From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fllvem-ot03.ext.ti.com (fllvem-ot03.ext.ti.com [198.47.19.245]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D4AC3FE7; Fri, 13 Jun 2025 19:36:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.47.19.245 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1749843376; cv=none; b=DjU/PcN0nYecZ1Mul5HIDwOC6mQmyb/buMLGH2DERExArViIeN87Ocx6zmt/clwbrfsOOek6rdAGYDpmlym/6BYy7YnxPpX8w69bqrYs7hLmM4yBOKg7CuFj9WkhmqGERy4x0ow2XcuOzGBFVpY+u6/POcM1Hd4/ipYUx5E95GI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1749843376; c=relaxed/simple; bh=W4I5UKFGEei0TFtNkAiGwf0mYsRbiWddQC+MdG717DU=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:CC:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=p2GslI4YCmzDoa1vV2sujhfAb2BzxnjVvpty5WghwwMHiyLStFXtvHYsV5wc/wG1wEpVSz6at/rOlojpVP0Kijg8LAzDkC0ap4IyZXKCXCT0wU3DQG6MLZ2UZWA1isTNeZynrxVx7ggNEeoH8k6q1O3shS+NOP49s8kOULRisa8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ti.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b=oqNI0oqZ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.47.19.245 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ti.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="oqNI0oqZ" Received: from fllvem-sh04.itg.ti.com ([10.64.41.54]) by fllvem-ot03.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 55DJZo4K3212181; Fri, 13 Jun 2025 14:35:50 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1749843350; bh=c/WDngCiRjpG1UxqqDCPOLzohqNN1YopoW5BhaboqDE=; h=Date:Subject:To:CC:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=oqNI0oqZ6OOD6G0vIoYdvJC0Un0InQXPjzjaSm+GptKPTc+xCYMSwfTbFcm3yJ8MS 7PDScGB+vh/9RjgBtCgHIOBq33EgBOmXAaAZg26f/VGPjAWx2P0LES9YyqBxVcgq8J y4VeiyL+lbzz+0lsW5cJz5Yzh044qYLZxbtVbySY= Received: from DLEE109.ent.ti.com (dlee109.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.41]) by fllvem-sh04.itg.ti.com (8.18.1/8.18.1) with ESMTPS id 55DJZod32950749 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 13 Jun 2025 14:35:50 -0500 Received: from DLEE113.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.24) by DLEE109.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2507.55; Fri, 13 Jun 2025 14:35:49 -0500 Received: from lelvem-mr06.itg.ti.com (10.180.75.8) by DLEE113.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2507.55 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 13 Jun 2025 14:35:49 -0500 Received: from [128.247.29.251] (dmz007xyy.dhcp.ti.com [128.247.29.251]) by lelvem-mr06.itg.ti.com (8.18.1/8.18.1) with ESMTP id 55DJZnj74021381; Fri, 13 Jun 2025 14:35:49 -0500 Message-ID: Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 14:35:49 -0500 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: tps65219: Update TPS65214 MFD cell's GPIO compatible string To: Lee Jones CC: , , , , , , , , , References: <20250527190455.169772-1-s-ramamoorthy@ti.com> <20250527190455.169772-2-s-ramamoorthy@ti.com> <20250613131538.GS381401@google.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Shree Ramamoorthy Organization: PMIC In-Reply-To: <20250613131538.GS381401@google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-C2ProcessedOrg: 333ef613-75bf-4e12-a4b1-8e3623f5dcea On 6/13/25 8:15 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > On Tue, 27 May 2025, Shree Ramamoorthy wrote: > >> This patch reflects the change made to move TPS65215 from 1 GPO and 1 GPIO >> to 2 GPOs and 1 GPIO. TPS65215 and TPS65219 both have 2 GPOs and 1 GPIO. >> TPS65214 has 1 GPO and 1 GPIO. TPS65215 will reuse the TPS65219 GPIO >> compatible string. >> >> TPS65214 TRM: https://www.ti.com/lit/pdf/slvud30 >> TPS65215 TRM: https://www.ti.com/lit/pdf/slvucw5/ >> >> Fixes: 7947219ab1a2 ("mfd: tps65219: Add support for TI TPS65214 PMIC") >> Signed-off-by: Shree Ramamoorthy >> --- >> drivers/mfd/tps65219.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/tps65219.c b/drivers/mfd/tps65219.c >> index fd390600fbf0..297511025dd4 100644 >> --- a/drivers/mfd/tps65219.c >> +++ b/drivers/mfd/tps65219.c >> @@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ static const struct resource tps65219_regulator_resources[] = { >> >> static const struct mfd_cell tps65214_cells[] = { >> MFD_CELL_RES("tps65214-regulator", tps65214_regulator_resources), >> - MFD_CELL_NAME("tps65215-gpio"), >> + MFD_CELL_NAME("tps65214-gpio"), > Neither of these exist anywhere. > > I'll assume they will be available soon. I'll be upstreaming v5 of this gpio series [0] after I complete internal reviews! [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250425203315.71497-1-s-ramamoorthy@ti.com/ > >> }; >> >> static const struct mfd_cell tps65215_cells[] = { >> -- >> 2.43.0 >> -- Best, Shree Ramamoorthy PMIC Software Engineer