mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
To: Richard Cheng <icheng@nvidia.com>,
	dave@stgolabs.net, jic23@kernel.org, alison.schofield@intel.com,
	vishal.l.verma@intel.com
Cc: iweiny@kernel.org, ming.li@zohomail.com, gourry@gourry.net,
	rrichter@amd.com, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kees@kernel.org,
	newtonl@nvidia.com, kristinc@nvidia.com, kaihengf@nvidia.com,
	kobak@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 7/7] cxl/fwctl: Propagate feature RPC delivery errors
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2026 16:51:56 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b0741acd-327d-43ce-94d8-8f06730e2430@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260813034538.13189-8-icheng@nvidia.com>



On 8/12/26 8:45 PM, Richard Cheng wrote:
> FWCTL_RPC requires delivery failures to be returned as ioctl errors,
> while device errors are reported in the output. Get and Set Feature
> instead converted all failures into normal responses, sometimes with a
> SUCCESS device status.
> 
> Initialize the return code to SUCCESS. When the helper fails without a
> device error code, return its errno. Continue reporting actual device
> errors through rpc_out->retval.
> 
> Fixes: 5908f3ed6dc2 ("cxl: Add support to handle user feature commands for get feature")
> Fixes: eb5dfcb9e36d ("cxl: Add support to handle user feature commands for set feature")
> Signed-off-by: Richard Cheng <icheng@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cxl/core/features.c | 9 +++++++--
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/features.c b/drivers/cxl/core/features.c
> index 8d44ce829497..30e00faaf3a9 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/features.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/features.c
> @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ ssize_t cxl_get_feature(struct cxl_mailbox *cxl_mbox, const uuid_t *feat_uuid,
>  	int rc;
>  
>  	if (return_code)
> -		*return_code = CXL_MBOX_CMD_RC_INPUT;
> +		*return_code = CXL_MBOX_CMD_RC_SUCCESS;

With "success" set here, should we drop setting of *return_code at the end of function since it's no longer necessary?

>  
>  	if (!feat_out || !feat_out_size)
>  		return -EINVAL;
> @@ -289,7 +289,7 @@ int cxl_set_feature(struct cxl_mailbox *cxl_mbox,
>  	size_t hdr_size;
>  
>  	if (return_code)
> -		*return_code = CXL_MBOX_CMD_RC_INPUT;
> +		*return_code = CXL_MBOX_CMD_RC_SUCCESS;

I think similar for this function as the previous comment?

DJ

>  
>  	if (feat_data_size > U16_MAX - offset)
>  		return -EINVAL;
> @@ -492,6 +492,9 @@ static void *cxlctl_get_feature(struct cxl_features_state *cxlfs,
>  	data_size = cxl_get_feature(cxl_mbox, &feat_in->uuid,
>  				    feat_in->selection, rpc_out->payload,
>  				    count, offset, &return_code);
> +	if (data_size < 0 &&
> +	    return_code == CXL_MBOX_CMD_RC_SUCCESS)
> +		return ERR_PTR(data_size);
>  	*out_len = sizeof(struct fwctl_rpc_cxl_out);
>  	if (data_size <= 0) {
>  		rpc_out->size = 0;
> @@ -544,6 +547,8 @@ static void *cxlctl_set_feature(struct cxl_features_state *cxlfs,
>  	rc = cxl_set_feature(cxl_mbox, &feat_in->uuid,
>  			     feat_in->version, feat_in->feat_data,
>  			     data_size, flags, offset, &return_code);
> +	if (rc && return_code == CXL_MBOX_CMD_RC_SUCCESS)
> +		return ERR_PTR(rc);
>  	*out_len = sizeof(*rpc_out);
>  	if (rc) {
>  		rpc_out->retval = return_code;


      reply	other threads:[~2026-08-18 23:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-13  3:45 [PATCH v5 0/7] cxl: Sashiko bug fixes Richard Cheng
2026-08-13  3:45 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] cxl/features: Reject feature offset that overflows 16-bit field Richard Cheng
2026-08-13  3:45 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] cxl/region: Scan all partitions for unmapped poison Richard Cheng
2026-08-13  3:45 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] cxl/region: Don't leak tolerated RAM -EFAULT from unmapped poison scan Richard Cheng
2026-08-13  3:45 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] cxl/region: Start unmapped poison scan at the committed decoder boundary Richard Cheng
2026-08-19 15:51   ` Dave Jiang
2026-08-13  3:45 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] cxl/memdev: Don't overwrite the error from an earlier partition poison query Richard Cheng
2026-08-19 15:55   ` Dave Jiang
2026-08-13  3:45 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] cxl/region: Reject poison scan for decoder without a partition Richard Cheng
2026-08-13  3:45 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] cxl/fwctl: Propagate feature RPC delivery errors Richard Cheng
2026-08-18 23:51   ` Dave Jiang [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b0741acd-327d-43ce-94d8-8f06730e2430@intel.com \
    --to=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=gourry@gourry.net \
    --cc=icheng@nvidia.com \
    --cc=iweiny@kernel.org \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=kaihengf@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=kobak@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kristinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.li@zohomail.com \
    --cc=newtonl@nvidia.com \
    --cc=rrichter@amd.com \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®