From: Prashanth K <quic_prashk@quicinc.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
<linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] usb: common: usb-conn-gpio: Set last role to unknown before initial detection
Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 01:08:58 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b14dd204-180d-8035-3eaf-8a53692ef546@quicinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2023052943-headfirst-satchel-6d90@gregkh>
On 30-05-23 12:31 am, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 12:00:15AM +0530, Prashanth K wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 28-05-23 05:03 pm, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/common/usb-conn-gpio.c b/drivers/usb/common/usb-conn-gpio.c
>>>>>> index e20874c..30bdb81 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/usb/common/usb-conn-gpio.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/common/usb-conn-gpio.c
>>>>>> @@ -257,6 +257,9 @@ static int usb_conn_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>>>> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, info);
>>>>>> device_set_wakeup_capable(&pdev->dev, true);
>>>>>> + /* Set last role to unknown before performing the initial detection */
>>>>>> + info->last_role = USB_ROLE_UNKNOWN;
>>>>>
>>>>> Shouldn't last_role have already been set to 0? If so, why not just
>>>>> have this enum value be 0?
>>>> Last role would be 0 during first detection, that's the problem here.
>>>> During initial detection, if the the new role is detected as USB_ROLE_NONE
>>>> (0), then we wouldn't call the set_role(). But it should send the current
>>>> role to gadget after the inital detection.
>>>
>>> So you are hoping that the old enum type is still assigned to 0? That's
>>> brave, please make it explicit otherwise it's very hard to follow or
>>> ensure that this really will happen. And most of all, document it so
>>> that that value remains 0 in the future, otherwise a list of enum types
>>> without explicit values are seen as if the values do not matter.
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>>
>>> greg k-h
>>
>> So I think it would be better to add USB_ROLE_UNKNOWN towards the end of
>> enum usb_role, so that we can avoid explicit declaration. Is that fine?
>>
>> enum usb_role {
>> USB_ROLE_NONE,
>> USB_ROLE_HOST,
>> USB_ROLE_DEVICE,
>> + USB_ROLE_UNKNOWN,
>
> Either is fine, be explicit, or not, just don't mix the two please.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Thanks for the suggestion, will update it in next patch.
Regards,
Prashanth K
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-29 19:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-25 8:53 Prashanth K
2023-05-25 16:34 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-05-26 4:45 ` Prashanth K
2023-05-28 11:33 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-05-29 18:30 ` Prashanth K
2023-05-29 19:01 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-05-29 19:38 ` Prashanth K [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b14dd204-180d-8035-3eaf-8a53692ef546@quicinc.com \
--to=quic_prashk@quicinc.com \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®