From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
To: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
joro@8bytes.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
rafael@kernel.org, Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@google.com>,
Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
driver-core@lists.linux.dev, Sonang Patel <sonangp@nvidia.com>,
Ankit Agrawal <ankita@nvidia.com>,
shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] dma-mapping: Keep DMA memory private for capable devices
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2026 11:10:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b1058c89-2e87-4035-b7be-76e93fe3ac07@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a2a5fe1a1c4d8c99d96874a166f77996d51f3cb7.1793676742.git.nicolinc@nvidia.com>
On 03.11.2026 04:49, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> Architecture code can require devices to use unencrypted memory. This makes
> the DMA API use shared memory for coherent allocations and bounce streaming
> mappings through SWIOTLB.
>
> A device marked with DEV_FLAG_DMA_CC_PRIVATE can reach private memory
> directly. Add dma_require_decrypted() to combine force_dma_unencrypted()
> with the new device flag, and use it throughout the generic DMA code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
The change look good, but I'm not really happy to see the mix of unencrypted
and decrypted terms. Wasn't there a consensus which one will be used?
> ---
> include/linux/dma-direct.h | 7 ++++++-
> kernel/dma/direct.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> kernel/dma/mapping.c | 2 +-
> kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-direct.h b/include/linux/dma-direct.h
> index daa31a1adf7b0..fb35ca27941cc 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dma-direct.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dma-direct.h
> @@ -134,6 +134,11 @@ static inline bool force_dma_unencrypted(struct device *dev)
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_FORCE_DMA_UNENCRYPTED */
>
> +static inline bool dma_require_decrypted(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + return !dev_dma_cc_private(dev) && force_dma_unencrypted(dev);
> +}
> +
> static inline bool dma_capable(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t addr, size_t size,
> bool is_ram, unsigned long attrs)
> {
> @@ -146,7 +151,7 @@ static inline bool dma_capable(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t addr, size_t size,
> * requires unencrypted DMA addresses. Treat it as not DMA-capable
> * so the caller can fall back to a suitable SWIOTLB pool.
> */
> - if (!(attrs & DMA_ATTR_CC_SHARED) && force_dma_unencrypted(dev))
> + if (!(attrs & DMA_ATTR_CC_SHARED) && dma_require_decrypted(dev))
> return false;
>
> if (is_ram && !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT) &&
> diff --git a/kernel/dma/direct.c b/kernel/dma/direct.c
> index 25e9a86835fd3..b3b9ff090c590 100644
> --- a/kernel/dma/direct.c
> +++ b/kernel/dma/direct.c
> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ static inline struct page *dma_direct_to_page(struct device *dev,
>
> u64 dma_direct_get_required_mask(struct device *dev)
> {
> - bool require_decrypted = force_dma_unencrypted(dev);
> + bool require_decrypted = dma_require_decrypted(dev);
> phys_addr_t phys = ((phys_addr_t)max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT) - 1;
> u64 max_dma = phys_to_dma_direct(dev, phys, require_decrypted);
>
> @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static gfp_t dma_direct_optimal_gfp_mask(struct device *dev, u64 *phys_limit)
>
> bool dma_coherent_ok(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t phys, size_t size)
> {
> - bool require_decrypted = force_dma_unencrypted(dev);
> + bool require_decrypted = dma_require_decrypted(dev);
> dma_addr_t dma_addr = phys_to_dma_direct(dev, phys, require_decrypted);
>
> if (dma_addr == DMA_MAPPING_ERROR)
> @@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ void *dma_direct_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size,
> struct page *page;
> void *cpu_addr;
>
> - if (force_dma_unencrypted(dev))
> + if (dma_require_decrypted(dev))
> attrs |= __DMA_ATTR_ALLOC_CC_SHARED;
>
> if (attrs & __DMA_ATTR_ALLOC_CC_SHARED) {
> @@ -385,7 +385,7 @@ void dma_direct_free(struct device *dev, size_t size,
> * If the allocation used decrypted/shared backing pages, restore
> * the encryption state on free.
