From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
To: Jia Jia <physicalmtea@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, stefanha@redhat.com,
bobbyeshleman@gmail.com, mst@redhat.com, jasowangio@gmail.com,
eperezma@redhat.com, xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 1/5] vsock/virtio: split socket lookup from locked RX processing
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2026 10:04:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <auxGc7T-7vCsGWlE@sgarzare-redhat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261103041134.33310-2-physicalmtea@gmail.com>
On Tue, Nov 03, 2026 at 12:11:30PM +0800, Jia Jia wrote:
>Split virtio_transport_recv_pkt() so socket lookup is separate from
>processing that occurs while holding the socket lock. This prepares the
>receive path to retain a looked-up socket across multiple packets in a
>later change.
>
>Keep virtio_transport_recv_pkt() on its existing per-packet locking path.
>Pass the caller-provided network namespace to the locked helper so reset
>handling retains its existing semantics. Preserve source validation and
>failure handling.
>
>Signed-off-by: Jia Jia <physicalmtea@gmail.com>
>---
> net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 131 ++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 78 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>index f225f53ed4bab..43325d7aebbb1 100644
>--- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>@@ -1774,6 +1774,80 @@ static bool virtio_transport_valid_type(u16 type)
> (type == VIRTIO_VSOCK_TYPE_SEQPACKET);
> }
>
>+static struct sock *
>+virtio_transport_find_socket(struct sockaddr_vm *src,
>+ struct sockaddr_vm *dst, struct net *net)
>+{
>+ struct sock *sk;
>+
>+ sk = vsock_find_connected_socket_net(src, dst, net);
>+ if (!sk)
>+ sk = vsock_find_bound_socket_net(dst, net);
>+
>+ return sk;
>+}
>+
>+/*
>+ * The caller holds sk's socket lock.
>+ */
>+static void
>+virtio_transport_recv_pkt_locked(struct virtio_transport *t,
>+ struct sk_buff *skb, struct sock *sk,
>+ struct net *net)
>+{
>+ struct virtio_vsock_hdr *hdr = virtio_vsock_hdr(skb);
>+ struct vsock_sock *vsk = vsock_sk(sk);
>+ struct sockaddr_vm src;
>+ bool space_available;
>+
>+ vsock_addr_init(&src, le64_to_cpu(hdr->src_cid),
>+ le32_to_cpu(hdr->src_port));
>+
>+ /*
>+ * The socket may have been closed or reassigned after lookup but before
>+ * its socket lock was acquired. Listener sockets have no assigned
>+ * transport.
>+ */
>+ if (sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DONE) ||
>+ (sk->sk_state != TCP_LISTEN &&
>+ !vsock_check_source(vsk, &t->transport, &src))) {
>+ (void)virtio_transport_reset_no_sock(t, skb, net);
>+ kfree_skb(skb);
>+ return;
>+ }
>+
>+ space_available = virtio_transport_space_update(sk, skb);
>+
>+ /* Update CID in case it has changed after a transport reset event */
>+ if (vsk->local_addr.svm_cid != VMADDR_CID_ANY)
>+ vsk->local_addr.svm_cid = le64_to_cpu(hdr->dst_cid);
>+
>+ if (space_available)
>+ sk->sk_write_space(sk);
>+
>+ switch (sk->sk_state) {
>+ case TCP_LISTEN:
>+ virtio_transport_recv_listen(sk, skb, t);
>+ kfree_skb(skb);
>+ break;
>+ case TCP_SYN_SENT:
>+ virtio_transport_recv_connecting(sk, skb);
>+ kfree_skb(skb);
>+ break;
>+ case TCP_ESTABLISHED:
>+ virtio_transport_recv_connected(sk, skb);
>+ break;
>+ case TCP_CLOSING:
>+ virtio_transport_recv_disconnecting(sk, skb);
>+ kfree_skb(skb);
>+ break;
>+ default:
>+ (void)virtio_transport_reset_no_sock(t, skb, net);
>+ kfree_skb(skb);
>+ break;
>+ }
>+}
>+
> /* We are under the virtio-vsock's vsock->rx_lock or vhost-vsock's vq->mutex
> * lock.
