From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: Priyank Rathod <rathodpriyank@google.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>,
Ricky Wu <ricky_wu@realtek.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: pciehp: Fix NULL pointer dereference in pciehp_configure_device()
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 11:04:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <avLsH4a-l_uxlWfU@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261109215339.1841223-1-rathodpriyank@google.com>
On Mon, Nov 09, 2026 at 09:53:38PM +0000, Priyank Rathod wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2026 at 10:16:29PM +0000, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> > While this allows devices without Function 0 to be successfully hot-added,
> > will it lead to spurious teardowns upon system resume?
> ...
> > Could this spurious teardown issue be avoided by modifying
> > pciehp_device_replaced() to handle missing Function 0 devices correctly?
[...]
> Regarding the bot's question above: pciehp assumes Function 0
> (PCI_DEVFN(0, 0)) represents an occupied slot across all four of its
> lookup sites -- the -EEXIST check at the top of
> pciehp_configure_device(), pcie_init(), pciehp_device_replaced(), and
> the DSN read at the end of pciehp_configure_device() (consistent with
> PCIe r6.3 sec 7.9.3 requiring Multi-Function Devices implementing DSN to
> expose it on Function 0).
I'm not even sure whether pciehp is actually used with jailhouse,
s390 or loongarch. pciehp assumes in multiple places that function 0
is present, so guarding against a missing function 0 in a single place
doesn't really make sense.
Note that there's a patch pending which moves the cached dsn from
pciehp's struct controller to struct pci_dev, so the days are numbered
for the lines you're changing:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260902133933.2992457-7-terry.bowman@amd.com/
Are you actually observing a crash in practice because of a missing NULL
pointer check?
Thanks,
Lukas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-10 10:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-12 22:03 Priyank Rathod
[not found] ` <sashiko-outbox-168676@kernel.org>
2026-11-09 21:53 ` Priyank Rathod
2026-11-10 10:04 ` Lukas Wunner [this message]
2026-11-10 15:43 ` Niklas Schnelle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=avLsH4a-l_uxlWfU@wunner.de \
--to=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rathodpriyank@google.com \
--cc=ricky_wu@realtek.com \
--cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®