From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.pizza>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] vsprintf: Don't leak pointers
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2026 15:10:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aunrc5atzlyf0TM9@pathway.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261023-vsprintf_kallsym-v5-0-57ff92187c1d@linutronix.de>
On Fri 2026-10-23 18:46:22, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> It is possible to leak pointers via %ps without KALLSYMS enabled.
> With KALLSYMS pointers can be leaked if they can not be resolved.
>
> The tiny series has two patches, one for each issue.
> I do follow the %p format instead of printing "(unknown)" since I care
> more about getting it out of the way than the actual content (as long as
> it is not the leaked pointer). Last time the discussion added the h:
> prefix to a hashed pointer to identify it as such. I would like to keep
> this part out of the series since there are few users that expect a
> certain pointer width and adding two extra characters would break that
> (we could strip the two 0 on 64bit but again, not related to this
> problem here).
>
> v4…v5: https://patch.msgid.link/20261019-vsprintf_kallsym-v4-0-ffd3c012d00c@linutronix.de
> - Use %p instead snprintf_default_pointer(). This might recurse back to
> vsnprintf() if used by '%ps' but it already did so. Suggested by Petr
> Mladek.
>
> v3…v4: https://patch.msgid.link/20261015-vsprintf_kallsym-v3-0-c175c27f38b7@linutronix.de
> - In symbol_string(), !CONFIG_KALLSYMS case, use the 'value' argument
> instead 'ptr' to consider the '%pR' case. Noticed by lkp@intel.com.
> - The kerneldoc for snprintf_default_pointer() must describe the 'len'
> argument instead the not existing 'size'. Noticed by lkp@intel.com.
> - sashiko noticed that the string isn't properly terminated if the
> input buffer is too small.
>
> v2…v3: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260821152614.2202196-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de/
> - Instead of "(unknown)" the hashed pointer is printed. This follows
> the generic %p flow.
> - In v2 I argued that it is better so print the actual pointer instead
> hiding it for post-mortem analysis. After looking at some backtraces
> with invalid pointers (not part of the kernel image) I realised the
> the PC is already part of the register dump. There I changed it back
> to what %p would do if it can't resolve a pointer. Again, following
> %p flow so it can be overridden at boot.
>
> v1…v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260814144854.746840-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de/
> - For %ps and !KALLSYMS no_hash_pointers is used to decide if the
> pointer should be written or not. This aligns with the %p policy.
> - For %ps and KALLSYMS, unresolved pointer continue to be leaked. It
> has been pointed out it might be useful to see them in backtraces/
> crashes if the return address became invalid.
>
> ---
> Sebastian Andrzej Siewior (2):
> vsprintf: Don't leak pointers for %ps without KALLSYMS enabled
> kallsyms: Don't leak pointers for unresolved symbols
>
> kernel/kallsyms.c | 2 +-
> lib/vsprintf.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
JFYI, the patchset has been committed into printk/linux.git,
branch for-7.5-vsprintf-kallsyms.
Best Regards,
Petr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-03 14:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-23 16:46 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-10-23 16:46 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] vsprintf: Don't leak pointers for %ps without KALLSYMS enabled Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-10-23 16:46 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] kallsyms: Don't leak pointers for unresolved symbols Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-10-24 2:13 ` kernel test robot
2026-10-24 10:07 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-10-24 16:10 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-10-25 14:51 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-10-27 16:00 ` Petr Mladek
2026-11-02 11:38 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-11-03 14:10 ` Petr Mladek [this message]
2026-11-03 15:45 ` [PATCH v5 0/2] vsprintf: Don't leak pointers Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aunrc5atzlyf0TM9@pathway.suse.cz \
--to=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=tycho@tycho.pizza \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®