From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: Avi Weiss <thnkslprpt@gmail.com>
Cc: anna-maria@linutronix.de, tglx@kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hrtimer: Refresh softirq deadline after clock changes in low-res mode
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2026 17:51:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <autinnoNb1wz3MPk@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261101172344.426489-1-thnkslprpt@gmail.com>
Le Sun, Nov 01, 2026 at 07:23:44PM +0200, Avi Weiss a écrit :
> In periodic low-resolution mode, hrtimer_run_queues() updates the clock
> base offsets at each tick but does not refresh softirq_expires_next.
> When CLOCK_REALTIME is moved forward, an expired soft hrtimer can
> therefore remain pending until the old monotonic deadline is reached.
>
> Reevaluate the next expiry when hrtimer_update_base() observes a new
> clock-was-set sequence, before checking whether to raise HRTIMER_SOFTIRQ.
>
> Fixes: 5da70160462e ("hrtimer: Implement support for softirq based hrtimers")
> Signed-off-by: Avi Weiss <thnkslprpt@gmail.com>
> ---
> kernel/time/hrtimer.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
> index 17dd38a6cee7..5d1df371e931 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
> @@ -2289,6 +2289,7 @@ void hrtimer_run_queues(void)
> struct hrtimer_cpu_base *cpu_base = this_cpu_ptr(&hrtimer_bases);
> unsigned long flags;
> ktime_t now;
> + unsigned int seq;
>
> if (hrtimer_hres_active(cpu_base))
> return;
> @@ -2306,7 +2307,10 @@ void hrtimer_run_queues(void)
> }
>
> raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cpu_base->lock, flags);
> + seq = cpu_base->clock_was_set_seq;
> now = hrtimer_update_base(cpu_base);
> + if (seq != cpu_base->clock_was_set_seq)
> + hrtimer_update_next_event(cpu_base);
It took some time for me to understand the issue because retrigger_next_event()
takes care of that already.
But if the clock is set and hrtimer_run_queues() happens to run before the base
is locked and update_needs_ipi() is called, the IPI won't happen.
It could be worth adding that to the changelog.
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
--
Frederic Weisbecker
SUSE Labs
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-04 16:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-01 17:23 Avi Weiss
2026-11-04 16:51 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=autinnoNb1wz3MPk@localhost.localdomain \
--to=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=thnkslprpt@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®