mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: James Hilliard <james.hilliard1@gmail.com>
Cc: "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Jiri Slaby" <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
	"Raul E Rangel" <rrangel@chromium.org>,
	"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Heikki Krogerus" <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
	"Tony Lindgren" <tony@atomide.com>,
	"Sebastian Andrzej Siewior" <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	"Richard Genoud" <richard.genoud@bootlin.com>,
	"Nicolas Ferre" <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
	"Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	"Claudiu Beznea" <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>,
	"Jacky Huang" <ychuang3@nuvoton.com>,
	"Shan-Chun Hung" <schung@nuvoton.com>,
	"Pali Rohár" <pali@kernel.org>, "Frank Li" <Frank.Li@nxp.com>,
	"Sascha Hauer" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
	"Pengutronix Kernel Team" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	"Fabio Estevam" <festevam@gmail.com>,
	"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@orcam.me.uk>,
	"Timur Tabi" <timur@kernel.org>,
	"Peter Ujfalusi" <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>,
	"Vignesh Raghavendra" <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	"Patrice Chotard" <patrice.chotard@foss.st.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, imx@lists.linux.dev,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 7/8] serial: 8250: retire canceled RX DMA before reusing the receive buffer
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2026 18:25:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <avXoY3vG0JgNdWYJ@ashevche-desk.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261111-submit-serial-8250-dma-cancel-v1-v12-7-9e3456bc2555@gmail.com>

On Wed, Nov 11, 2026 at 03:16:32PM -0700, James Hilliard wrote:
> The generic RX timeout path pauses a transfer, copies its data and
> terminates it asynchronously. Clearing rx_running at that point lets a
> new receive reuse the buffer and cookie while the old callback has not
> yet run. Inspecting the new cookie cannot distinguish that callback from
> the completion of a new transfer.
> 
> Reserve the receive buffer until a worker has drained the canceled
> callbacks. Keep FIFO access separate from callback retirement: after a
> successful pause and termination, clear rx_running while rx_terminating
> prevents another descriptor from reusing the buffer. Deliver the paused
> data before allowing the interrupt handler to drain the FIFO through PIO.
> Normal retirement only releases ownership and leaves subsequent receive
> handling to the UART interrupt.
> 
> Preserve the normal completion-path LSR read and gate DMA resubmission on
> the receive interrupt enable, so stop_rx() prevents another transfer while
> the status read retains its existing side effects.
> 
> Reject new flush work and PIO receive handling during shutdown, including
> late Intel MID DMA timeouts. Stop and drain retirement work before freeing
> the channels and buffer. Once RX has stopped, allow the idle flush used by
> DesignWare LCR recovery during shutdown. Clear the shutdown guard before
> startup configures the UART and tests its interrupts.
> 
> Check pause failures before accessing the buffer. A successful pause is
> the quiescence guarantee, even when a provider still reports IN_PROGRESS.
> Also accept DMA_COMPLETE after a failed pause: completion can stop the
> channel before its callback acquires the port lock, leaving nothing for
> the provider to pause. Retire that completed transfer normally.
> 
> A failed pause with an incomplete cookie is ambiguous: hardware may have
> finished while its completion interrupt is still pending. Initially retain
> the transfer and retry pause and status in the worker. Mask receive
> interrupts to prevent a timeout storm and keep callbacks from copying or
> resubmitting this worker-owned transfer. Back off retries from 1 ms,
> allowing completion and shutdown to wake the worker immediately.
> 
> After one second of unsuccessful pause retries, stop the transfer with
> dmaengine_terminate_sync() outside the port lock. An indefinite wait could
> otherwise leave a request/response peer waiting for data that is stuck in
> a partial DMA buffer. Report that recovery discards the pending payload:
> without a stable residue it cannot safely be copied. Keep rx_running,
> rx_pause_pending and rx_terminating set until termination has stopped DMA
> and drained its callbacks. Then restore receive handling and allow another
> DMA descriptor, without latching a permanent PIO fallback for a pause
> timeout. This trades the stalled transfer's data for continued reception.
> 
> If synchronous termination fails, retain ownership and retry with a delay
> that doubles from 1 ms to one second. Report the first failure and ongoing
> failures every five seconds for this recovery. Completion and shutdown
> wake the retry wait; shutdown takes over final channel retirement. A
> permanent termination failure still leaves RX masked and its storage
> reserved: the pause retry budget does not guarantee recovery from a
> provider that cannot stop. Each flush starts with a fresh retry budget.
> 
> RX DMA admission already requires cmd_pause. A provider whose hardware
> cannot pause must advertise that correctly. If pause nevertheless returns
> -ENOSYS or -EOPNOTSUPP for an incomplete transfer, enter synchronous
> recovery immediately. Unsupported pause, DMA_ERROR and asynchronous
> termination failure retain the error fallback to PIO until reopen.
> 
> Keep the requested enables in the existing IER shadow and filter hardware
> writes during pause retries and recovery, including termios, RS485 and
> overrun-backoff changes. Apply the current enables after retirement so
> stop_rx() and shutdown remain effective. Hold a runtime PM reference
> around worker register accesses.
> 
> Abort the DesignWare idle sequence when RX cannot be stopped. Allow the
> empty-FIFO timeout workaround once DMA has released the FIFO, including
> while callbacks retire. Exclude FIFO resets during RX DMA recovery.

