From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=194.117.254.33 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1793868626; b=OaQNo98dg5sqhJhNQCJhSreyUxlqNV/IseLrw/VHxQoXEwI0ee5+9NgzRti1ZHuaZy3U GUjpWlXYH3SgB7RdLG9IAuHWa5X4xIZi0VjiwVJOOEopZIrtubEr+5Z+CuYvy+FRsfB+w FoP4DgMeX1IGKQcU1UeWbqcBPBOj2rRt7vkmtFyNKb/AOAoQzmyNDPTjx/cqIc6VtAujR 5FhYSDoyxVamgvHLrZ58viEuap4v4n6t+QF1sHOjF3qHg46czd6lzXcSsXH4U8WBUS4oV TG7MO6cnsysm4J7D/1gcN8nrSILjcu9hA6cfaT1pGPi/ahA6HwSWI7BYwDbmKsnQDFg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1793868626; h=DMARC-Filter:DKIM-Signature:Received:Received:X-UD-Smtp-Session:Date: From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; bh=i09FKaWoTqtKsFXZIJxb/id6UZzTo17qjziWu87IOTI=; b=E32ysiQ6vid7jrFcq75q2jw6X0HGtzH7DVpy5U31jgbA4D6yq7e+wyqthXt7nindgFHI Z3k9DZ6yqUn0Wt9n+Q4c/ZrNz3Pwh1HfwXDTxNBpyXqatGkgxGs4+OJ9G1BeOdysaNN9E hAHK9nvxQT0/ce5PBohk8+C0/mBHE7wbiP7Auy/y6PD1W1j5MELFwp8Qv2OF/Pvy1cRNC OX31C+HW0mYpB4RUarexcC05N8Eomlr1tJbM03K8oz1MgOEzwUkPwMVhDQlYA1XQT4Agm ZQCopVbc5KxEQzdQE3FVmcv7OjTCR8BMBl3yiLJBqTKBaWm4tz1ahVp8cX7aPvleXjQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none header.from=sang-engineering.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com; dkim=pass header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k1 header.b=BSuAcfX0; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=194.117.254.33 Received: from mail.zeus03.de (zeus03.de [194.117.254.33]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE138606A326 for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2026 08:50:24 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp.subspace.kernel.org AE138606A326 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k1 header.b=BSuAcfX0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= sang-engineering.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=k1; bh=i09F KaWoTqtKsFXZIJxb/id6UZzTo17qjziWu87IOTI=; b=BSuAcfX0CNLkKQs4idDV 9bc6Kj4bL1r9/LHXlpPoDPeFZRhlnv2TmWBsLltrIY4fhrJw6xfyRPKNSk54SBT/ FJnSasVB+LNWDxWJ8C+1M4Fa4NdaedAuWTQyCNKBmiVQGc2nvJgiG9RAdEHlDPBD ydR8t1n8vrVv7yLuYqcp+07XmspQO2ADP2suN5qxp6tfAh/Y3FtLygWuYij+Oy23 0B+b7rGJndz8IxmkfUPVZPsuXy9qV7rFdwkV9Flc3mFbUWKS31d3bN/++InbHBqX 7cYcp9TDygZCKByg2LDy3aFlEtJkWz4/+SXMuvZxIYGGLdSCILFATg35IEkYTIjQ jA== Received: (qmail 1073366 invoked from network); 5 Nov 2026 09:50:22 +0100 Received: by mail.zeus03.de with ESMTPSA (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted, authenticated); 5 Nov 2026 09:50:22 +0100 X-UD-Smtp-Session: l3s3148p1@O3b4lYNfeq/AwtcC Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2026 10:50:21 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: Jonathan Corbet , Shuah Khan , Randy Dunlap , workflows@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Shevchenko Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] docs: submitting-patches: Clarify half-baked review tags Message-ID: References: <20261105082729.19622-2-krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com> X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20261105082729.19622-2-krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com> > +If the reviewer checks only a piece of the patch, leaving the rest unreviewed, > +then more appropriate is Acked-by tag or adding a "# subpart-name" marker "... is an Acked-by ..."? > +after the Reviewed-by tag: > + > + Reviewed-by: I Did Not Read Everything # bar, baz How about being more specific? + Reviewed-by: Driver X author # for Driver X TBH, I think the above is even better than a generic "Acked-by" which is basically "Yeah, I didn't look in detail but the general approach looks fine". Which is not what the above says. The above says: "I didn't check the general approach, but assuming it is okay, the changes to my driver are correct". If I get a couple of those, then I know which parts have been reviewed and which have not. A list of generic Acked-bys will not provide that information. So, actually, I think even the Acked-by should have the "# subpart name" once only a part of the patch has been looked at. Ack/Rev is then describing the thoroughness of that look. Do you get what I mean?