mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
To: YuanZhe Liu <25031212351@stu.xidian.edu.cn>
Cc: sashiko-bot@kernel.org,
	Thangaraj Samynathan <Thangaraj.S@microchip.com>,
	UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, Bin Yu <byu@xidian.edu.cn>,
	Cheng Wen <wencheng@xidian.edu.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: usb: lan78xx: only stop phylink if the interface is running
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2026 11:05:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <auhgcS6p-HDFYd7x@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <179346555447.2831.9240931140716315096@stu.xidian.edu.cn>

Hi,

Thank you for your patch, i'm testing it right now on my HW.

On Sun, Nov 01, 2026 at 12:52:34AM +0800, YuanZhe Liu wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2026 at 04:02:36PM +0000, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> > Does calling phylink_stop() and phylink_disconnect_phy() before
> > unregister_netdev(net) in drivers/net/usb/lan78xx.c:lan78xx_disconnect()
> > cause out-of-order teardown, a duplicate phylink_stop() call, and a race
> > window when rtnl_lock() is dropped?
> 
> Yes, the ordering is wrong. v2 drops the explicit phylink_stop() from the
> disconnect path and unregisters the net device first:
> 
> 	unregister_netdev(net);
> 
> 	rtnl_lock();
> 	phylink_disconnect_phy(dev->phylink);
> 	rtnl_unlock();
> 
> unregister_netdev() closes a running device, so phylink_stop() is done by
> lan78xx_stop() with dev->dev_mutex held and after the TX/RX URBs have been
> terminated, which is the same sequence as a normal ifdown. When the
> interface was never started no phylink_stop() happens at all, and that is
> exactly the case phy_stop() complains about with "called from state READY".
> 
> This also removes the second phylink_stop() invocation and the window in
> which the net device was still registered with no PHY attached.
> 
> On the remaining points:
> 
> - The duplicate phylink_stop() was harmless in practice, because after
>   phylink_disconnect_phy() pl->phydev is NULL and PHYLINK_DISABLE_STOPPED
>   is already set. It is gone now anyway.
> 
> - The PHY interrupt is not released by phylink_disconnect_phy(). The virq
>   created by irq_create_mapping() is disposed in lan78xx_remove_irq_domain(),
>   called from lan78xx_unbind(), which also clears dev->domain_data.phyirq;
>   lan78xx_status() tests that field before generic_handle_irq_safe(). The
>   intr URB is killed later in lan78xx_disconnect(), and that ordering is
>   unchanged by this patch.

If I see it correctly, in the practices it is a dead code, please see:
30a41ed32d30 ("net: phy: microchip: force IRQ polling mode for lan88xx")

> - Andrew also asked why the Fixes tag points at e110bc825897: that commit
>   added both the phylink instance and the unconditional phylink_stop() call
>   in lan78xx_disconnect(), and
> 
>     git log -S'phylink_stop(dev->phylink)' -- drivers/net/usb/lan78xx.c
> 
>   shows that the line has not been touched since.

Re-testing it right now.

Do you have access to a real hw or you testing it on QEMU?

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-02 10:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-29 16:02 YuanZhe Liu
2026-10-30 17:38 ` YuanZhe Liu
2026-10-30 19:23   ` Andrew Lunn
2026-10-30 20:02 ` Andrew Lunn
     [not found] ` <sashiko-outbox-191206@kernel.org>
2026-10-31 16:52   ` YuanZhe Liu
2026-11-02 10:05     ` Oleksij Rempel [this message]
2026-11-02 11:29       ` YuanZhe Liu
2026-11-02 15:40 ` Oleksij Rempel
2026-11-02 16:42   ` [PATCH net] net: usb: lan78xx: only stop phylink if the network device " Yuanzhe Liu
2026-11-02 16:20 ` [PATCH net] net: usb: lan78xx: only stop phylink if the interface " netdev-bot+sashiko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=auhgcS6p-HDFYd7x@pengutronix.de \
    --to=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=25031212351@stu.xidian.edu.cn \
    --cc=Thangaraj.S@microchip.com \
    --cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=byu@xidian.edu.cn \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wencheng@xidian.edu.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®