From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
To: Binoy Jayan <binoy.jayan@linaro.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: staging/wilc1000: wrong conversion to completion?
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 09:41:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b1b02b78-041e-469b-702c-d1b5ebef8ec7@suse.cz> (raw)
Hi,
while looking at this commit:
commit b27a6d5e636ac80b223a18ca2b3c892f1caef9e3
Author: Binoy Jayan <binoy.jayan@linaro.org>
Date: Wed Jun 15 11:00:34 2016 +0530
staging: wilc1000: Replace semaphore txq_event with completion
The semaphore 'txq_event' is used as completion, so convert it
to a struct completion type.
Signed-off-by: Binoy Jayan <binoy.jayan@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
diff --git a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/linux_wlan.c
b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/linux_wlan.c
index 274c390d17cd..baf932681362 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/linux_wlan.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/linux_wlan.c
@@ -316,7 +316,7 @@ static int linux_wlan_txq_task(void *vp)
complete(&wl->txq_thread_started);
while (1) {
- down(&wl->txq_event);
+ wait_for_completion(&wl->txq_event);
if (wl->close) {
complete(&wl->txq_thread_started);
@@ -650,7 +650,7 @@ void wilc1000_wlan_deinit(struct net_device *dev)
mutex_unlock(&wl->hif_cs);
}
if (&wl->txq_event)
- up(&wl->txq_event);
+ wait_for_completion(&wl->txq_event);
I wonder: is this correct? Should that be complete() instead?
wlan_deinitialize_threads(dev);
deinit_irq(dev);
@@ -681,7 +681,7 @@ static int wlan_init_locks(struct net_device *dev)
spin_lock_init(&wl->txq_spinlock);
sema_init(&wl->txq_add_to_head_cs, 1);
- sema_init(&wl->txq_event, 0);
+ init_completion(&wl->txq_event);
sema_init(&wl->cfg_event, 0);
sema_init(&wl->sync_event, 0);
@@ -738,7 +738,7 @@ static void wlan_deinitialize_threads(struct
net_device *dev)
wl->close = 1;
if (&wl->txq_event)
- up(&wl->txq_event);
+ complete(&wl->txq_event);
if (wl->txq_thread) {
kthread_stop(wl->txq_thread);
thanks,
--
js
suse labs
next reply other threads:[~2016-07-11 7:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-11 7:41 Jiri Slaby [this message]
2016-07-11 8:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-07-20 4:36 ` Binoy Jayan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b1b02b78-041e-469b-702c-d1b5ebef8ec7@suse.cz \
--to=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=binoy.jayan@linaro.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®