From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
To: Wenbo Sun <sunwenbo@cmss.chinamobile.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Hangbin Liu <hangbin.liu@linux.dev>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
1342116488@qq.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3] team: validate the length of U32 and S32 option data
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2026 11:52:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <avbrzVvksHvTF89W@FV6GYCPJ69> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261113090108.175889-1-sunwenbo@cmss.chinamobile.com>
Fri, Nov 13, 2026 at 10:01:08AM +0100, sunwenbo@cmss.chinamobile.com wrote:
>In team_nl_options_set_doit(), the policy for TEAM_ATTR_OPTION_DATA in
>team_attr_option_nl_policy is NLA_BINARY because the payload layout
>varies with the option type.
>
>For TEAM_OPTION_TYPE_U32 and TEAM_OPTION_TYPE_S32, the payload is
>read directly with nla_get_u32(attr_data) and nla_get_s32(attr_data)
>without checking its attribute length. When userspace supplies a
>truncated attribute (0 to 3 bytes), nla_get_u32() or nla_get_s32()
>performs an out-of-bounds read past the attribute buffer. Conversely,
>oversized payloads (> 4 bytes) would also have trailing bytes
>silently ignored instead of being rejected as invalid input.
>
>Validate that nla_len(attr_data) equals sizeof(u32) or sizeof(s32)
>for TEAM_OPTION_TYPE_U32 and TEAM_OPTION_TYPE_S32 respectively, and
>return -EINVAL otherwise, consistent with how NLA_U32/NLA_S32
>attributes are validated and similar to commit 5bef3ac184b5 ("team:
>better TEAM_OPTION_TYPE_STRING validation").
>
>This issue was identified with the assistance of an LLM-based code
>review of Netlink option handlers in the team driver, confirmed by
>sending malformed U32 (notify_peers_count) and S32 (priority) option
>attributes on a UML kernel, and verified after the patch that
>invalid lengths (0..3, 5, and 8 bytes) are rejected with -EINVAL while
>valid 4-byte options still work as expected.
>
>Built with W=1 on UML, x86_64 allmodconfig, and x86_64 allyesconfig with
>zero new warnings or errors.
>
>Fixes: 3d249d4ca7d0 ("net: introduce ethernet teaming device")
>Fixes: 69821638b274 ("team: add signed 32-bit team option type")
>Signed-off-by: Wenbo Sun <sunwenbo@cmss.chinamobile.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-13 10:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-13 9:01 Wenbo Sun
2026-11-13 10:52 ` Jiri Pirko [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=avbrzVvksHvTF89W@FV6GYCPJ69 \
--to=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=1342116488@qq.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=hangbin.liu@linux.dev \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sunwenbo@cmss.chinamobile.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®