...

> +static void serial8250_rx_dma_flush_work(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> +	struct uart_8250_dma *dma = container_of(work, struct uart_8250_dma, rx_flush_work);
> +	struct uart_8250_port *p = dma->port;
> +	unsigned int delay_us = 1 * USEC_PER_MSEC;
> +	ktime_t start = ktime_get();
> +	bool recover, retry, restore_rx, fallback;
> +	bool timed_out = false;
> +	int ret = 0;

Once set, it gets never cleared.

> +	guard(serial8250_rpm)(p);
> +
> +	for (;;) {
> +		scoped_guard(uart_port_lock_irqsave, &p->port) {
> +			/* Shutdown cancels this work and drains both DMA channels. */
> +			if (dma->shutting_down)
> +				return;
> +			/* Serialize reset with completion and shutdown notifications. */
> +			WRITE_ONCE(dma->rx_pause_wakeup, false);
> +			retry = dma->rx_pause_pending && !dma->rx_terminating;
> +			if (retry) {
> +				ret = serial8250_rx_dma_try_flush(p);
> +				retry = dma->rx_pause_pending && !dma->rx_terminating;
> +				if (retry &&
> +				    ktime_ms_delta(ktime_get(), start) >= 1 * MSEC_PER_SEC) {
> +					dma->rx_terminating = true;
> +					timed_out = true;
> +					retry = false;
> +				}
> +			}
> +			recover = dma->rx_err || (dma->rx_running && dma->rx_terminating);
> +			fallback = dma->rx_err;
> +		}
> +		if (!retry)
> +			break;
> +		/* Notifications also cover completion or shutdown before sleeping. */
> +		wait_event_hrtimeout(dma->rx_pause_wait, READ_ONCE(dma->rx_pause_wakeup),
> +				     ns_to_ktime(delay_us * NSEC_PER_USEC));
> +		delay_us = min(delay_us * 2, 1 * USEC_PER_SEC);
> +	}
> +
> +	if (timed_out)
> +		dev_warn(p->port.dev, "RX DMA pause timed out: %d; discarding pending data\n", ret);

So here is the potential to get timed_out == true and stale ret. Yes, I see
that code couples them, but the logic of the above is quite complicated.

The scoped_guard() piece better to be in a separate helper (and replaced with
guard()() to make it on indentation level down).

> +	if (recover) {
> +		if (serial8250_rx_dma_terminate(p))
> +			return;
> +	} else {
> +		dmaengine_synchronize(dma->rxchan);
> +	}
> +
> +	scoped_guard(uart_port_lock_irqsave, &p->port) {
> +		restore_rx = recover || dma->rx_pause_pending;
> +		dma->rx_pause_pending = false;
> +		dma->rx_terminating = false;
> +		dma->rx_running = 0;
> +		if (dma->shutting_down)
> +			return;
> +
> +		if (!restore_rx)
> +			return;
> +
> +		/* Apply the current enables, including any intervening stop_rx(). */
> +		serial8250_out_IER(p, p->ier);
> +	}
> +	if (fallback)
> +		dev_warn(p->port.dev, "RX DMA failed, using PIO\n");
>  }

...

Overall it makes me think if this is a common DMA issue when we try to stop
ongoing transfers, shouldn't it be solved once for all somewhere in DMAengine?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-12 16:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-11 22:16 [PATCH v12 0/8] serial: 8250: serialize DMA cancellation with buffer reuse James Hilliard
2026-11-11 22:16 ` [PATCH v12 1/8] serial: 8250_omap: separate locked TX DMA completion processing James Hilliard
2026-11-11 22:16 ` [PATCH v12 2/8] serial: serialize asynchronous write wakeups with the port lock James Hilliard
2026-11-12 16:11   ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-11-11 22:16 ` [PATCH v12 3/8] serial: 8250_omap: serialize RX DMA completion and flushing James Hilliard
2026-11-11 22:16 ` [PATCH v12 4/8] serial: 8250_omap: quiesce DMA IRQ handling before shutdown James Hilliard
2026-11-11 22:16 ` [PATCH v12 5/8] serial: core: allow drivers to reserve flushed transmit storage James Hilliard
2026-11-12 16:13   ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-11-11 22:16 ` [PATCH v12 6/8] serial: 8250: drain canceled TX DMA before reusing its buffer James Hilliard
2026-11-11 22:16 ` [PATCH v12 7/8] serial: 8250: retire canceled RX DMA before reusing the receive buffer James Hilliard
2026-11-12 16:25   ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2026-11-11 22:16 ` [PATCH v12 8/8] serial: 8250: retain DMA resources when termination fails James Hilliard
2026-11-12 16:28   ` Andy Shevchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=avXoY3vG0JgNdWYJ@ashevche-desk.local \
    --to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=james.hilliard1@gmail.com \
    --cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=macro@orcam.me.uk \
    --cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
    --cc=pali@kernel.org \
    --cc=patrice.chotard@foss.st.com \
    --cc=peter.ujfalusi@ti.com \
    --cc=richard.genoud@bootlin.com \
    --cc=rrangel@chromium.org \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=schung@nuvoton.com \
    --cc=timur@kernel.org \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    --cc=ychuang3@nuvoton.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®