
> + * the sibling rqs too, and a sibling can switch @prev out. Dispatch restarts
> + * the pick when that happened and doesn't hand the old donor to the BPF
> + * scheduler.
> + *
> + * With proxy execution alone, the donor only ever changes to rq->curr during a
> + * pick. Only __schedule() on this CPU sets a different donor, after the pick,
> + * so the restarted pick takes rq->curr as @prev and can't go stale again. Under
> + * core scheduling, the restart goes through the core pick, which already
> + * retries whenever dispatch dropped the lock.
> + */
> +static inline bool scx_dsp_prev_stale(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
> +{
> + return (sched_proxy_exec() || sched_core_enabled(rq)) && unlikely(prev != rq->donor);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * One user of this function is scx_bpf_sub_dispatch() which can be called
> * recursively as sub-sched dispatches nest. Always inline to reduce stack usage
> @@ -33,8 +56,7 @@ scx_dispatch_sched(struct scx_sched *sch, struct rq *rq,
> struct scx_dsp_ctx *dspc = &this_cpu_ptr(sch->pcpu)->dsp_ctx;
> int nr_loops = SCX_DSP_MAX_LOOPS;
> s32 cpu = cpu_of(rq);
> - bool prev_on_sch = (prev->sched_class == &ext_sched_class) &&
> - scx_task_on_sched(sch, prev);
> + bool prev_on_sch;
>
> if (scx_consume_global_dsq(sch, rq))
> return SCX_DSP_LOCAL;
> @@ -106,6 +128,11 @@ scx_dispatch_sched(struct scx_sched *sch, struct rq *rq,
> rq->scx.sub_dispatch_prev = prev;
> #endif
>
> + /* the dispatch so far may have dropped the rq lock */
> + prev_on_sch = !scx_dsp_prev_stale(rq, prev) &&
> + prev->sched_class == &ext_sched_class &&
> + scx_task_on_sched(sch, prev);
> +
> SCX_CALL_OP(sch, dispatch, rq, scx_cpu_arg(cpu),
> prev_on_sch ? prev : NULL);
>
> @@ -116,7 +143,9 @@ scx_dispatch_sched(struct scx_sched *sch, struct rq *rq,
>
> scx_flush_dispatch_buf(sch, rq);
>
> - if ((prev->scx.flags & SCX_TASK_QUEUED) && prev->scx.slice)
> + /* ops.dispatch() and the flush may have dropped the rq lock */
> + if (!scx_dsp_prev_stale(rq, prev) &&
> + (prev->scx.flags & SCX_TASK_QUEUED) && prev->scx.slice)
> return SCX_DSP_PREV;
> if (rq->scx.local_dsq.nr)
> return SCX_DSP_LOCAL;
> --
> 2.56.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-01 6:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-31 16:28 Tejun Heo
2026-11-01 6:55 ` Andrea Righi [this message]
2026-11-02 6:35 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aubiSxuL4cEJbpU7@gpd4 \
--to=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=david.dai@linux.dev \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®