From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: "Baek Kyu, Kim" <pocj8ur4in@gmail.com>
Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Bradley Morgan <brads@mainlining.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] taskstats: Avoid counting an exiting thread twice in TGID queries
Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2026 15:26:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <audMK54OZfUMGdqe@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261031052451.78846-1-pocj8ur4in@gmail.com>
On 10/31, Baek Kyu, Kim wrote:
>
> fill_tgid_exit() adds a thread's contribution to signal->stats before
> exit_notify() sets exit_state. A TGID query in that interval copies the
> cached contribution, then scans the same thread because exit_state is
> still clear. The thread's contribution is counted twice.
I forgot everything about this code, quite possibly I am wrong but let
me add some comments anyway...
Yes, known problem. Plus afaics fill_stats_for_tgid() can also miss an
exiting task, see below.
Another problem is that taskstats_exit(group_exit => true) can miss other
threads which have not called taskstats_exit() yet and report TGID/AGROUP.
Afaics this patch doesn't try to fix this.
> --- a/kernel/fork.c
> +++ b/kernel/fork.c
> @@ -2202,6 +2202,9 @@ __latent_entropy struct task_struct *copy_process(
> goto bad_fork_cleanup_count;
>
> delayacct_tsk_init(p); /* Must remain after dup_task_struct() */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_TASKSTATS
> + p->taskstats_tgid_accounted = false;
> +#endif
I agree with Bradley, this looks unnecessary.
> @@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ static int fill_stats_for_tgid(pid_t tgid, struct taskstats *stats)
>
> now_ns = ktime_get_ns();
> for_each_thread(first, tsk) {
> - if (tsk->exit_state)
> + if (tsk->exit_state || tsk->taskstats_tgid_accounted)
> continue;
If we add taskstats_tgid_accounted, why do we need to check exit_state?
In the multithreaded case, if taskstats_tgid_accounted is true, then
exit_state should be true too (ignoring the kmem_cache_zalloc() failures).
In the single threaded case this looks simply wrong. The exiting single
threaded task will not call fill_tgid_exit(). If cmd_attr_tgid() is called
after exit_notify(), it will miss that zombie.
And... Perhaps it would be better to use ->atomic_flags rather than add
yet another member to task_struct?
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-01 14:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-31 5:24 Baek Kyu, Kim
2026-10-31 15:23 ` Bradley Morgan
2026-11-01 14:26 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2026-11-01 14:53 ` Bradley Morgan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=audMK54OZfUMGdqe@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brads@mainlining.org \
--cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pocj8ur4in@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®