From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>
To: "Thomas Weißschuh" <linux@weissschuh.net>,
"kernel test robot" <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Simon Horman" <horms@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: include/linux/compiler_types.h:397:45: error: call to '__compiletime_assert_810' declared with attribute error: BUILD_BUG_ON failed: skb_ext_total_length() > 255
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2023 10:12:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b091f9d3-14e9-4f2c-bf98-9a207cef412a@app.fastmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3fb66648-5581-4371-b15e-23e52e6469ba@t-8ch.de>
On Sun, Dec 17, 2023, at 17:13, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> +Cc Arnd who was taking care of CFLAGS_GCOV in the past.
>
> On 2023-12-17 19:39:34+0800, kernel test robot wrote:
>> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202312171924.4FozI5FG-lkp@intel.com/
>>
>> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>>
>> In file included from <command-line>:
>> In function 'skb_extensions_init',
>> inlined from 'skb_init' at net/core/skbuff.c:4848:2:
>> >> include/linux/compiler_types.h:397:45: error: call to '__compiletime_assert_810' declared with attribute error: BUILD_BUG_ON failed: skb_ext_total_length() > 255
I tried to count the actual number of bytes and got to a worst case of 200
bytes (for 64-bit machines), but this may have been wrong. I can think of two
possible things that may have caused the problem:
a) there is an actual overflow but gcc fails to realize it without GCOV
b) the compile-time calculation goes wrong and is no longer a constant
value, so the assertion fails to evaluate
We can probably elinminate a) if you can show that raising the limit does
not avoid the problem.
> [..]
>
> This seems to be a compiler bug/configuration issue.
>
> When I remove the entry for SKB_EXT_MCTP from skb_ext_type_len then the
> error goes away. However this entry works the same as all other entries.
>
> Also dropping -fno-tree-loop-im *or* -fprofile-arcs from CFLAGS_GCOV
> makes the code compile as-is.
>
> Or switching to a 64bit build...
The -fno-tree-loop-im option would likely stop the loop from getting
unrolled, which is how the skb_ext_total_length() return code is no
longer constant.
Does manually unrolling this loop avoid the problem?
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-18 10:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-17 11:39 kernel test robot
2023-12-17 17:13 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-12-18 10:12 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2023-12-18 11:11 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-12-18 12:03 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b091f9d3-14e9-4f2c-bf98-9a207cef412a@app.fastmail.com \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@weissschuh.net \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®