> */
> - if (force_dma_unencrypted(dev))
> + if (dma_require_decrypted(dev))
> attrs |= __DMA_ATTR_ALLOC_CC_SHARED;
>
> if (attrs & __DMA_ATTR_ALLOC_CC_SHARED)
> @@ -452,7 +452,7 @@ struct page *dma_direct_alloc_pages(struct device *dev, size_t size,
> struct page *page;
> void *cpu_addr;
>
> - if (force_dma_unencrypted(dev))
> + if (dma_require_decrypted(dev))
> attrs |= __DMA_ATTR_ALLOC_CC_SHARED;
>
> if ((attrs & __DMA_ATTR_ALLOC_CC_SHARED) && dma_direct_use_pool(dev, gfp))
> @@ -496,7 +496,7 @@ void dma_direct_free_pages(struct device *dev, size_t size,
> * if the device had requested for an unencrypted buffer,
> * convert it to encrypted on free
> */
> - bool mark_mem_encrypted = force_dma_unencrypted(dev);
> + bool mark_mem_encrypted = dma_require_decrypted(dev);
>
> /* If page is not from an atomic pool, dma_free_from_pool_page() fails */
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_COHERENT_POOL) &&
> @@ -665,7 +665,7 @@ int dma_direct_mmap(struct device *dev, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> const pgoff_t pgoff_end = vma_end_pgoff(vma);
> int ret = -ENXIO;
>
> - if (force_dma_unencrypted(dev))
> + if (dma_require_decrypted(dev))
> attrs |= DMA_ATTR_CC_SHARED;
>
> vma->vm_page_prot = dma_pgprot(dev, vma->vm_page_prot, attrs);
> @@ -814,7 +814,7 @@ size_t dma_direct_max_mapping_size(struct device *dev)
> /* If SWIOTLB is active, use its maximum mapping size */
> if (is_swiotlb_active(dev) &&
> (dma_addressing_limited(dev) || is_swiotlb_force_bounce(dev) ||
> - force_dma_unencrypted(dev)))
> + dma_require_decrypted(dev)))
> return swiotlb_max_mapping_size(dev);
>
> return SIZE_MAX;
> diff --git a/kernel/dma/mapping.c b/kernel/dma/mapping.c
> index ded585b39fb92..0252473edd0b5 100644
> --- a/kernel/dma/mapping.c
> +++ b/kernel/dma/mapping.c
> @@ -673,7 +673,7 @@ void *dma_alloc_attrs(struct device *dev, size_t size, dma_addr_t *dma_handle,
> return NULL;
> }
>
> - if (force_dma_unencrypted(dev))
> + if (dma_require_decrypted(dev))
> attrs |= __DMA_ATTR_ALLOC_CC_SHARED;
>
> if (dma_alloc_from_dev_coherent(dev, size, dma_handle, &cpu_addr)) {
> diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> index 2c57b49ac7c06..ddfc4533934a2 100644
> --- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> +++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> @@ -1550,7 +1550,7 @@ phys_addr_t swiotlb_tbl_map_single(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t orig_addr,
> if (cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_GUEST_MEM_ENCRYPT)) {
>
> /* swiotlb pool is incorrect for this device */
> - if (unlikely(mem->cc_shared != force_dma_unencrypted(dev)))
> + if (unlikely(mem->cc_shared != dma_require_decrypted(dev)))
> return (phys_addr_t)DMA_MAPPING_ERROR;
>
> } else if (cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_HOST_MEM_ENCRYPT)) {
Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-03 10:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-03 3:49 [PATCH v2 0/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Support guest-level Realm VSMMU (Part-1) Nicolin Chen
2026-11-03 3:49 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] firmware: arm_rmm: Add VSMMU commands and fields Nicolin Chen
2026-11-03 3:49 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] dma-mapping: Let a device declare that it reaches private memory Nicolin Chen
2026-11-03 10:11 ` Marek Szyprowski
2026-11-03 3:49 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] dma-mapping: Keep DMA memory private for capable devices Nicolin Chen
2026-11-03 10:10 ` Marek Szyprowski [this message]
2026-11-03 3:49 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] iommu: Let a driver mark an IOMMU as confidential Nicolin Chen
2026-11-03 3:49 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] iommu: Introduce TDISP T=0 state for confidential IOMMUs Nicolin Chen
2026-11-03 3:49 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] iommu: Park TDISP T=0 devices in the blocking domain Nicolin Chen
2026-11-03 3:49 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Probe a guest-level Realm VSMMU via RSI commands Nicolin Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b1058c89-2e87-4035-b7be-76e93fe3ac07@samsung.com \
--to=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=ankita@nvidia.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=driver-core@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=praan@google.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
--cc=smostafa@google.com \
--cc=sonangp@nvidia.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®