From: Alejandro Colomar <alx+linux-hardening@kernel.org>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@orcam.me.uk>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@kernel.org>,
Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>, Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Tom Zanussi <zanussi@kernel.org>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, driver-core@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 02/19] string: Add strprefix()
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2026 20:00:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <avitCbGKfZgrfh3e@devuan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <32e7bdb5b8a4a522566b00763ba13974733290dd.camel@perches.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2290 bytes --]
Hi Joe,
> Date: 2026-11-14 10:24:26-0800
> From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
>
> On Sat, 2026-11-14 at 17:59 +0100, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> > > A negative of this is that it implies the return should
> > > always be tested even though it can be known that the
> > > return is effectively bool.
> >
> > I'm not sure I follow. The attribute is about the arguments, not the
> > return value. Perhaps I don't understand what you mean by "this".
>
> 'this' is the return of the strprefix function itself.
>
> It returns either a const char * or a char * or NULL.
>
> Because it can return NULL, then the return value
> could/should be tested.
Yes, it must be tested, when not used as a boolean.
The usual replacement of
s += str_has_prefix(s, prefix);
would be
s = strprefix(s, prefix) ?: s;
The boolean use remains trivial:
- return strstarts(name, ".init") ||
- strstarts(name, ".ARM.extab.init") ||
- strstarts(name, ".ARM.exidx.init");
+ return strprefix(name, ".init") ||
+ strprefix(name, ".ARM.extab.init") ||
+ strprefix(name, ".ARM.exidx.init");
and
- if (!str_has_prefix(p, "console=") && !strstr(p, " console=")) {
+ if (!strprefix(p, "console=") && !strstr(p, " console=")) {
The non-boolean use would look like this (actual diffs from the patch
set):
- prefix_len = str_has_prefix(name, PDSC_FW_COMPONENT_PREFIX);
- if (prefix_len)
- name += prefix_len;
+ name = strprefix(name, PDSC_FW_COMPONENT_PREFIX) ?: name;
(the old code, actually, didn't need that test, and could have been
simply 'name += str_has_prefix(name, PDSC_FW_COMPONENT_PREFIX);')
and
- len = str_has_prefix(*str, "brl,");
- if (len) {
+ p = strprefix(*str, "brl,");
+ if (p) {
*brl_options = "";
- *str += len;
+ *str = p;
return 0;
}
and
cmp = strstrip(option);
- len = str_has_prefix(cmp, "no");
- if (len)
+ p = strprefix(cmp, "no");
+ if (p) {
neg = 1;
-
- cmp += len;
+ cmp = p;
+ }
Have a lovely night!
Alex
--
<https://www.alejandro-colomar.es>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-14 19:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-14 15:21 [PATCH v6 00/19] Add strprefix() and fix a bug with it Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-14 15:21 ` [PATCH v6 01/19] string: Add streq() Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-14 15:22 ` [PATCH v6 02/19] string: Add strprefix() Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-14 15:28 ` Joe Perches
2026-11-14 17:03 ` Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-14 18:35 ` Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-14 15:53 ` Joe Perches
2026-11-14 16:59 ` Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-14 18:24 ` Joe Perches
2026-11-14 19:00 ` Alejandro Colomar [this message]
2026-11-14 15:22 ` [PATCH v6 03/19] string: Document corner-case misbehavior in str_has_prefix() for empty prefix Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-14 15:22 ` [PATCH v6 04/19] device property: Fix fwnode_name_eq() for empty node names Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-14 15:22 ` [PATCH v6 05/19] stddef: Add const_cast() Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-14 15:22 ` [PATCH v6 06/19] string: Add [C]QChar_of() and QVoid_of() Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-14 15:22 ` [PATCH v6 07/19] string: Make strprefix() const-qualifier-generic Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-14 15:22 ` [PATCH v6 08/19] perf map: Use bool for return type instead of int Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-14 15:22 ` [PATCH v6 09/19] string: Make strstarts() a legacy alias for strprefix() Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-14 15:23 ` [PATCH v6 10/19] platform/x86: hp-bioscfg: Rename local variable Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-14 16:04 ` Joe Perches
2026-11-14 17:08 ` Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-14 15:23 ` [PATCH v6 11/19] treewide: s/strstarts/strprefix/g Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-14 15:23 ` [PATCH v6 12/19] string: Remove strstarts() Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-14 15:23 ` [PATCH v6 13/19] s390/test_unwind: Use bool for booleans Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-14 15:23 ` [PATCH v6 14/19] treewide: Replace boolean uses of str_has_prefix() by strprefix() Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-14 15:23 ` [PATCH v6 15/19] treewide: Replace some " Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-14 15:23 ` [PATCH v6 16/19] string: Add strsuffix() Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-14 15:24 ` [PATCH v6 17/19] string: Make strends() a legacy alias for strsuffix() Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-14 15:24 ` [PATCH v6 18/19] treewide: s/\<strends\>/strsuffix/g Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-14 15:24 ` [PATCH v6 19/19] string: Remove strends() Alejandro Colomar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=avitCbGKfZgrfh3e@devuan \
--to=alx+linux-hardening@kernel.org \
--cc=alx@kernel.org \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=brgl@kernel.org \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=djrscally@gmail.com \
--cc=driver-core@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linusw@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=macro@orcam.me.uk \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=saravanak@kernel.org \
--cc=schwab@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=zanussi@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®