From: Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@kernel.org>
To: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
Nico Pache <nico.pache@linux.dev>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>, Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>,
Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>,
Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>,
Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>,
Brendan Jackman <brendan.jackman@linux.dev>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Ye Liu <ye.liu@linux.dev>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/huge_memory: prevent losing PG_waiters in __split_folio_to_order()
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2026 15:26:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <avHktSBkWvQSakji@thinkstation> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261106-fix-split_folio_to_order-race-v2-1-1b59c67b8af3@nvidia.com>
On Fri, Nov 06, 2026 at 01:28:46PM -0500, Zi Yan wrote:
> __split_folio_to_order() calls prep_compound_page() on each new head page
> to create a compound page after clear_compound_head(). prep_compound_page()
> uses non atomic __SetPageHead(). It is mostly OK, since the folio is locked
> and frozen and no one else is supposed to modify the folio's flags.
>
> However, code calling migration_entry_wait() can reach the folio by PFN,
> then access its flags. It is because softleaf_entry_wait_on_locked() used
> by migration_entry_wait() sets PG_waiters concurrently without taking a
> reference and the frozen refcount during split cannot block it. Meanwhile,
> __SetPageHead() does a plain read and write, so PG_waiters atomically set
> by softleaf_entry_wait_on_locked() will be lost if the set happens after
> __SetPageHead()'s read and before its write.
>
> One example code interleaving:
>
> CPU0: __split_folio_to_order(new_order>0) CPU1: do_swap_page()
>
> 1. clear_compound_head(new_head)
> new_head->compound_info = 0
> (page_folio(new_head) == new_head now)
>
> 2. migration_entry_wait()
> softleaf_to_folio(entry)
> page_folio() -> new_head
> (not the old head any more)
>
> 3. prep_compound_page(new_head, new_order)
> __SetPageHead(new_head)
> tmp = new_head->flags.f <-- load; PG_waiters == 0 in tmp
>
> 4. folio_set_waiters(new_head)
> set_bit(PG_waiters, &flags.f)
> enqueue on waitqueue, sleep
>
> 5. new_head->flags.f = tmp | (1UL << PG_head)
> <-- store; overwrites step 4, PG_waiters == 0 again
>
> Later, folio_unlock(new_folio) sees no PG_waiters, skips folio_wake_bit(),
> and CPU1 can remain blocked indefinitely.
>
> Fix it by adding the atomic version SetPageHead() and
> prep_compound_page_atomic() using it. __split_folio_to_order() uses
> prep_compound_page_atomic() to avoid the issue without adding an atomic ops
> to other prep_compound_page() users.
>
> Reported-by: David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/DMHE8BEEER1H.2BIY52NXATPIA@nvidia.com/
> Fixes: c010d47f107f6 ("mm: thp: split huge page to any lower order pages")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Acked-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) <ljs@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
> ---
> The issue was raised by David when reviewing Ye Liu's "mm/huge_memory: use
> READ_ONCE() when cloning folio flags during split" [1].
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261029-data_race_huge_mem-v1-1-112e331291c1@linux.dev/
Sorry for late reply, I only now got to this.
Setting PG_head atomically on its own looks odd to me. The comment above
smp_wmb() already says page flags must be visible before the page becomes
non-compound. prep_compound_page() writing PG_head after
clear_compound_head() is what breaks that.
Can we build the whole flags word for the new head, PG_head included, and
store it once before smp_wmb()?
After clear_compound_head() only the tail and head setup is left, and it
does not touch new_head->flags. Then SetPageHead() and
prep_compound_page_atomic() are not needed.
This was option 2 in your analysis[*] on Ye Liu's READ_ONCE() thread,
but I don't see a barrier problem.
PG_head gets the same ordering as the cloned PG_locked, and
softleaf_entry_wait_on_locked() already relies on that through the same
smp_wmb() and page_folio(). The new head carries PG_head for a moment
while it is still a tail, but page_folio() only looks at compound_info.
Reading the old head's flags with READ_ONCE() while building the word
would also cover Ye Liu's KCSAN report.
Something like this, on top of the v2 base, compile-tested only:
[*] https://lore.kernel.org/all/DMHE8BEEER1H.2BIY52NXATPIA@nvidia.com
diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
index bd44d58e8684..53786b2abe89 100644
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -3714,6 +3714,7 @@ static void __split_folio_to_order(struct folio *folio, int old_order,
* Don't pass it around before clear_compound_head().
*/
struct folio *new_folio = (struct folio *)new_head;
+ unsigned long flags;
VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(atomic_read(&new_folio->_mapcount) != -1, new_head);
@@ -3730,8 +3731,8 @@ static void __split_folio_to_order(struct folio *folio, int old_order,
* unreferenced sub-pages of an anonymous THP: we can simply drop
* PG_anon_exclusive (-> PG_mappedtodisk) for these here.
*/
- new_folio->flags.f &= ~PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_PREP;
- new_folio->flags.f |= (folio->flags.f &
+ flags = READ_ONCE(new_folio->flags.f) & ~PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_PREP;
+ flags |= READ_ONCE(folio->flags.f) &
((1L << PG_referenced) |
(1L << PG_swapbacked) |
(1L << PG_swapcache) |
@@ -3749,7 +3750,16 @@ static void __split_folio_to_order(struct folio *folio, int old_order,
#endif
(1L << PG_dirty) |
(1L << PG_dropbehind) |
- LRU_GEN_MASK | LRU_REFS_MASK));
+ LRU_GEN_MASK | LRU_REFS_MASK);
+
+ /*
+ * Set PG_head here, not after clear_compound_head(): from then on
+ * softleaf_entry_wait_on_locked() can set PG_waiters on new_head
+ * without a reference, and a plain write would lose it.
+ */
+ if (new_order)
+ flags |= 1L << PG_head;
+ WRITE_ONCE(new_folio->flags.f, flags);
new_folio->mapping = folio->mapping;
new_folio->index = folio->index + i;
@@ -3779,7 +3789,7 @@ static void __split_folio_to_order(struct folio *folio, int old_order,
*/
clear_compound_head(new_head);
if (new_order) {
- prep_compound_page(new_head, new_order);
+ __prep_compound_page(new_head, new_order);
folio_set_large_rmappable(new_folio);
}
diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h
index aeebb3e49ed1..4ce67ce2f3fb 100644
--- a/mm/internal.h
+++ b/mm/internal.h
@@ -807,6 +807,8 @@ static inline void prep_compound_tail(struct page *tail,
VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(tail->private);
}
+void __prep_compound_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order);
+
#if defined CONFIG_COMPACTION || defined CONFIG_CMA
/*
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 143776e671ab..37768fa5341b 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -683,11 +683,17 @@ static inline bool pcp_allowed_order(unsigned int order)
*/
void prep_compound_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
+{
+ __SetPageHead(page);
+ __prep_compound_page(page, order);
+}
+
+/* Set up the head and tail pages of a page that already has PG_head */
+void __prep_compound_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
{
int i;
int nr_pages = 1 << order;
- __SetPageHead(page);
for (i = 1; i < nr_pages; i++)
prep_compound_tail(page + i, page, order);
--
Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-09 15:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-06 18:28 Zi Yan
2026-11-07 19:33 ` David Hildenbrand
2026-11-09 15:26 ` Kiryl Shutsemau [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=avHktSBkWvQSakji@thinkstation \
--to=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=brendan.jackman@linux.dev \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=nico.pache@linux.dev \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=ye.liu@linux.dev \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®