mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc: Cen Zhang <zzzccc427@gmail.com>,
	dhowells@redhat.com, paul@paul-moore.com, jmorris@namei.org,
	serge@hallyn.com, keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, baijiaju1990@gmail.com,
	jjzuming@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] keys: Protect the update method check against type removalg
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2026 09:27:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aug7YvK_mhbm51JR@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aug072sNik47BXxQ@kernel.org>

On Mon, Nov 02, 2026 at 09:00:03AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 01, 2026 at 02:15:19PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 31, 2026 at 05:26:36PM +0800, Cen Zhang wrote:
> > > Take key->sem before the first access to key->type and hold it until
> > > the preparsed payload has been freed. Once a key exists, only the GC
> > > changes key->type, and it does so with key->sem held for writing.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
> > 
> > But it seems broken that a key type can be removed while keys of that
> > type still exist.
> 
> It might sense add ->owner and use try_module_get(). That would lead
> into removal of key_type_dead.
> 
> I'd think that is doable but I would first consider applying
> https://lore.kernel.org/keyrings/20261030205412.3138975-1-jarkko@kernel.org/
> as that is more substantial multi-subsystem change.

I would probably favor this idea but it would also change visible
semantics how key types behave with rmmod.

I.e. -EBUSY instead of immediate success. I'm only worried here
of user space relaying on how it works right now.

Br, Jarkko

      reply	other threads:[~2026-11-02  7:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-31  9:26 [PATCH v3] keys: Protect the update method check against type removal Cen Zhang
2026-10-31  9:50 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-11-01 22:15 ` Eric Biggers
2026-11-02  6:59   ` [PATCH v3] keys: Protect the update method check against type removalg Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-11-02  7:27     ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aug7YvK_mhbm51JR@kernel.org \
    --to=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=baijiaju1990@gmail.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=jjzuming@gmail.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=zzzccc427@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®