mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Xu, Yanfei" <yanfei.xu@windriver.com>
To: paulmck@kernel.org
Cc: rcu@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [Qestion] Is preempt_disable/enable needed in non-preemption code path
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 23:04:05 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b068d707-0ac7-4840-a297-112731972d8a@windriver.com> (raw)

Hi experts,

I am learning rcu mechanism and its codes. When looking at the 
rcu_blocking_is_gp(), I found there is a pair preemption disable/enable 
operation in non-preemption code path. And it has been a long time. I 
can't understand why we need it? Is there some thing I missed? If not, 
can we remove the unnecessary operation like blow?


diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index da6f5213fb74..c6d95a00715e 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -3703,7 +3703,6 @@ static int rcu_blocking_is_gp(void)
         if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPTION))
                 return rcu_scheduler_active == RCU_SCHEDULER_INACTIVE;
         might_sleep();  /* Check for RCU read-side critical section. */
-       preempt_disable();
         /*
          * If the rcu_state.n_online_cpus counter is equal to one,
          * there is only one CPU, and that CPU sees all prior accesses
@@ -3718,7 +3717,6 @@ static int rcu_blocking_is_gp(void)
          * Those memory barriers are provided by CPU-hotplug code.
          */
         ret = READ_ONCE(rcu_state.n_online_cpus) <= 1;
-       preempt_enable();
         return ret;
  }



Best regards,
Yanfei

             reply	other threads:[~2021-04-15 15:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-15 15:04 Xu, Yanfei [this message]
2021-04-15 15:43 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-15 16:18   ` Xu, Yanfei
2021-04-15 17:01     ` Xu, Yanfei
2021-04-15 17:15       ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-15 17:07     ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-16 10:51       ` Xu, Yanfei
2021-04-16 17:26         ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-19  4:58           ` Xu, Yanfei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b068d707-0ac7-4840-a297-112731972d8a@windriver.com \
    --to=yanfei.xu@windriver.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®