mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@iki.fi>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
	Pawel Osciak <pawel@osciak.com>,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>,
	Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>,
	Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas.dufresne@collabora.com>,
	Luis de Bethencourt <luisbg@osg.samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [media] vb2: map dmabuf for planes on driver queue instead of vidioc_qbuf
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 10:06:42 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b0c71d30-4392-e404-c41b-923bcb5bcc2a@osg.samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160720132005.GC7976@valkosipuli.retiisi.org.uk>

Hello Sakari,

On 07/20/2016 09:20 AM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Hi Javier,
> 
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 12:26:06PM -0400, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> The buffer planes' dma-buf are currently mapped when buffers are queued
>> from userspace but it's more appropriate to do the mapping when buffers
>> are queued in the driver since that's when the actual DMA operation are
>> going to happen.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas.dufresne@collabora.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> A side effect of this change is that if the dmabuf map fails for some
>> reasons (i.e: a driver using the DMA contig memory allocator but CMA
>> not being enabled), the fail will no longer happen on VIDIOC_QBUF but
>> later (i.e: in VIDIOC_STREAMON).
>>
>> I don't know if that's an issue though but I think is worth mentioning.
> 
> I have the same question has Hans --- why?
>

Yes, sorry for missing this information. Nicolas already explained a little
bit but the context is that I want to add dma-buf fence support to videobuf2,
and currently the dma-buf is unmapped in VIDIOC_DQBUF.

But with dma-buf fence, the idea is to be able to dequeue a buffer even when
the driver has not yet finished processing the buffer. So the dma-buf needs to
be mapped until vb2_buffer_done() when the driver is done processing the vb2,
and is able to signal the pending fence.

Since the unmapping was going to be delayed to vb2_buffer_done(), I thought
it would make sense to also move the mapping closer to when is really going
to be used and that's why I moved it to __enqueue_in_driver() in this patch.

But I didn't know that user-space was using the dma-buf map as a way to know
if the dma-buf will be compatible and fallback to a different streaming I/O
method if that's not the case. So $SUBJECT is wrong if it prevents user-space
to recover gracefully from a dma-buf mapping failure.

In any case, only delaying the unmapping is needed to support fence and doing
the map early in VIDIOC_QBUF is not an issue.
 
> I rather think we should keep the buffers mapped all the time. That'd
> require a bit of extra from the DMA-BUF framework I suppose, to support
> streaming mappings.
> 

Interesting, I can take a look to this possibility after adding the dma-buf
fence support.

Best regards,
-- 
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America

  reply	other threads:[~2016-07-20 14:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-15 16:26 Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-07-15 19:42 ` Shuah Khan
2016-07-15 21:50   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-07-16 12:15 ` Luis de Bethencourt
2016-07-18  8:01 ` Michael Olbrich
2016-07-18  8:34 ` Hans Verkuil
2016-07-18 13:30   ` Nicolas Dufresne
2016-07-18 14:15   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-09-06 18:27   ` Nicolas Dufresne
2016-07-18 10:27 ` Marek Szyprowski
2016-09-06 18:31   ` Nicolas Dufresne
2016-07-20 13:20 ` Sakari Ailus
2016-07-20 14:06   ` Javier Martinez Canillas [this message]
2016-07-20 14:12     ` Hans Verkuil
2016-07-20 14:19       ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-09-06 18:34   ` Nicolas Dufresne

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b0c71d30-4392-e404-c41b-923bcb5bcc2a@osg.samsung.com \
    --to=javier@osg.samsung.com \
    --cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luisbg@osg.samsung.com \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=mchehab@s-opensource.com \
    --cc=nicolas.dufresne@collabora.com \
    --cc=pawel@osciak.com \
    --cc=sakari.ailus@iki.fi \
    --cc=shuahkh@osg.samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®