From: Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>
To: "Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta)" <kas@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, Chris Mason <mason@kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/memory: recheck PG_uptodate after ->page_mkwrite()
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2026 14:11:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <avHULH5Irb3byJkG@pedro-suse.tail5790ac.ts.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261109120403.82361-2-kas@kernel.org>
On Mon, Nov 09, 2026 at 12:04:01PM +0000, Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta) wrote:
> do_shared_fault() unlocks the folio around ->page_mkwrite(). Writeback
> can lock it in that window, fail, and clear PG_uptodate with the folio
> left in the page cache. ecryptfs_writepages() does this when encryption
> fails. filemap_page_mkwrite() relocks the folio and checks only
> ->mapping, so the fault maps a folio that is not uptodate:
>
> CPU0 CPU1
> do_shared_fault()
> folio_unlock()
> ecryptfs_writepages()
> folio_clear_uptodate()
> filemap_page_mkwrite()
> folio_lock()
> finish_fault()
>
> The next read(2) or fault on the folio reads it in again from the file,
> over anything stored through the mapping in the meantime. Those stores
> are lost.
>
> Recheck PG_uptodate once ->page_mkwrite() returns with the folio locked,
> and retry the fault if it is clear, the same way filemap_fault() retries
> on a cached folio that lost PG_uptodate. Skip folios outside the page
> cache: driver pages from ->fault() never get PG_uptodate and would
> retry forever.
>
> The check stays out of do_page_mkwrite(): wp_page_shared() calls it on
> a folio that is still mapped, and a retry there would fault on the same
> PTE forever.
>
> Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/sashiko-outbox-202966@kernel.org/
> Signed-off-by: Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta) <kas@kernel.org>
> ---
> mm/memory.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index fe72e66c9c2e..cc1d0b7d15c7 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -5613,6 +5613,18 @@ static vm_fault_t do_anonymous_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> return VM_FAULT_OOM;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * A page cache folio that is not uptodate holds data that was never read in
> + * or cleared, and mapping it leaks stale memory to userspace.
> + */
> +static bool file_folio_not_uptodate(struct folio *folio)
> +{
> + if (likely(folio_test_uptodate(folio)))
> + return false;
> + /* Driver pages from ->fault() never get PG_uptodate */
> + return !folio_test_anon(folio) && folio->mapping;
FYI you can wrap this line in an unlikely() and it has the same effect as
wrapping every call:
return unlikely(!folio_test_anon(folio) && folio->mapping);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Either the VMA lock or the mmap_lock must have been held on entry
> * (see FAULT_FLAG_VMA_LOCK) and may have been released depending on
> @@ -6163,6 +6175,16 @@ static vm_fault_t do_shared_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> folio_put(folio);
> return tmp;
> }
> +
> + /*
> + * The folio was unlocked for ->page_mkwrite(). If it lost
> + * PG_uptodate meanwhile, retry the fault to read it in again.
> + */
The "read it in again" sounds a bit too prescriptive but, apart from that:
Reviewed-by: Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>
Thanks!
--
Pedro
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-09 14:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-09 12:04 [PATCH v2 0/2] mm/memory: refuse to map page cache folios that are not uptodate Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta)
2026-11-09 12:04 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/memory: recheck PG_uptodate after ->page_mkwrite() Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta)
2026-11-09 14:11 ` Pedro Falcato [this message]
2026-11-09 14:40 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-11-09 12:04 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mm/memory: refuse to map page cache folios that are not uptodate Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta)
2026-11-09 14:13 ` Pedro Falcato
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=avHULH5Irb3byJkG@pedro-suse.tail5790ac.ts.net \
--to=pfalcato@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mason@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®