From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: Guixiong Wei <weiguixiong@bytedance.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
keyrings@vger.kernel.org, Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
"Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KEYS: do not let an unmatched key decide the search result
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2026 03:17:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <avEfJT6hg-SCr7SN@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <451788d5e97cba38274e663d2b7952c593e959be.f77cb812.a801.42ef.9775.d2480a239fa8@bytedance.com>
On Mon, Nov 09, 2026 at 09:10:08AM +0800, Guixiong Wei wrote:
>
> > From: "Jarkko Sakkinen"<jarkko@kernel.org>
> > Date: Mon, Nov 9, 2026, 03:01
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] KEYS: do not let an unmatched key decide the search result
> > To: "Guixiong Wei"<weiguixiong@bytedance.com>
> > Cc: "David Howells"<dhowells@redhat.com>, <keyrings@vger.kernel.org>, "Paul Moore"<paul@paul-moore.com>, "James Morris"<jmorris@namei.org>, "Serge E . Hallyn"<serge@hallyn.com>, <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
> > On Sun, Nov 08, 2026 at 09:14:12PM +0800, Guixiong Wei wrote:
> > > KEYCTL_SEARCH returns -ENOKEY, -EKEYREVOKED, or -EKEYEXPIRED for the key
> > > selected by type and description. keyring_search_iterator() currently
> > > records revoked or expired state before asking the key type whether the key
> > > matches.
> >
> > I don't understand the "asking the key type or" part here. Please,
> > explain what you mean.
> >
> I meant calling ctx->match_data.cmp() to check whether a candidate key
> matches the search request. For dns_resolver, this calls
> dns_resolver_cmp() to compare the candidate's description with the
> requested name. I'll make that explicit in v2.
>
> > >
> > > Direct lookup visits the indexed description, so that ordering normally
> >
> > "Direct lookup visits the indexed description"
> >
> > I don't honestly understand this type of jargon, which is all over the
> > place.
> >
> I meant that assoc_array_find() looks up a candidate using the requested
> type and description. The dns_resolver search instead walks the keys and
> checks their descriptions using dns_resolver_cmp().
> I'll rewrite the commit message around your foo/bar example.
>
> > > does not matter. Iterative lookup visits every key of the requested type,
> > > however. The in-tree asymmetric id/ex/dn lookups and dns_resolver use this
> > > mode. A revoked key with a different description can therefore make
> > > KEYCTL_SEARCH return -EKEYREVOKED instead of continuing the search. It can
> > > also prevent request_key_and_link() from issuing an upcall because that
> > > path only upcalls after -EAGAIN. An unmatched expired key similarly
> > > pollutes searches that do not set KEYRING_SEARCH_SKIP_EXPIRED; the request
> > > path itself sets that flag.
> > >
> > > Run the type comparator before recording state errors, so only a key that
> > > matches the caller's criterion can decide the search result.
> >
> >
> > Can you describe instead describe the what goes wrong with an example,
> > which does not require much effort:
> >
> > keyctl new_session >/dev/null
> > A=$(printf '127.0.0.1\0' | keyctl padd dns_resolver foo @s)
> > keyctl revoke "$A"
> > keyctl search @s dns_resolver bar
> >
> > Results:
> >
> > keyctl_search: Key has been revoked
> >
> Thanks for the reproducer. The expected result is -ENOKEY because "bar"
> is absent.
>
> When the search encounters "foo", keyring_search_iterator() sets
> ctx->result to -EKEYREVOKED and skips that candidate before calling
> dns_resolver_cmp(). It therefore never checks whether "foo" matches
> "bar".
>
> The walk continues, but in this example it finishes with ctx->result
> still set to -EKEYREVOKED. My wording "instead of continuing the search"
> was inaccurate.
>
> The patch moves the match check before the state checks, so "foo" is
> skipped without changing ctx->result.
>
> > This example alone is not of course enough because it is lacking
> > explanation what goes wrong, which is neither clearly described by
> > the commit message but you could add my reported-by because at
> > least I constructe a real bug report that justifies this fix.
> Thanks, I will add your Reported-by.
Yeah, just sorting things out in proper order :-) Do those changes for
v2 and this should be good to go.
Br, Jarkko
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-09 1:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-08 13:14 Guixiong Wei
2026-11-08 19:01 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-11-09 1:10 ` Guixiong Wei
2026-11-09 1:17 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=avEfJT6hg-SCr7SN@kernel.org \
--to=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=weiguixiong@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®