From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7F8ECA9ECF for ; Sat, 2 Nov 2019 00:48:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A2DB208CB for ; Sat, 2 Nov 2019 00:48:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=redchan.it header.i=@redchan.it header.b="TdyK6ftc" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727984AbfKBAsa (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Nov 2019 20:48:30 -0400 Received: from mx1.cock.li ([185.10.68.5]:54043 "EHLO cock.li" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726771AbfKBAsa (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Nov 2019 20:48:30 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=redchan.it; s=mail; t=1572655705; bh=q5GnTzAglDVLZVNwokGYpKpvnvZNg5pNuSSM0u+V7Zs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=TdyK6ftcpEKRAekW7yQRLB3R3w7Fwhdc6VuL/fbzIdTEdC2yt58cIqLXo7TkSftcQ Ys6u0Qrtg+82W3AUfsmO69o/w9CODihHw0qPkqT7FwHmhH1HvP45XfljWtWMbCFYnD IA/g0JwlJ526TjvA2jfKhNSK5wtRb8ag+SpYCx463FAGt9I3qhV/HsBDUD4lOcHutW 0Za0miri62owmbVKF4/AP6HokrqJfojejuzTagw5B0JpmLSDHwWz9zAjaqNDl398xj cvnQdcLLYUzoLbukX8QZ7gchREfVKfLAUcaMbwck+k7/IB8GolX6jUX4XZ3YkEQEqE nudMPrJh2Rpnw== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2019 00:48:25 +0000 From: gameonlinux@redchan.it To: Jean Louis Cc: gnu-system-discuss@gnu.org, bruce@perens.com, rms@gnu.org, esr@thyrsus.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, ams@gnu.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: (Censored) Why will no-one sue GrSecurity for their blatant GPL violation (of GCC and the linux kernel)? In-Reply-To: <20191101070258.GK3889@protected.rcdrun.com> References: <20191101070258.GK3889@protected.rcdrun.com> Message-ID: X-Sender: gameonlinux@redchan.it User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.6 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I have a law license, I don't need to read about who has standing to sue, and how to do so (Copyright Litigation (COPYLITG on Westlaw) is good enough for that). I want to know why you guys (Fsf for the GCC plugins, and various kernel copyright holders for the kernel patch) will not sue GrSecurity, and why there is no discussion. You just won't discuss this blatant foundational violation. Why has my post been spam filtered/black holed. On 2019-11-01 07:02, Jean Louis wrote: > * gameonlinux@redchan.it [2019-11-01 00:03]: >> I tried to send this to the list, but it was dropped as spam, which is >> no >> surprise since the some want to screen communications to RMS and thus >> control him. > > ... cut... > >> Wouldn't the FSF have standing regarding the GCC plugins atleast? >> Couldn't you all rally linux-kernel copyright holders to bring a joint >> action? >> >> References: >> perens.com/2017/06/28/warning-grsecurity-potential-contributory-infringement-risk-for-customers/ >> >> perens.com/static/OSS_Spenger_v_Perens/0_2018cv15189/docs1/pdf/18.pdf >> (Page 10 onward of this brief gives a good recitation of the facts and >> issues > > Recommended reads: > > Enforcing the GNU GPL by Eben Moglen > https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/enforcing-gpl.html > > and > > The Principles of Community-Oriented GPL Enforcement by Joshua Gay > https://www.fsf.org/licensing/enforcement-principles > > Jean