From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763083AbXGYGTe (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jul 2007 02:19:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754537AbXGYGT0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jul 2007 02:19:26 -0400 Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.228]:56298 "EHLO wr-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754159AbXGYGTY (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jul 2007 02:19:24 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=gFZXZlBWaUatMLUpts/YDFOpo26AAZbLrz1UKc/of0C+Hy5ayDwFQCF5f6pNOtFIbmpKNBK76IqjGC9ILR1V6gkvm7JS2JBhi4YVeFVRTxddh4CbmXg0a77jTMqyECGI5iTcLzhRj0jtl/x0LMJICNRiHCxTxaojEUIuL8nEjEE= Message-ID: Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 16:19:19 +1000 From: "Matthew Hawkins" To: "Nick Piggin" Subject: Re: [ck] Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 Cc: "Eric St-Laurent" , "Ray Lee" , "Jesper Juhl" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "ck list" , linux-mm@kvack.org, "Paul Jackson" , "Andrew Morton" , "Rene Herman" In-Reply-To: <46A6E1A1.4010508@yahoo.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070710013152.ef2cd200.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <9a8748490707231608h453eefffx68b9c391897aba70@mail.gmail.com> <46A57068.3070701@yahoo.com.au> <2c0942db0707232153j3670ef31kae3907dff1a24cb7@mail.gmail.com> <46A58B49.3050508@yahoo.com.au> <2c0942db0707240915h56e007e3l9110e24a065f2e73@mail.gmail.com> <46A6CC56.6040307@yahoo.com.au> <46A6D7D2.4050708@gmail.com> <1185341449.7105.53.camel@perkele> <46A6E1A1.4010508@yahoo.com.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 7/25/07, Nick Piggin wrote: > Not to say that neither fix some problems, but for such conceptually > big changes, it should take a little more effort than a constructed test > case and no consideration of the alternatives to get it merged. Swap Prefetch has existed since September 5, 2005. Please Nick, enlighten us all with your "alternatives" which have been offered (in practical, not theoretical form) in the past 23 months, along with their non-constructed benchmarks proving their case and the hordes of happy users and kernel developers who have tested them out the wazoo and given their backing. Or just take a nice steaming jug of STFU. -- Matt