From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1794241241; b=nqhXW0plQtxJ7XhI1djcLuLl73bfP1J5XremKp8LIRqVhWBzMe8nixecrBUITIitg+Hz e00yaPLAW1t9ZQyoW1EXQN08ddoR23rZYbdijsAQYyMcuZhMvm4V3KMVkotpiJAr3DLrG kmxwK0WTB1wVpNCAYfc1Y3RHUtgOx41kkl4TjyDnq9PaMbsYzbXeFFkwwNXHhu9Uc69L/ giacZQzT5iTIbOgcQWZxYtWAPtnx0SfpDAcpIBYYWvMr2LjbzenYWKktJ0fDD3QAnOJ6c pQNraXPoLIpk6hcwfmDs8vYIX661D000d2G03uHKEmn4chQJ8dzSSoQsSCVhqz76+fA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1794241241; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:Received:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID: References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; bh=/0Dk0uPlaTG6qaR2nzgxnAMSKVBZP51BhonP6B1XqbE=; b=PYOvJbmmuz/oyxhspAoTXnaFa4y+aIqBuw2jtAGqM7GO0x0NcD1BMe9ZuslOyU8N/lCK qWY09+Gv08fcKPeQad+z2m2I7SItw42Tt6qK7n9DQ8qpLx+HH1VuWHk4xA23Rr7H8e88G 4cdymxgBqAA0w+TOqFJA3vtqJxz0O1NL2yJfyZSBtunuV1UDqmSjzNGNVo6u9PhfZt8B0 wjYqCkDQZnf85WG2gFwNZKTLMzlfPJG/3Eyc0dsuQbBOGJNfBcglqvnBObF2c3WBlwHTJ 10ToFCGBOtBpO979u/bfzegd85JwROaJjOladmEsXb7GcKw8j9ksu0EVnw4NQNfLlEg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=J3gPrwc2; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81014606A32A; Mon, 9 Nov 2026 16:20:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=J3gPrwc2 Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2C6221F008A1; Mon, 9 Nov 2026 16:20:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1794241241; bh=/0Dk0uPlaTG6qaR2nzgxnAMSKVBZP51BhonP6B1XqbE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=J3gPrwc2WmZto8H3leOdSAf9aaa7knSkZ51KnpOtMRNDpWI4sa+BSXjQe8vo+yFmx hAVE6gMXu08EgqAj3+/Wwgng/DVvmYXGrQ5JSA9LzOEMCHAhDVxn9SPTfokOhN0oA4 LjaYI1E+pE7elf+ZABfzGIoeNavYDk7itmkBs3ourYwPEjEJU+SqsMJjaqpzI7Gn0m cYkw7wZpukvfygJleF8B3jU1Ih0YDEGiNqX7WauppcyKRXqSs1xsdUzLwhghruBXZZ rs+iNShfkvubFMqO3sIJo0dbZVbGwPo1y0g+cTsyufxObEe9gFMxV73yt2lUh832jo XodiEzsVS/mVA== Received: from johan by xi.lan with local (Exim 4.100.1) (envelope-from ) id 1xQS6o-0000000AXLe-2q7n; Mon, 09 Nov 2026 17:20:38 +0100 Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2026 17:20:38 +0100 From: Johan Hovold To: Bartosz Golaszewski Cc: Danilo Krummrich , Bartosz Golaszewski , Andy Shevchenko , Daniel Scally , Heikki Krogerus , Sakari Ailus , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, driver-core@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Balasubramani Vivekanandan Subject: Re: [PATCH] software node: only let the owner release a managed node Message-ID: References: <20261102-swnode-only-owner-release-v1-1-ee4c9022a629@oss.qualcomm.com> X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon, Nov 09, 2026 at 05:08:50PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > On Mon, Nov 09, 2026 at 04:55:34PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote: > > I've updated the commit with the missing Reviewed-by and Fixes tag. I > > also decided to drop the reordering of releasing the swnode references > > as that is arguable an unrelated change and the current code expects > > users to hold a reference unless it's a managed node. > > > > Ok, I won't be sending a v2 then. > > I'm not sure what the workflow is exactly among the driver core maintainers > but the commit that ended up in tree looks quite different from what > I submitted and what Link: references. Right, and the three changes are recorded in the commit trailers (and the rationale is documented in the Link thread). > Such in-tree modifications from maintainers have caused problems in the > past[1]. I would have preferred to apply changes myself based on reviews > and send a v2 which could then be queued as it appears on the list. Just > my 2 cents. Since I've already done the work, and have the context fresh in mind, another round-trip would just mean even more work. If you think it differs too much or you don't agree with the end-result, I can update the authorship. Johan