Hello Lee, On Thu, Nov 05, 2026 at 02:38:03PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > tegra_pwm_apply() passes the 64-bit state->duty_cycle and state->period > values into tegra_pwm_config(), which accepts signed 32-bit int > parameters and performs DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(c, period_ns) before > validating period_ns against pc->min_period_ns. If a consumer requests > a period that is a non-zero multiple of 2^32 nanoseconds, period_ns > truncates to zero and triggers a divide-by-zero panic. > > Widen duty_ns and period_ns to u64 and validate that period_ns lies > within [pc->min_period_ns, U32_MAX] prior to dividing by period_ns. > > Fixes: 1d7796bdb63a ("pwm: tegra: Support dynamic clock frequency configuration") > Fixes: fd3ddd4355c0 ("pwm: tegra: Implement .apply() callback") > Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/bug/linux-5c5b97d6-4da6-4d06-9dc7-957419dcd832 > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones This is already addressed in 9ad5602d4943 ("pwm: tegra: Fix value discarding for duty and period") which is next-20261102 and later. Best regards Uwe