mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" <ljs@kernel.org>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
	 Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
	 Nico Pache <nico.pache@linux.dev>,
	Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>, Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>,
	 Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>,
	Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>,
	 Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>,
	Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@kernel.org>,
	 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] mm/khugepaged: release contended mmap read lock after scanning enough VMAs
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 19:09:53 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <avNrPKIoZ3JHiAjh@gremlin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261110-khugepaged-latency-fix-v3-3-6eea743cf9a3@kernel.org>

On Tue, Nov 10, 2026 at 05:19:13PM +0000, Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) wrote:
> khugepaged walks an mm's VMAs under the mmap read lock in
> collapse_scan_mm_slot(), checking for ineligible VMAs first, and skipping
> them if encountered.
>
> It charges cc->progress 1 page against the /sys/.../pages_to_scan budget
> when these are encountered, however only checking this budget once an
> eligible PMD-spanning VMA is encountered.
>
> It can therefore hold the mmap read lock for a long time if there are a
> large number of ineligible VMAs present in an mm, over which time no mmap
> write locks (and thus no VMA write locks) can be acquired.
>
> Address this by checking whether the mmap lock is contended after 1-10
> ms (depending on CONFIG_HZ), i.e. the granularity of jiffies. This is a
> long time for a lock to be held, so is a reasonable compromise for
> determining when best to do this.

Oops I left this in from the previous approach :)

Replace with:

	Address this by checking whether the mmap lock is contended after 1024
	VMAs scanned. This was measured to take around ~100 us on a fast
	machine, and given VMA eligibility checking is a light operation, it is
	likely this will remain at the same order of magnitude for slower
	machines.

	This therefore establishes a reasonable upper bound on how long a
	contended mmap lock is held.

Thanks! :)

--
Cheers, Lorenzo

      reply	other threads:[~2026-11-10 19:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-10 17:19 [PATCH v3 0/3] mm/khugepaged: bound mmap_lock hold time when walking an mm's VMAs Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-11-10 17:19 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] Revert "mm/khugepaged: remove definition of struct khugepaged_mm_slot" Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-11-10 17:19 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] mm/khugepaged: scan mm's more efficiently under mmap_lock contention Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-11-10 17:19 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] mm/khugepaged: release contended mmap read lock after scanning enough VMAs Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-11-10 19:09   ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=avNrPKIoZ3JHiAjh@gremlin \
    --to=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=kas@kernel.org \
    --cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
    --cc=liam@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=nico.pache@linux.dev \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®