From: Hangbin Liu <hangbin.liu@linux.dev>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Cc: Gustavo Luiz Duarte <gustavold@gmail.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] selftests: netconsole: enable the targets created by the torture test
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2026 20:35:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <avRhDyP9sHREqgGP@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <avRBD4SMHnfoqn3k@gmail.com>
On Wed, Nov 11, 2026 at 02:20:08AM -0800, Breno Leitao wrote:
> Hello Hangbin,
>
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2026 at 09:58:32AM +0800, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 10, 2026 at 04:32:25AM -0800, Breno Leitao wrote:
> > > create_and_delete_random_target() is meant to create, enable and remove
> > > targets while messages are sent, but it only creates and removes them.
> > > The helper it calls, _create_dynamic_target(), stopped enabling the
> > > target when the bonding test moved that step into
> > > create_dynamic_target().
> > >
> > > Enable the targets again, so they come up while messages flow and are
> > > disabled before being removed. Like toggle_netcons_target(), ignore a
> > > failed enable, which would otherwise end the function and leave the
> > > targets behind. With a console per target, this also registers and
> > > unregisters their consoles under load.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 236682db3b6f ("selftest: netcons: add test for netconsole over bonded interfaces")
> > > Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
> > > ---
> > > tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/netconsole/netcons_torture.sh | 1 +
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/netconsole/netcons_torture.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/netconsole/netcons_torture.sh
> > > index 33a44adb6f8f3a..3dfab0bf1b0756 100755
> > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/netconsole/netcons_torture.sh
> > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/netconsole/netcons_torture.sh
> > > @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ create_and_delete_random_target() {
> > >
> > > # Basic population so the target can come up
> > > _create_dynamic_target "${FORMAT}" "${RND_TARGET_PATH}"
> > > + echo 1 > "${RND_TARGET_PATH}"/enabled 2> /dev/null || true
> > > done
> > >
> > > echo "netconsole selftest: ${COUNT} additional targets were created" > /dev/kmsg
> > >
> > > ---
> > > base-commit: b3dfbde62cf1981c4638939c159dfd087b7a72e9
> > > change-id: 20261110-netcons_selftest_fix-4cbf633295ef
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > --
> > > Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
> > >
> >
> > Ignore the failed enable makes sense to me, as we enabled `set -e`
> > and use random target.
>
> ack!
>
> > Do we need sleep 1s like create_dynamic_target() to make sure the
> > configuration loaded?
>
> I don't think we need it. The write to enabled is synchronous:
> enabled_store() sets up netpoll and moves the target to STATE_ENABLED
> before it returns. If the setup fails, enabled reads back 0, and the
> disable loop checks enabled before writing 0 to it.
>
> The other reason for that sleep, keeping the console messages in
> order, does not apply either, since the torture test does not read
> back any message.
Thanks for the explain.
Reviewed-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@kylinos.cn>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-11 12:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-10 12:32 Breno Leitao
2026-11-11 1:58 ` Hangbin Liu
2026-11-11 10:20 ` Breno Leitao
2026-11-11 12:35 ` Hangbin Liu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=avRhDyP9sHREqgGP@fedora \
--to=hangbin.liu@linux.dev \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=gustavold@gmail.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®