> */
>@@ -1782,9 +1856,7 @@ void virtio_transport_recv_pkt(struct virtio_transport *t,
> {
> struct virtio_vsock_hdr *hdr = virtio_vsock_hdr(skb);
> struct sockaddr_vm src, dst;
>- struct vsock_sock *vsk;
> struct sock *sk;
>- bool space_available;
>
> vsock_addr_init(&src, le64_to_cpu(hdr->src_cid),
> le32_to_cpu(hdr->src_port));
>@@ -1808,13 +1880,10 @@ void virtio_transport_recv_pkt(struct virtio_transport *t,
> /* The socket must be in connected or bound table
> * otherwise send reset back
> */
>- sk = vsock_find_connected_socket_net(&src, &dst, net);
>+ sk = virtio_transport_find_socket(&src, &dst, net);
> if (!sk) {
>- sk = vsock_find_bound_socket_net(&dst, net);
>- if (!sk) {
>- (void)virtio_transport_reset_no_sock(t, skb, net);
>- goto free_pkt;
>- }
>+ (void)virtio_transport_reset_no_sock(t, skb, net);
>+ goto free_pkt;
> }
>
> if (virtio_transport_get_type(sk) != le16_to_cpu(hdr->type)) {
>@@ -1828,52 +1897,8 @@ void virtio_transport_recv_pkt(struct virtio_transport *t,
> goto free_pkt;
> }
>
>- vsk = vsock_sk(sk);
>-
> lock_sock(sk);
>-
>- /* Check if sk has been closed or assigned to another transport before
>- * lock_sock (note: listener sockets are not assigned to any transport)
>- */
>- if (sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DONE) ||
>- (sk->sk_state != TCP_LISTEN &&
>- !vsock_check_source(vsk, &t->transport, &src))) {
>- (void)virtio_transport_reset_no_sock(t, skb, net);
>- release_sock(sk);
>- sock_put(sk);
>- goto free_pkt;
>- }
>-
>- space_available = virtio_transport_space_update(sk, skb);
>-
>- /* Update CID in case it has changed after a transport reset event */
>- if (vsk->local_addr.svm_cid != VMADDR_CID_ANY)
>- vsk->local_addr.svm_cid = dst.svm_cid;
>-
>- if (space_available)
>- sk->sk_write_space(sk);
>-
>- switch (sk->sk_state) {
>- case TCP_LISTEN:
>- virtio_transport_recv_listen(sk, skb, t);
>- kfree_skb(skb);
>- break;
>- case TCP_SYN_SENT:
>- virtio_transport_recv_connecting(sk, skb);
>- kfree_skb(skb);
>- break;
>- case TCP_ESTABLISHED:
>- virtio_transport_recv_connected(sk, skb);
>- break;
>- case TCP_CLOSING:
>- virtio_transport_recv_disconnecting(sk, skb);
>- kfree_skb(skb);
>- break;
>- default:
>- (void)virtio_transport_reset_no_sock(t, skb, net);
>- kfree_skb(skb);
>- break;
>- }
>+ virtio_transport_recv_pkt_locked(t, skb, sk, net);
>
nit: if you need to resend, please remove this blank line or add a blank
line after lock_sock().
The rest LGTM:
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
> release_sock(sk);
>
>--
>2.53.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-05 9:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-03 4:11 [PATCH net-next v5 0/5] vsock/virtio: reduce RX per-packet socket overhead Jia Jia
2026-11-03 4:11 ` [PATCH net-next v5 1/5] vsock/virtio: split socket lookup from locked RX processing Jia Jia
2026-11-05 9:04 ` Stefano Garzarella [this message]
2026-11-03 4:11 ` [PATCH net-next v5 2/5] vsock/virtio: factor RX skb metadata budget check Jia Jia
2026-11-05 9:06 ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-11-06 12:28 ` Jia Jia
2026-11-03 4:11 ` [PATCH net-next v5 3/5] vsock/virtio: amortize RX socket locking for stream packets Jia Jia
2026-11-04 19:26 ` Bobby Eshleman
2026-11-05 8:16 ` Jia Jia
2026-11-05 8:57 ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-11-06 12:27 ` Jia Jia
2026-11-03 4:11 ` [PATCH net-next v5 4/5] vsock/virtio: coalesce native RX write-space notifications Jia Jia
2026-11-05 9:21 ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-11-06 12:49 ` Jia Jia
2026-11-03 4:11 ` [PATCH net-next v5 5/5] vsock/virtio: defer native RX readiness notifications until batch unlock Jia Jia
2026-11-05 9:38 ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-11-06 13:33 ` Jia Jia
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-10-23 7:51 [PATCH net-next v5 0/5] vsock/virtio: reduce RX per-packet socket overhead Jia Jia
2026-10-23 7:51 ` [PATCH net-next v5 1/5] vsock/virtio: split socket lookup from locked RX processing Jia Jia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=auxGc7T-7vCsGWlE@sgarzare-redhat \
--to=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=bobbyeshleman@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jasowangio@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=physicalmtea@gmail.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®