From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc: Cen Zhang <zzzccc427@gmail.com>,
dhowells@redhat.com, paul@paul-moore.com, jmorris@namei.org,
serge@hallyn.com, keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, baijiaju1990@gmail.com,
jjzuming@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] keys: Protect the update method check against type removalg
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2026 09:27:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aug7YvK_mhbm51JR@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aug072sNik47BXxQ@kernel.org>
On Mon, Nov 02, 2026 at 09:00:03AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 01, 2026 at 02:15:19PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 31, 2026 at 05:26:36PM +0800, Cen Zhang wrote:
> > > Take key->sem before the first access to key->type and hold it until
> > > the preparsed payload has been freed. Once a key exists, only the GC
> > > changes key->type, and it does so with key->sem held for writing.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
> >
> > But it seems broken that a key type can be removed while keys of that
> > type still exist.
>
> It might sense add ->owner and use try_module_get(). That would lead
> into removal of key_type_dead.
>
> I'd think that is doable but I would first consider applying
> https://lore.kernel.org/keyrings/20261030205412.3138975-1-jarkko@kernel.org/
> as that is more substantial multi-subsystem change.
I would probably favor this idea but it would also change visible
semantics how key types behave with rmmod.
I.e. -EBUSY instead of immediate success. I'm only worried here
of user space relaying on how it works right now.
Br, Jarkko
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-02 7:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-31 9:26 [PATCH v3] keys: Protect the update method check against type removal Cen Zhang
2026-10-31 9:50 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-11-01 22:15 ` Eric Biggers
2026-11-02 6:59 ` [PATCH v3] keys: Protect the update method check against type removalg Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-11-02 7:27 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aug7YvK_mhbm51JR@kernel.org \
--to=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=baijiaju1990@gmail.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=jjzuming@gmail.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=zzzccc427@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®