From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>,
Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ulf.hansson@linaro.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org,
broonie@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH BUGFIX] block: make elevator_get robust against cross blk/blk-mq choice
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 16:10:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b1a1ad6d-6e22-7d55-bbad-40807d95f59b@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <89b98d59-fcae-6b13-a6a1-6fe62967929d@kernel.dk>
On 02/13/2017 03:28 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 02/13/2017 03:09 PM, Omar Sandoval wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 10:01:07PM +0100, Paolo Valente wrote:
>>> If, at boot, a legacy I/O scheduler is chosen for a device using blk-mq,
>>> or, viceversa, a blk-mq scheduler is chosen for a device using blk, then
>>> that scheduler is set and initialized without any check, driving the
>>> system into an inconsistent state. This commit addresses this issue by
>>> letting elevator_get fail for these wrong cross choices.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>> block/elevator.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++--------
>>> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> Hey, Paolo,
>>
>> How exactly are you triggering this? In __elevator_change(), we do check
>> for mq or not mq:
>>
>> if (!e->uses_mq && q->mq_ops) {
>> elevator_put(e);
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>> if (e->uses_mq && !q->mq_ops) {
>> elevator_put(e);
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>>
>> We don't ever appear to call elevator_init() with a specific scheduler
>> name, and for the default we switch off of q->mq_ops and use the
>> defaults from Kconfig:
>>
>> if (q->mq_ops && q->nr_hw_queues == 1)
>> e = elevator_get(CONFIG_DEFAULT_SQ_IOSCHED, false);
>> else if (q->mq_ops)
>> e = elevator_get(CONFIG_DEFAULT_MQ_IOSCHED, false);
>> else
>> e = elevator_get(CONFIG_DEFAULT_IOSCHED, false);
>>
>> if (!e) {
>> printk(KERN_ERR
>> "Default I/O scheduler not found. " \
>> "Using noop/none.\n");
>> e = elevator_get("noop", false);
>> }
>>
>> So I guess this could happen if someone manually changed those Kconfig
>> options, but I don't see what other case would make this happen, could
>> you please explain?
>
> Was wondering the same - is it using the 'elevator=' boot parameter?
> Didn't look at that path just now, but that's the only one I could
> think of. If it is, I'd much prefer only using 'chosen_elevator' for
> the non-mq stuff, and the fix should be just that instead.
>
> So instead of:
>
> if (!e && *chosen_elevator) {
>
> do
>
> if (!e && !q->mq_ops && && *chosen_elevator) {
Confirmed, that's what it seems to be, and here's a real diff of the
above example that works for me:
diff --git a/block/elevator.c b/block/elevator.c
index 27ff1ed5a6fa..699d10f71a2c 100644
--- a/block/elevator.c
+++ b/block/elevator.c
@@ -207,11 +207,12 @@ int elevator_init(struct request_queue *q, char *name)
}
/*
- * Use the default elevator specified by config boot param or
- * config option. Don't try to load modules as we could be running
- * off async and request_module() isn't allowed from async.
+ * Use the default elevator specified by config boot param for
+ * non-mq devices, or by config option. Don't try to load modules
+ * as we could be running off async and request_module() isn't
+ * allowed from async.
*/
- if (!e && *chosen_elevator) {
+ if (!e && !q->mq_ops && *chosen_elevator) {
e = elevator_get(chosen_elevator, false);
if (!e)
printk(KERN_ERR "I/O scheduler %s not found\n",
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-13 23:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-13 21:01 [PATCH BUGFIX] attempt to fix wrong scheduler selection Paolo Valente
2017-02-13 21:01 ` [PATCH BUGFIX] block: make elevator_get robust against cross blk/blk-mq choice Paolo Valente
2017-02-13 21:12 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-02-13 22:09 ` Omar Sandoval
2017-02-13 22:28 ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-13 23:10 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2017-02-14 8:14 ` Paolo Valente
2017-02-14 15:16 ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-14 15:48 ` Paolo Valente
2017-02-14 6:58 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-02-14 7:07 ` Omar Sandoval
2017-02-14 7:11 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-02-14 15:13 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b1a1ad6d-6e22-7d55-bbad-40807d95f59b@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=osandov@osandov.com \
--cc=paolo.valente@linaro.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®