mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ken Chen" <kenchen@google.com>
To: "Ray Lee" <ray-lk@madrabbit.org>
Cc: "Andrey Borzenkov" <arvidjaar@mail.ru>,
	"Uwe Bugla" <uwe.bugla@gmx.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Michal Piotrowski" <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: bug in 2.6.22-rc2: loop mount limited to one single iso image
Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 23:08:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b040c32a0705202308h7fda56c1r85bac3ce4c172488@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2c0942db0705192316s2682807chd23df6f4de29edcb@mail.gmail.com>

On 5/19/07, Ray Lee <ray-lk@madrabbit.org> wrote:
> Yeah, that's the only one left. I was hoping it wasn't that one, as it
> claimed to have been tested extensively. Guess it wasn't tested with
> udev.
>
> Ken? Ball's in your court. As the patch isn't providing a killer
> feature for 2.6.22, I'd suggest just reverting it for now until the
> issues are ironed out.

The real solution is to have the user space tool to create these
device nodes in advance.

The original loop patch was coded such that when we open a loop device
N, the immediate adjacent device "N + 1" is created.  This will keep
"mount -o loop" happy because it typically does a linear scan to find
a free device.  This might be somewhat hackary, but certainly will be
backward compatible before user space solution is deployed.

However, the code was removed by Al in this commit:

commit 07002e995638b83a6987180f43722a0eb39d4932
Author: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Date:   Sat May 12 16:23:15 2007 -0400

    fix the dynamic allocation and probe in loop.c

    Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
    Acked-by: Ken Chen <kenchen@google.com>
    Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-05-21  6:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-19 18:33 Ray Lee
2007-05-19 19:17 ` Andrey Borzenkov
     [not found]   ` <200705200124.13026.uwe.bugla@gmx.de>
2007-05-20  4:45     ` Andrey Borzenkov
2007-05-20  6:16       ` Ray Lee
2007-05-20  6:28         ` Al Viro
2007-05-20  6:58           ` Andrey Borzenkov
2007-05-20 14:52             ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-20 15:26               ` Ray Lee
2007-05-20 15:22           ` Ray Lee
2007-05-20 15:54             ` Kay Sievers
2007-05-20 16:02               ` Andrey Borzenkov
2007-05-20 16:23                 ` Andreas Schwab
2007-05-20 16:10               ` Ray Lee
2007-05-20 16:16                 ` Kay Sievers
2007-05-20 16:29                   ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-20 19:53                     ` Michael Mauch
2007-05-21 16:11                   ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-21 16:27                     ` Ken Chen
2007-05-21 16:35                       ` Ray Lee
2007-05-21 16:37                       ` Ken Chen
2007-05-21 16:50                         ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-21 17:11                           ` Kay Sievers
2007-05-21 17:51                             ` Andrey Borzenkov
2007-05-21 17:04                         ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-21 20:48                         ` Ken Chen
2007-05-21 21:20                           ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-21 22:04                             ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-22  0:10                     ` Al Viro
2007-05-22  0:13                       ` Al Viro
2007-05-20 16:09             ` Andrey Borzenkov
2007-05-20 16:14               ` Ray Lee
2007-05-22 20:18           ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-22 21:35             ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-21  6:08         ` Ken Chen [this message]
2007-05-21  6:40           ` Ray Lee
2007-05-21  7:59             ` Uwe Bugla
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-05-19 13:53 Uwe Bugla

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b040c32a0705202308h7fda56c1r85bac3ce4c172488@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=kenchen@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arvidjaar@mail.ru \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com \
    --cc=ray-lk@madrabbit.org \
    --cc=uwe.bugla@gmx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®