From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161119AbWGNOxf (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Jul 2006 10:53:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161120AbWGNOxf (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Jul 2006 10:53:35 -0400 Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com ([64.233.162.194]:36487 "EHLO nz-out-0102.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161119AbWGNOxe (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Jul 2006 10:53:34 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Q4OP9fbuDpH++frXN6/JeRcJ8i6Elwof9kRJJCbzLhS9UJLEGuzpomzlpIyhWC4598qLwBEF5IAE8p0XT3CSJrrPxWS3Ji4OlwS/4d4CAC7anLwq83gX41z7QtLqQ1oeie8T23HxtJg+VRryPEnwXN0TCuTny1TQmiBLQsrlOZ4= Message-ID: Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 15:53:33 +0100 From: "Catalin Marinas" To: "Michal Piotrowski" Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] Kernel memory leak detector 0.8 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <6bffcb0e0607131214l68232de8lf8cf03f805822f07@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060710220901.5191.66488.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <6bffcb0e0607110902u4e24a4f2jc6acf2eb4c3bae93@mail.gmail.com> <6bffcb0e0607111000q228673a9kcbc6c91f76331885@mail.gmail.com> <6bffcb0e0607120435x31eceab7r3fdb055a7bee6da2@mail.gmail.com> <6bffcb0e0607121555n20a9df53q8589109024629f7a@mail.gmail.com> <6bffcb0e0607131214l68232de8lf8cf03f805822f07@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 13/07/06, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > After applying context_struct_to_string-not-leak.patch and reverting > alloc_skb-false-positive.patch I haven't noticed that soft lockup. You still need the apply alloc_skb-false-positive.patch as it just avoids a false positive (I'll add it to kmemleak 0.9). Does anything change with this (and the context_struct_... one)? > Here is something new > orphan pointer 0xf40d61ac (size 1536): > c017392a: <__kmalloc_track_caller> > c01631b1: <__kzalloc> > f98869cd: > f9888a1d: > c02b17b6: > c02b2e94: > c02e6e17: > c02e8a02: This looks like a leak but I couldn't find anything obvious with the code. I'll keep looking. > http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/files/o_bugs/kml/ml2/ > http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/files/o_bugs/kml/ml3/ I would also need to investigate why the report shows some orphan pointers without any back-trace information. It seems to disappear after a while. Thanks. -- Catalin