mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: Avi Weiss <thnkslprpt@gmail.com>
Cc: anna-maria@linutronix.de, tglx@kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hrtimer: Refresh softirq deadline after clock changes in low-res mode
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2026 17:51:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <autinnoNb1wz3MPk@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261101172344.426489-1-thnkslprpt@gmail.com>

Le Sun, Nov 01, 2026 at 07:23:44PM +0200, Avi Weiss a écrit :
> In periodic low-resolution mode, hrtimer_run_queues() updates the clock
> base offsets at each tick but does not refresh softirq_expires_next.
> When CLOCK_REALTIME is moved forward, an expired soft hrtimer can
> therefore remain pending until the old monotonic deadline is reached.
> 
> Reevaluate the next expiry when hrtimer_update_base() observes a new
> clock-was-set sequence, before checking whether to raise HRTIMER_SOFTIRQ.
> 
> Fixes: 5da70160462e ("hrtimer: Implement support for softirq based hrtimers")
> Signed-off-by: Avi Weiss <thnkslprpt@gmail.com>
> ---
>  kernel/time/hrtimer.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
> index 17dd38a6cee7..5d1df371e931 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
> @@ -2289,6 +2289,7 @@ void hrtimer_run_queues(void)
>  	struct hrtimer_cpu_base *cpu_base = this_cpu_ptr(&hrtimer_bases);
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  	ktime_t now;
> +	unsigned int seq;
>  
>  	if (hrtimer_hres_active(cpu_base))
>  		return;
> @@ -2306,7 +2307,10 @@ void hrtimer_run_queues(void)
>  	}
>  
>  	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cpu_base->lock, flags);
> +	seq = cpu_base->clock_was_set_seq;
>  	now = hrtimer_update_base(cpu_base);
> +	if (seq != cpu_base->clock_was_set_seq)
> +		hrtimer_update_next_event(cpu_base);

It took some time for me to understand the issue because retrigger_next_event()
takes care of that already.

But if the clock is set and hrtimer_run_queues() happens to run before the base
is locked and update_needs_ipi() is called, the IPI won't happen.

It could be worth adding that to the changelog.

Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>

-- 
Frederic Weisbecker
SUSE Labs

      reply	other threads:[~2026-11-04 16:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-01 17:23 Avi Weiss
2026-11-04 16:51 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=autinnoNb1wz3MPk@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=thnkslprpt@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®