From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: oe-kbuild@lists.linux.dev,
"Ronald Tschalär" <ronald@innovation.ch>,
lkp@intel.com, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: drivers/input/keyboard/applespi.c:1833 applespi_drain_writes() warn: mixing irqsave and irq
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 19:21:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b157bed2-2ada-4086-bb67-ae4e6762bd72@suswa.mountain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZoLj2LL0NzdS1gZL@google.com>
On Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 10:14:00AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > 038b1a05eae666 Ronald Tschalär 2019-07-15 1826 static void applespi_drain_writes(struct applespi_data *applespi)
> > 038b1a05eae666 Ronald Tschalär 2019-07-15 1827 {
> > 038b1a05eae666 Ronald Tschalär 2019-07-15 1828 unsigned long flags;
> > 038b1a05eae666 Ronald Tschalär 2019-07-15 1829
> > 038b1a05eae666 Ronald Tschalär 2019-07-15 1830 spin_lock_irqsave(&applespi->cmd_msg_lock, flags);
> >
> > _irqsave() sort of implies that potentially the caller has disabled IRQs,
> > otherwise we would use spin_lock_irq() if we knew they hadn't disabled
> > IRQs.
> >
> > 038b1a05eae666 Ronald Tschalär 2019-07-15 1831
> > 038b1a05eae666 Ronald Tschalär 2019-07-15 1832 applespi->drain = true;
> > 038b1a05eae666 Ronald Tschalär 2019-07-15 @1833 wait_event_lock_irq(applespi->drain_complete, !applespi->write_active,
> > 038b1a05eae666 Ronald Tschalär 2019-07-15 1834 applespi->cmd_msg_lock);
> >
> > This will renable IRQs briefly and then disable them again.
> >
> > 038b1a05eae666 Ronald Tschalär 2019-07-15 1835
> > 038b1a05eae666 Ronald Tschalär 2019-07-15 1836 spin_unlock_irqrestore(&applespi->cmd_msg_lock, flags);
> >
> > This will set them back to how they were at the start of the function.
> >
> > The issue is that if the caller really wanted IRQs disabled, then it's
> > not necessarilly a good idea to enable them at all in the
> > wait_event_lock_irq() macro. I suspect that in real life no callers
> > disable IRQs so it's not an issue. But anyway, that's what the warning
> > is about.
>
> applespi_drain_writes() and applespi_drain_reads() are only called from
> the process context with interrupts enabled, so it looks like we should
> simply change spin_lock_irqsave() to spin_lock_irq().
>
> I am taking patches ;)
Sure. I can send that.
regards,
dan carpenter
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-01 17:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-01 16:30 Dan Carpenter
2024-07-01 17:14 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2024-07-01 17:21 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b157bed2-2ada-4086-bb67-ae4e6762bd72@suswa.mountain \
--to=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oe-kbuild@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=ronald@innovation.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®