From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=194.117.254.33 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1794341188; b=dEHZ/Y2Fl6LiKMTV0OSnT6vvRaOx7ixusTsMI2XACqn7mr1UHXfVlI27tFSuomKUd1ji Zd+fTgwwMDlJKSVBXHqJ+TjcZq+TRV4WUL3xY4ewoFe/HpXdvzMJYsb8naOuXYSR8pvhc OCHMe65lH4nr6ksU8Y1h52e2NLxi2mg/dAmvn2hL/09w8ed8fdgVou+bGIimQG8UaneNv 97TCuUFU9Ixj/A6APdzhB1mwEiFnRBWXPJh/v7uRNLho2bnejUQHv5niJTltq2QumHpAi mHYpsCKsZ8jpWa+2IoJCOBGRmz2PSjElqjFUtg4AW6/YZxltzohouBqw0c8YhvyjA+Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1794341188; h=DMARC-Filter:DKIM-Signature:Received:Received:X-UD-Smtp-Session:Date: From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; bh=alD3fGtjQd9CCc7M7nbOuP3nu43HinJ6Imab9qhCwWk=; b=xOTWAsUgRcMDtPAUU5xTlHz4qy8T3C19IU3qgxWtvbgvy7XyZYAHJXi8YEUp9x4RB/jG wTuXhfkkr+NDNmbEA3+YTmk2yPnG/1P03134Pan4fXKJFcYXQ0eRhnvNrVU73nmnDrhEP +1U7oeWJhEaaeSQ7Xtl+r6p5sZ1kY4k5pt7idIlOrLaPyN+RWIageUSikg3DDHneqJfSE SpldTh8j4wXr74F9aznKAKOVTDkXpOZzPYJ2xJ9evgbQkY2pRhiyYWsiPXRcNKvD9Tb08 ZaT/GRHHTwqkECStlITZLTdCFh6hXgKsyF4xVN5gMe0WrnL6rZ9DKcekRMDGRQyh7DA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none header.from=sang-engineering.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com; dkim=pass header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k1 header.b="H+BbA/2o"; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=194.117.254.33 Received: from mail.zeus03.de (zeus03.de [194.117.254.33]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F4004606A325 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2026 20:06:26 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp.subspace.kernel.org F4004606A325 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k1 header.b=H+BbA/2o DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= sang-engineering.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=k1; bh=alD3 fGtjQd9CCc7M7nbOuP3nu43HinJ6Imab9qhCwWk=; b=H+BbA/2o2lW/5M6/l8NT tW7m23UMVgUFK1pd62lc8xhVwor3DTtfyk4b1gtqwvkwJdUeyhzGUKAxU4bj74Qh YDB0ea/8aTh/r58NjJEib+8C76I/HX2NJArp22utwcj7zu65XZ2fMOD+FJtrF17x gTk+CJNH0Fe540MGbqpSn8m/48EsxeXglyn/YXRyIlUA/kS9rMsg41rQAvcaeJ/9 7VgTMZPMaVbz0YnFhBd31TXcyKPmrGVSu48tn11a1B5dH5flCYCIHVXpAY+SNiG8 GR8K2RKFr9VTcca7cxEOk+GYYXLKGYtaSns0L9QlWRImlnzFr44dlJejtiMK3rjI pA== Received: (qmail 352277 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2026 21:06:24 +0100 Received: by mail.zeus03.de with ESMTPSA (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted, authenticated); 10 Nov 2026 21:06:24 +0100 X-UD-Smtp-Session: l3s3148p1@oH7qnPFfQNMujnsO Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 21:06:21 +0100 From: Wolfram Sang To: Johan Hovold Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski , Andi Shyti , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] i2c: dev: clean up registration Message-ID: References: <20260827102043.673273-1-johan@kernel.org> <20260827102043.673273-4-johan@kernel.org> X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: > If Wolfram insists, I can revisit this, but I don't think it's needed. Well, I can see both sides. One the one hand, it is a bit of an academic excercise, on the other hand it is more "correct". I favor the incremental approach. I won't force Johan to do something which he thinks is superfluous. But if someone interested sends such an incremental patch, I'd vote for inclusion. And with all the code analysis out there, I think such a patch will come eventually. That being said, it means I could then apply this series to my for-andi branch and add the comment I requested here myself. But I will wait until tomorrow to wait for further comments, if any.