From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: Umang Pokhriyal <umangpokhriyall@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
"Liam R . Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] selftests/mm: test a uffd write-protect range with an unregistered page
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2026 21:05:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <auowiuwkogQ0-g7V@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261102103621.156928-3-umangpokhriyall@gmail.com>
Hi Umang,
On Mon, Nov 02, 2026 at 04:06:21PM +0530, Umang Pokhriyal wrote:
> Register only the first of two pages and check that UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT
> over both pages fails with ENOENT without changing the first page, when
> protecting and when unprotecting.
I don't think it's worth keeping the test for a regression we already
fixed.
> Signed-off-by: Umang Pokhriyal <umangpokhriyall@gmail.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c
> index 298609544..57e442fd2 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c
> @@ -375,6 +375,56 @@ static void uffd_wp_unpopulated_test(uffd_global_test_opts_t *gopts, uffd_test_a
> uffd_test_pass();
> }
>
> +/*
> + * UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT over a range whose second page is not registered must
> + * fail without changing the first page, in both directions.
> + */
> +static void uffd_wp_partial_range_test(uffd_global_test_opts_t *gopts,
> + uffd_test_args_t *args)
> +{
> + struct uffdio_writeprotect prms = {
> + .range.start = (uint64_t)gopts->area_dst,
> + .range.len = 2 * gopts->page_size,
> + };
> + uint64_t value;
> + int pagemap_fd;
> +
> + /* Only the first page is registered; the second is a separate VMA */
> + if (uffd_register(gopts->uffd, gopts->area_dst, gopts->page_size,
> + false, true, false))
> + err("register failed");
> +
> + pagemap_fd = pagemap_open();
> + *gopts->area_dst = 1;
> +
> + prms.mode = UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT_MODE_WP;
> + if (!ioctl(gopts->uffd, UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT, &prms) || errno != ENOENT) {
> + uffd_test_fail("protect over an unregistered page did not fail with ENOENT");
> + goto out;
> + }
> + value = pagemap_get_entry(pagemap_fd, gopts->area_dst);
> + if (value & PM_UFFD_WP) {
> + uffd_test_fail("failed protect changed the first page");
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + wp_range(gopts->uffd, (uint64_t)gopts->area_dst, gopts->page_size, true);
> + prms.mode = 0;
> + if (!ioctl(gopts->uffd, UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT, &prms) || errno != ENOENT) {
> + uffd_test_fail("unprotect over an unregistered page did not fail with ENOENT");
> + goto out;
> + }
> + value = pagemap_get_entry(pagemap_fd, gopts->area_dst);
> + if (!(value & PM_UFFD_WP)) {
> + uffd_test_fail("failed unprotect changed the first page");
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + uffd_test_pass();
> +out:
> + close(pagemap_fd);
> +}
> +
> static void uffd_wp_fork_test_common(uffd_global_test_opts_t *gopts, uffd_test_args_t *args,
> bool with_event)
> {
> @@ -2403,6 +2453,12 @@ uffd_test_case_t uffd_tests[] = {
> .uffd_feature_required =
> UFFD_FEATURE_PAGEFAULT_FLAG_WP | UFFD_FEATURE_WP_UNPOPULATED,
> },
> + {
> + .name = "wp-partial-range",
> + .uffd_fn = uffd_wp_partial_range_test,
> + .mem_targets = MEM_ANON,
> + .uffd_feature_required = UFFD_FEATURE_PAGEFAULT_FLAG_WP,
> + },
> {
> .name = "minor",
> .uffd_fn = uffd_minor_test,
> --
> 2.53.0
>
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-03 19:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-02 10:36 [PATCH 0/2] userfaultfd: validate the whole range before changing write protection Umang Pokhriyal
2026-11-02 10:36 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Umang Pokhriyal
2026-11-03 18:54 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-11-02 10:36 ` [PATCH 2/2] selftests/mm: test a uffd write-protect range with an unregistered page Umang Pokhriyal
2026-11-03 19:05 ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=auowiuwkogQ0-g7V@kernel.org \
--to=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=umangpokhriyall@gmail.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®